Enterprise Architecture

SAP has announced a new offering called “Private Edition, Transition Option”, designed to support large enterprises with intricate ERP landscapes in their move to the cloud. As part of the RISE with SAP program, this solution offers a structured migration path for organizations that require more time and flexibility to shift from on-premise systems to SAP cloud ERP. The offering is scheduled to launch in Q2 2025, with availability for purchase starting in 2028 and support for active usage from 2031 through 2033. With this early disclosure, SAP is providing enterprises with sufficient time to plan and execute their transformation strategies.

Detailed Breakdown of SAP’s Launch of “Private Edition, Transition Option”

Timeline and Implementation Window

This edition will be officially announced in Q2 2025. However, customers will only be able to purchase it starting in 2028, and the actual usage period is limited to the years 2031 through 2033. The extended lead time highlights SAP’s recognition of the complexities involved in transitioning large ERP systems and its intent to enable detailed planning.

Targeting Complex SAP ERP Environments

This offering is specifically aimed at customers with large, complex on-premise SAP ERP systems, often involving hundreds of connected components. These organizations typically face longer timelines and greater challenges in migrating to cloud ERP, making this edition a tailored solution to meet their needs.

Core Features and Functionality of the “Private Edition, Transition Option”

At its core, the “Private Edition, Transition Option” supports SAP ECC (ERP Central Component) and includes critical services such as security patches, legal compliance updates, and transformation support. This ensures ongoing business continuity while enabling structured cloud migration through the RISE with SAP framework. The offering also integrates transformation services to help customers prepare for and eventually complete their move to SAP cloud ERP.

Key Requirements and Limitations

SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option” applies only to SAP ECC. It does not extend to the full SAP Business Suite 7, which will remain available for subscription only until the end of 2030. To qualify, organizations must move their relevant systems to SAP ERP, private edition, by the 2030 deadline. Additionally, only SAP HANA will be supported as a database, meaning businesses currently using alternative platforms must plan for migration. The use of outdated third-party technologies, including older Java versions, will also no longer be supported under SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option”, requiring modernization efforts before adoption.

Strategic Clarification

SAP has emphasized that SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option” is not a means to extend maintenance for legacy SAP ERP systems. Rather, it is a temporary pathway to enable transition into SAP’s cloud ERP environment, reinforcing the company’s push toward full cloud adoption across its customer base.

Common Questions We Are Hearing

• Is SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option” an extension of SAP ECC support? No. SAP has been clear that it is not a maintenance extension. It is a cloud subscription offering designed to support transition, not long-term use of ECC.
• Will customers have to migrate to SAP HANA? Yes. The SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option” only supports SAP HANA as its database platform. Organizations using Oracle, SQL Server, or other databases will need to plan migrations.
• What happens if the migration is not completed by 2030? Organizations that do not move to SAP ERP, private edition, by the end of 2030 will not be eligible to access SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option”.
• Does this cover SAP CRM, SRM, or other modules? No. The “Private Edition, Transition Option” is focused strictly on SAP ECC and does not apply to broader Business Suite components.

Analyst’s Take on the Offering

Merit and Demerit Analysis

Merits:

• It offers flexibility and structured support to organizations with large, complex ERP deployments.
• It enables continuity through critical updates and includes transformation services tailored to enterprise needs.
• Early announcement allows long-term planning, budgeting, and team alignment.

Demerits:

• The offering is limited to SAP ECC, leaving customers with broader Business Suite use cases to seek alternative paths.
• Mandatory use of SAP HANA may increase migration costs and technical overhead.
• Higher fees during the 2031–2033 window may strain financial planning for some organizations.

Impact on Key Stakeholders

• IT Departments: Will need to assess legacy architecture readiness for migration. And also determine the work required to move to SAP HANA in advance of enrollment.
• Financial Leadership: CFOs must weigh the value of business continuity. Also, phased transition against the higher subscription cost of the offering.
• Implementation Partners: Consulting and service firms will likely see growing demand from enterprises planning, especially around 2028.

Future Predictions

SAP is likely setting a model for how ERP vendors handle large-scale migrations for legacy-heavy clients. Other enterprise software companies may follow this hybrid, phased-migration model that supports both continuity and transformation. In preparation for the “Private Edition, Transition Option”, we can expect an increase in SAP HANA adoption and modernization of third-party technologies (such as middleware and legacy Java)

Industry Trend Observation

The emergence of SAP “Private Edition, Transition Option” aligns with a broader industry trend: cloud migration at scale, but with flexibility for complex environments. Rather than enforcing rigid deadlines, SAP is offering a bridge strategy, enabling transformation without business disruption.

FAQs

SYSPRO research indicates that while manufacturers around the world are increasingly interested in adopting smart manufacturing technologies, many are encountering considerable obstacles in their path to deployment. The study explores the current landscape of digital transformation in manufacturing, finding that despite enthusiasm for AI, automation, and IIoT, companies are often held back by internal limitations such as outdated systems, poor data accessibility, and workforce shortages.

Breaking Down the Key Insights

Smart Manufacturing Gains Momentum

Insights from SYSPRO research show that a growing number of manufacturers have already started incorporating advanced technologies into their operations:

• 37% have rolled out automation and robotics.
• 19% have adopted artificial intelligence or machine learning.
• 18% are leveraging the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).

Looking ahead to 2025, SYSPRO research finds that the top three focus areas are investment in AI and automation (40%), enhancing digital integration for real-time decision-making (29%), and using technology to reduce costs (24%).

China Takes the Lead in Adoption

SYSPRO research also underscores regional disparities, noting that nearly 45% of Chinese manufacturers have already embraced emerging technologies. This positions China ahead of North America and Europe, reflecting both stronger policy support and faster tech implementation on the ground.

AI Is Gaining Ground, but Rollout Remains Limited

While the interest in artificial intelligence is evident, SYSPRO research reveals that only 12% of companies have fully deployed AI systems. A further 57% are currently in the exploration or evaluation phase, and 11% expect to begin implementation within the next year. In total, nearly 80% are engaging with AI in some form, pointing to its rising importance across the industry.

Deployment Faces Operational Barriers

Despite clear momentum, actual ERP implementation continues to be a hurdle. According to SYSPRO research, 30% of manufacturers cite challenges with integrating new technologies into legacy systems. Another 15% are constrained by outdated infrastructure, while a separate 15% point to issues with scalability.

Data and Analytics Still Lag Behind

The report also draws attention to persistent data-related challenges. SYSPRO research notes that 40% of surveyed manufacturers lack access to real-time operational data, while 24% are not currently using any form of analytics. Only 23% have made analytics a near-term priority, suggesting this area remains underdeveloped for many.

Workforce Readiness Is a Growing Concern

One of the recurring themes in SYSPRO research is the shortage of qualified personnel. Around 30% of respondents report difficulty in sourcing talent with the skills needed to support advanced technologies. Additionally, concerns around supply chain stability (23%) and cybersecurity risks (12%) continue to affect confidence in the pace of digital change.

Common Questions We Are Hearing

1. Is now the right time to invest in AI and smart tech? A common concern among buyers is whether they risk falling behind by waiting. Based on SYSPRO research, although widespread deployment is still limited, most companies are preparing for AI adoption, making the current moment a critical planning phase.
2. Can small and mid-sized manufacturers afford digital transformation? The upfront costs can be high, prompting questions about ROI. SYSPRO research suggests that financial incentives, such as phased rollouts or external funding, may be essential for smaller firms to keep pace.
3. Are legacy ERP systems compatible with new smart technologies? Integration is a major issue. As SYSPRO research shows, many organizations are held back by rigid or outdated systems that don’t support easy incorporation of advanced tools.
4. How important is workforce training in successful implementation? SYSPRO research clearly points out that technology alone isn’t enough. Upskilling the workforce is seen as critical to ensuring these investments translate into productivity and performance gains.

Analyst’s Take on SYSPRO research Findings

The findings of SYSPRO research reflect a manufacturing sector that is eager to evolve but grappling with deeply embedded challenges. The data points to a transitional period, marked by bold plans, cautious steps, and an urgent need for infrastructure and workforce alignment.

Merits and Demerits

• Merit: Smart manufacturing technologies promise operational efficiency, cost savings, and improved real-time decision-making.
• Demerit: As shown in SYSPRO research, without robust systems and skilled staff in place, these technologies risk underdelivery or poor integration outcomes.

Stakeholder Implications

• Manufacturers must assess their readiness not only from a tech perspective but also in terms of workforce capability and long-term sustainability.
• Technology providers should focus on compatibility and ease of integration to support clients operating with legacy infrastructure.
• Employees remain the backbone of this transformation. Investments in training and change management will be just as critical as the tools themselves.

Future Outlook

Based on the trajectory outlined by SYSPRO research, the industry is expected to:

• Address regional adoption gaps with tailored support strategies.
• Accelerate AI, automation, and data initiatives.
• Expand investments in digital skill development.
• Shift toward more modular ERP solutions that support integration.

FAQs

Zoho CRM has strong adoption among SMB companies such as marketing agencies, tech startups, and software development firms. Some enterprise companies use it as well. By comparison, Microsoft Dynamics 365 CRM is built for mid-to-large-sized businesses. Zoho works especially well for organizations that use other Zoho products. However, it may not support the advanced CRM needs of product-focused companies.

Conversely, Microsoft Dynamics offers rich functionality but may not suit smaller companies with limited budgets. It stands out to companies seeking powerful operational capabilities, such as territory planning, centralized compliance, complex CPQ processes, and integrated project management. Both platforms offer a comprehensive CRM suite—Sales Cloud, Marketing Cloud, Field Service, and Customer Service. Still, their customization approaches differ.

Zoho provides a low-code/no-code customization platform, which is useful for lighter needs. It has limitations at the business object level. In contrast, Microsoft Dynamics allows full overrides of business objects. This enables advanced CX workflows, much like Salesforce. Additionally, Dynamics 365 includes an enterprise-grade Customer Insights platform, making it a strong fit for B2C companies using CDP workflows. It does offer marketing automation, but the capabilities are somewhat limited with weaker website integration compared to HubSpot’s built-in CMS.

Zoho takes a different path. It includes a CMS, but its ecosystem and integrations are less extensive than HubSpot or WordPress. Its data model is similar to Salesforce—leads are separate objects, and accounts link to contact data. In comparison, Dynamics 365 mandates some layers of product data as well. This added complexity may require input of operational and financial data that sales and marketing teams don’t always need. With that context, let’s now compare the specific strengths and limitations of Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics.

What Is Zoho CRM?

Zoho’s strategy mirrors Microsoft’s, offering a broad suite of apps across business functions. However, these apps often run on isolated data models, which can limit cross-functional insights and increase integration efforts. While Zoho’s native app ecosystem reduces the need for third-party tools, it also restricts ecosystem openness, with fewer pre-built integrations compared to platforms like Salesforce or HubSpot. This can impact scalability for businesses looking to follow a best-of-breed tech stack approach.

How important is pricing flexibility versus long-term scalability for your team? Can your organization manage DIY implementations, or is consultant support necessary? Will your marketing, sales, and IT teams benefit more from tightly integrated native tools or from deeper third-party app ecosystems? Zoho offers a compelling value proposition, especially for growing businesses—but these trade-offs must be weighed carefully. Download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide for detailed insights.

What Is Microsoft Dynamics CRM?

Microsoft Dynamics 365 offers a unified CRM suite that connects deeply with its ERP systems, especially for mid-sized and enterprise businesses. Unlike other platforms, Microsoft bundles key features—like core CRM, customer insights, and service modules—into a single, tightly integrated offering. This tight connection with product and pricing data improves data consistency but also adds complexity. As a result, Dynamics 365 often demands more setup time and consulting support. By contrast, CRMs like Salesforce or HubSpot are generally easier to implement, offering faster onboarding and smoother initial experiences.

How important is native integration between your CRM and ERP systems? Do your sales and marketing teams need simplicity, or are they equipped to handle more complex, enterprise-grade tools? Can your organization support a higher implementation effort if it means gaining better long-term alignment across data and workflows? Microsoft Dynamics 365 might be the right fit if global workflows and deep customization are key. Download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now to compare how these leading platforms stack up.

Zoho vs Microsoft Dynamics CRM Overall Comparison

Zoho is known for its simplicity and affordability, making it a strong choice for SMBs. It integrates well within its own suite but may face challenges when scaling or connecting with external systems. Microsoft Dynamics, on the other hand, is built for complexity. It handles global workflows, territory planning, and compliance with ease. However, that power comes with a steeper learning curve and often requires consulting support. Each platform takes a different approach to CRM features, data models, and integration depth.

Are you focused on fast deployment and tight cost control? Or do you need a platform that can support long-term global growth? Do you prioritize seamless integration across internal tools—or openness to a broader ecosystem? Can your team manage complex customizations, or would you rather keep things simple? Download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now to dive deeper.

Zoho vs Microsoft Dynamics CRM Module Comparison

Both Zoho and Microsoft Dynamics CRM come packed with features aimed at different market segments. This comparison highlights the key differences between the two platforms across several important areas. In the sections that follow, we break down capabilities across core modules—specifically marketing, sales, customer service, and e-commerce.

Marketing

Zoho and Microsoft Dynamics CRM both offer a range of marketing capabilities, but they take different approaches. Zoho leans on its broader ecosystem with apps like Zoho Campaigns and Zoho Social to support content, email, and social media marketing. While it doesn’t have a built-in content creation module, tools like Zoho Writer and PageSense help fill that gap. Microsoft Dynamics CRM, on the other hand, offers stronger native integration with reusable content blocks and tighter control over metadata and SEO elements. It also supports centralized social media management and email marketing, though some features may require additional setup.

What matters more to your team—integrated tools within one ecosystem or deeper built-in capabilities? Do you rely heavily on SEO and social campaigns, or are email workflows your priority? How much control do you need over content reuse and personalization? Thinking through these questions can help you align platform strengths with your marketing goals. Download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now to explore these differences in depth.

Sales

Zoho and Microsoft Dynamics CRM both offer solid capabilities to support sales teams. Zoho provides an easy-to-use pipeline view, email tracking, and scheduling features, along with real-time chat for collaboration. Its tools are well-suited for small to mid-sized businesses looking for quick setup and flexibility. Microsoft Dynamics CRM, while offering similar features, is more tailored for complex sales operations. Its lead management and collaboration tools are built to support larger teams with more structured workflows and data-driven decision-making.

What kind of sales process does your team follow—simple and fast-moving, or complex and layered? Do your reps need real-time communication tools, or deeper data insights to close deals? How important is it to have built-in scheduling and email analytics? These questions can guide your evaluation. For a closer look at how each platform aligns with your sales goals, download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now.

Customer Service

Zoho supports real-time communication through tools like Zoho Desk and SalesIQ, along with ticketing, automation, and omni-channel support. It’s a solid fit for growing teams that want customizable workflows without too much complexity. Microsoft Dynamics CRM, on the other hand, brings enterprise-grade service tools. Its robust ticketing system, live chat, and self-service portal make it ideal for larger teams needing structured, automated support processes.

Does your team prioritize ease of use or deep automation? How important is omni-channel support for your customer experience goals? Are you looking for an integrated self-service portal or real-time help options? Answering these can clarify which CRM aligns best with your support needs. For a more detailed breakdown, download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now.

E-commerce 

Zoho provides tools for product catalog creation and integrates with Zoho Inventory for order processing. It also supports personalized experiences by connecting with other Zoho apps. Microsoft Dynamics CRM takes a more integrated approach with its ecosystem. It connects seamlessly with Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and offers advanced personalization features, including customer segmentation and tailored recommendations.

Are you looking for simple catalog tools or deep integration with supply chain systems? How important is personalization in your customer experience strategy? Do you need built-in segmentation and insights, or is basic integration enough? These questions can help guide your CRM selection. For a deeper dive into these capabilities, download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now.

Zoho vs Microsoft Dynamics CRM Pros

Zoho stands out with its built-in workflow builder and Zoho Creator, which makes it easy to build custom apps without third-party tools. Microsoft Dynamics CRM, on the other hand, is tailored for larger enterprises with complex structures. It supports advanced business objects, uses a shared data model, and integrates tightly with Microsoft’s broader ecosystem. It’s especially strong in CPQ, territory planning, and global compensation processes.

Are you looking for a platform that enables fast customization without heavy development? Or do you need deeper enterprise features with robust data modeling? Is integration across Microsoft apps a key part of your strategy? These are essential questions when comparing the two. For a detailed breakdown of how each platform aligns with your goals, download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now.

Zoho vs Microsoft Dynamics CRM Cons 

Zoho and Microsoft Dynamics CRM each come with their own set of limitations. For instance, Zoho may fall short in areas like territory management and pre-built integration outside its ecosystem. Its closed ecosystem can also limit flexibility when working with third-party tools. Meanwhile, Microsoft Dynamics offers deep capabilities but may pose usability challenges. Its tightly connected data and process models often require external consulting to implement effectively. Importing data can also be less intuitive, especially for sales teams working across systems.

Are you prepared to manage Zoho’s limited integration options? Or will Microsoft’s complexity add overhead to your team’s workflows? Does your business need open connectivity or tighter control with internal systems? Weighing these considerations is essential. For a clearer view of how each platform stacks up, download the ultimate Zoho CRM vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison guide now.

Download the Full Research Report

SugarCRM has announced a change in its business strategy, aiming to focus primarily on mid-market manufacturing and distribution companies. The update was shared during the company’s recent Analyst Summit. This shift is being led by CEO David Roberts, who joined the company in September 2024. SugarCRM will continue to support its existing customer base but will now prioritize industry-specific innovation and solutions for its newly defined core segment. The company also detailed several organizational, product, and messaging changes it plans to implement by July 2025. These initiatives are part of a broader realignment of the SugarCRM business strategy.

Breakdown of the SugarCRM Updated Business Strategy

1. Focus on Mid-Market Manufacturing and Distribution

SugarCRM is moving away from its previous horizontal, cross-industry CRM approach to concentrate on mid-sized businesses in the manufacturing and distribution sectors. This focus is intended to allow for more tailored product development, deeper domain-specific functionality, and a clearer alignment with the operational needs of these industries. 

2. Continued Support for Existing Customers

While narrowing its ideal customer profile, SugarCRM stated that it will continue to serve its existing customers across other industries. The company emphasized that the shift in focus does not signal the end of support or services for organizations outside manufacturing and distribution.

3. Operational and Product Changes by July 2025

Several internal and external changes are planned by the end of July:

• Finalizing a technology roadmap with clearer delivery timelines and industry-specific solutions. Rebuilding the executive leadership team to support the new strategic direction.
• Introducing a revised go-to-market strategy to align sales and marketing with target industry needs.
• Redesigning the partner model, including updated partner recruitment and enablement frameworks.
• Launching updated brand messaging.
• Revising the hosting model to potentially improve performance and deployment options.
• Updating product packaging and pricing structures.

4. New Messaging: From Automation to Sales Enablement

The company’s messaging will shift from “let the platform do the work” to “unlock the sales potential.” According to Chief Marketing Officer Clare Dorrian, this change is designed to better resonate with buyers in the company’s target industries by focusing on specific business outcomes rather than general platform automation.

5. Use of ChatGPT for Customer Insight Analysis

SugarCRM has adopted ChatGPT to help analyze customer and prospect inquiries at scale. This tool is being used to identify common themes and language used by potential customers when describing their challenges. One insight from this initiative is that prospects value SugarCRM’s flexibility, especially in manufacturing and wholesale distribution contexts.

6. Increased Emphasis on Relationship-Oriented Sales

The company has recognized a trend among buyers preferring solutions that offer immediate, practical value. As a result, SugarCRM’s marketing and sales teams will focus on consultative selling and building longer-term customer relationships rather than prioritizing short-term, transactional interactions.

Common Questions We Are Hearing

1. Will customers outside manufacturing and distribution be affected? Existing customers in unrelated sectors are asking if they will continue to receive the same level of support and product updates going forward.
2. Are upcoming features going to be tailored only to specific industries? Some customers are concerned that future releases may focus solely on manufacturing and distribution, limiting the platform’s usefulness for other sectors.
3. Will core CRM functionality be reduced? There are questions about whether general-purpose CRM capabilities will receive less attention in product development.
4. Will pricing changes affect current contracts? Buyers are seeking clarity on whether new pricing models will impact their existing plans or only apply to new customers.
5. Is the company moving away from open-source principles? Given SugarCRM’s history with open-source software, some users want to know if the shift in direction will affect transparency, flexibility, or customization options.

Analyst‘s Take on the SugarCRM Updated Business Strategy

Impact on Customers Inside and Outside the Target Segment

• For manufacturing and distribution companies, this strategic alignment could lead to more specialized workflows, faster time-to-value, and improved feature relevance.
• For customers outside these sectors, the focus may lead to slower updates or lower prioritization of their needs in future product development cycles.

Product Differentiation in a Competitive CRM Market

By targeting a specific segment, SugarCRM is setting itself apart from large horizontal CRM providers like Salesforce and HubSpot. This may help the company strengthen its position in a market where industry-specific CRMs are gaining traction. However, this strategy requires consistent delivery of specialized functionality and successful adoption by the target industries.

Short-Term Implications for Partners

SugarCRM’s partner model overhaul may create uncertainty in the short term. Existing partners will need to adapt to revised expectations, while the company may also attract new partners aligned with its industry focus. Long-term, a more focused ecosystem could offer stronger partner-customer alignment.

Evaluation of Messaging Strategy

The updated messaging emphasizes tangible business outcomes. This may better align with how mid-market buyers evaluate CRM platforms, on the basis of revenue impact, process improvement, and operational fit – rather than on automation features alone.

Generative AI and CRM Market Trends

The use of ChatGPT for market and sentiment analysis reflects a broader trend in the CRM industry, where vendors are increasingly using generative AI to uncover customer preferences, personalize engagement, and improve content strategies. SugarCRM’s application of this technology suggests a growing focus on AI-driven customer insight as a standard practice, another notable development within the broader SugarCRM business strategy.

FAQs

Zoho CRM has introduced a suite of updates in its Q1 2025 release, enhancing its enterprise-grade features to better cater to complex sales processes, customer engagement, analytics, and team collaboration. The updates cover a broad spectrum – from messaging integrations and ABM enhancements to advanced analytics and AI capabilities This indicates a focused push toward deeper customer intelligence and automation. Below is the breakdown of the new capabilities, their functionalities, and what they could mean for users of the platform.

Structured Breakdown of Key Updates

1. Expanded Messaging Integrations

Zoho CRM has strengthened its communication capabilities through deeper integrations with WhatsApp for Business and Line. WhatsApp users can now create and manage message templates, automate message delivery, and preview audio clips. A threaded reply format enhances continuity in customer conversations. Meanwhile, businesses using Line can manage messages, assign conversations, and share files—all from within the CRM interface. Thus, improving coordination among customer-facing teams.

2. Account-Based Marketing (ABM) Tools

The new ABM add-on allows businesses to focus on high-value accounts by segmenting them using RFM, firmographics, engagement metrics, and voice-of-the-customer data. Accounts can be enriched with external data sources, and personalized campaigns can be built and executed via Zoho Campaigns and CommandCenter. A new dashboard allows marketers to monitor account engagement and campaign performance in real time.

3. CPQ: Configure, Price, Quote Enhancements

The Guided Selling tool now extends support to custom modules, allowing businesses to create tailored selling workflows. This helps in structuring complex pricing logic and streamlining proposal generation across varied sales pipelines.

4. Kiosk Studio Enhancements

New features include the ability to reuse record-fetching components, view detailed records, and perform in-app actions such as opening specific records or links. Users can now clone kiosks, reorder buttons, and even use the kiosk screen without interactive buttons. Logged-in user variables and email field usage in actions are also supported.

5. Improved Subforms for Better Data Management

Subform permissions can now be customized (View, Create, Edit, Delete), including support for portal users. Other usability improvements include multi-column pinning, adjustable widths, and bulk row operations, making data handling more flexible and user-centric.

6. Formula Fields: More Control and Real-Time Updates

Formula fields using the Now() function can auto-refresh, ensuring real-time accuracy. Additionally, formulas can now be conditionally executed, allowing users to avoid unnecessary computations based on the record’s state.

7. Team Selling and Revenue Splits

Users can assign multiple stakeholders to a single deal. Two types of revenue splits are introduced: Revenue Split for direct contributors and Overlay Split for supporting roles. This structure supports collaborative selling and clear attribution of performance.

8. Forecasting Tools Get Smarter

Forecast hierarchies are now customizable, enabling users to exclude certain roles or territories. Forecasts can be manually adjusted by deal owners or managers. Notably, Zia – Zoho’s AI, now monitors performance deviations and sends alerts to sales leaders when anomalies are detected.

9. Advanced Analytical Charts

Five new chart types – Sankey, Waterfall, Treemap, Butterfly, and Cluster, enhance Zoho CRM’s data visualization capabilities. These allow deeper insights into process flows, metric changes, hierarchical data, comparative analysis, and grouped values respectively.

10. Revamped Data Sharing Rules

The redesigned UI for data sharing includes a dual-tab layout, module-level visibility, one-click activation, and the ability to clone rules. Search and filters have also been introduced, allowing easier access and governance.

11. Expanded Client Script Capabilities

Client scripts now support subform actions and are available in customer, partner, and vendor portals. Thus, improving user interactions and external stakeholder engagement.

12. QuickML Integration for Custom AI

QuickML enables no-code machine learning model creation directly within Zoho CRM. Businesses gain control over data preparation and model optimization, making it easier to build AI solutions suited to specific use cases.

13. Voice of the Customer (VoC) Updates

VoC now ingests data from platforms like YouTube and third-party review sources. It also moves from keywords to key phrases for higher clarity and introduces drill-down features for examining underlying sentiments.

Common Questions We Are Hearing

• Is WhatsApp automation compliant with regulations? Businesses are questioning whether the message templates and automated messaging features comply with region-specific data privacy laws.
• How will revenue split impact commission structures? Sales teams are keen to understand how revenue attribution will affect incentive payouts.
• Is QuickML truly no-code for non-technical users? There’s curiosity about the learning curve and whether QuickML is usable without data science expertise.
• Will VoC insights from YouTube and product reviews be reliable? Some stakeholders are skeptical about the accuracy and actionability of sentiment analysis from unstructured content.

Analyst’s Take

Merits and Demerits of Features

The update is ambitious and clearly aimed at enterprise-scale use. Features like revenue splits, ABM segmentation, and QuickML reflect a deeper commitment to data-driven selling and operational automation.

• Merits:
  • Businesses can better align sales and marketing through ABM.
  • Real-time forecasting and anomaly detection with Zia improves risk management.
  • Client script expansion and subform permissions allow tighter process control.
    
• Demerits:
  • Some features, like QuickML and ABM, might have a steep learning curve.
  • Expanded communication tools need careful compliance vetting in regulated industries.
  • The abundance of options could overwhelm SMB users.
    

Impact on Key Stakeholders

• Sales Teams: Benefit from better attribution and forecasting.
• Marketing Teams: Gain advanced segmentation and personalized campaign tools.
• IT/Admins: Will have to spend time configuring rules, permissions, and AI models.
• Customers: Likely to experience faster, more personalized engagement, provided teams implement features well.
  

Future Predictions

Zoho CRM is clearly moving toward consolidating enterprise CRM, AI, and analytics under one roof. The emphasis on automation, segmentation, and AI-driven insights aligns with industry-wide trends, especially in hyper-personalization and collaborative selling.

If adoption is seamless, Zoho CRM may compete more directly with giants like Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics in enterprise segments. The challenge will lie in ensuring usability and ROI for mid-market users.

FAQs

Salesforce supports companies of all sizes. It offers a startup-friendly version and is strong at handling complex CRM workflows. Oracle Cloud CX, on the other hand, includes a broad set of best-of-breed CRM components. These cover sales, marketing, service, content management, and advertising cloud. Companies that need advanced downstream platforms and cross-channel content workflows generally pair Salesforce with a marketing automation tool like HubSpot. Oracle Cloud CX, however, is tailored more toward large B2C enterprises, especially in industries like communications, media, and financial services.

Salesforce may not be the best fit for organizations with unique CRM structures. Real estate companies or niche non-profits often face limitations. Oracle Cloud CX, meanwhile, shines in specific areas such as ad spend traceability and CPQ processes. Both platforms offer a complete suite of CRM tools—Sales Cloud, Marketing Cloud, Field Service, Customer Service, CPQ, and CDP. Oracle Cloud CX brings strong enterprise-grade capabilities in marketing automation, ad tracking, and digital asset management. Still, it lacks the ecosystem depth and integration ease that Salesforce has with SalesTech, MarTech, and data vendors. As a result, it’s not typically the first choice for vendors looking to integrate with a CRM.

Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX both offer powerful eCommerce features within their CX suites. Despite this, Salesforce maintains a larger market share in both CX and eCommerce. Still, both platforms often need considerable consulting support to tailor workflows to fit specific needs. Neither offers the low- or no-code customization commonly found in CRM solutions aimed at smaller businesses.

To better evaluate the strengths and trade-offs between Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX, the next section explores their features in greater detail.

What Is Salesforce CRM?

The Salesforce platform is especially strong in handling enterprise workflows across pre-sales, sales, and post-sales stages. While it may not be the best fit for industries with niche CRM structures—like real estate or specialized non-profits—it delivers deep functionality for standard enterprise processes. Salesforce also provides ready-to-use business object layers, reducing the need for extensive custom development. Its strong presence in headless commerce and digital experience tools further supports its role as a reliable enterprise CX platform.

How well does your organization’s CRM strategy align with pre-configured industry workflows? Are you looking for a platform that minimizes custom development or one that can mold to highly specific business structures? How important is integration with modern commerce and digital platforms in your CRM roadmap? To explore how Salesforce compares to Oracle CRM across these dimensions, download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now.

What Is Oracle Cloud CX Platform?

Oracle Cloud CX brings together several advanced CRM components. These include tools for sales, marketing, service, content management, and advertising. It is designed with large B2C enterprises in mind, especially in sectors like communications, media, and financial services. However, the discontinuation of Oracle Commerce has narrowed its relevance for certain industries. Oracle’s recent acquisition of Cerner signals a deeper shift in focus—toward healthcare and high-data workloads.

How might Oracle’s shifting priorities impact long-term support for its CRM tools? Is your organization in an industry still fully aligned with Oracle’s evolving CX roadmap? Could a move toward healthcare and analytics affect the future functionality available to customer experience teams? For a closer look at how these trends affect your options, download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now.

Salesforce vs Oracle Cloud CX Overall Comparison

Salesforce offers a powerful, layered data structure ideal for complex customer-centric workflows. Oracle Cloud CX, meanwhile, delivers strong enterprise-grade tools for sales, service, and analytics. Both provide extensive customization options, though Oracle often requires more technical expertise. While Salesforce leads in ecosystem support and third-party integrations, Oracle offers robust territory and compensation planning capabilities.

Which CRM better matches your team’s operational complexity? Does your business need tighter marketing integration or more advanced incentive planning? Are your existing systems more compatible with Salesforce’s ecosystem, or does Oracle’s enterprise depth align better with your industry? Understanding these trade-offs is crucial. Download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore which solution aligns best with your business needs.

Salesforce vs Oracle Cloud CX Module Comparison

Both platforms come with a wide range of features aimed at companies seeking comprehensive suites. This comparison highlights the unique strengths of Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX across several key areas. It provides insights to help businesses make informed CRM decisions. The section breaks down features across four main modules: marketing, sales, customer service, and e-commerce.

Marketing

Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX both offer strong marketing features, though they take slightly different approaches. Salesforce provides marketing capabilities through its Marketing Cloud, including tools for content creation, SEO, social media, email marketing, and analytics. However, some of these tools may require additional technical support or third-party integrations. Oracle Cloud CX, through its Oracle Marketing Cloud, offers a rich content management system, automated campaign features, and robust integration with social media platforms. Its analytics tools deliver detailed insights into campaign performance and customer behavior, making it a solid choice for large enterprises with complex marketing needs.

What specific marketing capabilities matter most to your team—content creation, automation, or analytics? Do you prefer a more intuitive interface or deeper customization and control? How important is it that your CRM integrates easily with existing tools and platforms? To explore these differences further and find the best fit for your business, download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now.

Sales

Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX offer strong sales features, but with different strengths. Salesforce provides detailed lead management, customizable sales pipelines, and email tracking within its CRM. It also includes built-in tools like Chatter for team collaboration and features for meeting scheduling. Oracle Cloud CX, on the other hand, includes broad lead management capabilities and supports sales process visibility from start to finish. While it doesn’t include standalone email tracking, it integrates well with Oracle Marketing Cloud. Collaboration is supported, though meeting scheduling may require additional configuration.

How important is native email tracking for your sales team? Do you need built-in scheduling tools, or can those live outside your CRM? Are you looking for a platform that handles everything internally, or one that integrates well with other systems? To better understand how these platforms compare and which aligns with your business goals, download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now.

Customer Service

Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX both offer strong customer service capabilities. Salesforce includes tools for case management, live chat, automation, and omni-channel support through its Service Cloud. It’s designed to streamline service operations and enhance the customer experience. Oracle Cloud CX, through Oracle Service Cloud, offers similar strengths. It supports robust ticketing, live chat, AI-driven support automation, and consistent service across multiple channels. Both platforms are built to help businesses manage customer interactions more effectively, though they vary in how these features are implemented and integrated.

Do you need built-in AI to drive faster service resolutions? Is omni-channel support a top priority for your team? How do your current systems handle case routing and customer communication? These are key questions to consider when comparing the two platforms. To get a full breakdown of the differences and find the right fit for your business, download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now.

E-commerce 

Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX both deliver key e-commerce features, but with different strengths. Salesforce supports product catalog management and personalized shopping through its Commerce Cloud. It also helps businesses manage orders and fulfillment directly within the platform. Oracle Cloud CX, on the other hand, provides robust tools for catalog organization and integrates with Oracle Order Management Cloud for smoother fulfillment. It also emphasizes tailored shopping experiences, using customer data to deliver relevant recommendations and content.

Which platform aligns better with your current fulfillment setup? Does your team need deeper integration with ERP systems, or more flexibility in catalog management? How important is delivering personalized experiences to your online customers? These are critical questions to ask as you evaluate your options. Download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore the full comparison in detail.

Salesforce vs Oracle Cloud CX Pros

Salesforce and Oracle Cloud CX each bring strong capabilities to the table. Salesforce is known for its robust data model, enterprise-grade security, and flexibility for complex use cases. It also offers a wide ecosystem, making it a fit for diverse industries. Oracle Cloud CX, meanwhile, stands out with its integrated field service workflows and advanced CPQ tools—especially for telecom and media. It also excels in ad-spend tracking, giving businesses deeper insights into customer behavior across marketing platforms.

What level of data model complexity does your business require? Is ad-spend tracking a key priority for your marketing team? Do you need a CRM with embedded field service tools, or more flexibility in workflow customization? These are the types of questions that can help narrow down your options. Download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to get the full breakdown.

Salesforce vs Oracle Cloud CX Cons

Salesforce, while flexible for ad-hoc workflows, can be expensive to customize and often requires additional support. Its data model may not be as intuitive as others, like Microsoft Dynamics CRM. On the other hand, Oracle Cloud CX brings together several systems under one platform, but this can lead to a more complex and less streamlined user experience. It may also require significant change management and doesn’t always meet the needs of B2B post-sales processes.

Is your team prepared for the level of customization and consulting support these platforms might demand? How important is seamless ERP integration or post-sales workflow support to your operations? Are usability and user adoption key priorities in your CRM selection process? These considerations can help guide your CRM decision. Download the ultimate Oracle CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore these factors in greater detail and make a more informed choice.

Download the Full Research Report

Rootstock ERP has introduced a new Tariff Management module within its Manufacturing Cloud ERP platform. This feature is designed to assist manufacturers in navigating the financial and operational impact of global tariff shifts. Businesses can better understand tariff exposure and adjust their sourcing, pricing, and inventory strategies accordingly.

What Is Rootstock ERP Tariff Management Capability and Why It Matters

The features enable manufacturers to:

• Track the impact of tariffs on landed costs and gross margin.
• Run scenario simulations to assess sourcing, pricing, and inventory strategies.
• Optimize cost structures by accurately accounting for tariff-related expenses.

By utilizing Rootstock ERP Tariff Management, manufacturers can improve visibility into cost drivers, make informed decisions regarding sourcing and logistics based on tariff considerations, and improve overall supply chain efficiency.

Key Features: What Does the Tariff Management Tool Actually Do?

• Landed Cost Tracking: Calculates the total landed cost of goods, including tariffs, using weighted average costing.
• Tariff Scenario Planning: Enables teams to model the financial impact of proposed tariff changes before they go into effect.
• ERP Integration: Works seamlessly with procurement, inventory, and financial modules.
• Reporting & Analytics: Provides insights into the financial impact of tariffs across SKUs and suppliers.

Who Benefits? A Look at Impact Across Stakeholders

• Manufacturers: Gain real-time visibility into margin impact and cost trends.
• Procurement Teams: Gain clarity on landed costs and sourcing strategies.
• Finance Departments: Accurately forecast cash flow and margin impacts..
• Compliance Officers: Benefit from AvaTax Cross-Border integration for customs duty calculations and HS code classification.
• IT Teams: Benefit from built-in, cloud-native integration.

Common Client Questions We’re Hearing

• Integration Compatibility: Will it work with our current ERP or SCM stack?
• Real-Time Data: How fresh is the tariff information?
• Customization Flexibility: Can we adapt this to our trade scenarios?
• Complementary: How does it work alongside our existing compliance tools?
• Usability: How steep is the learning curve for end-users?
• Cost Efficiency: What’s the ROI for small vs. large enterprises when using Rootstock ERP Tariff Management?
• Scalability: Can it adapt to fast-changing trade policies?
• Support Commitment: What does Rootstock ERP Tariff Management offer post-implementation?

Analyst’s Take

As organizations evaluate Rootstock ERP Tariff Management, several strategic questions emerge. Below is an analyst’s breakdown of key considerations and implications for buyers across functions.

Integration Compatibility

Rootstock ERP Tariff Management integrates seamlessly with Salesforce-native environments, offering strong compatibility for modular ERP stacks. Organizations with legacy systems may face integration complexity and should carefully evaluate API flexibility.

Tariff Data, Currency, and Sources

Rootstock leverages Avalara’s AvaTax Cross-Border for real-time customs duties and HS code mapping, ensuring tariff calculations are current and compliant.

Customization Potential

It provides flexibility in applying tariffs, whether through full landed cost configuration or via material overhead for quicker deployment. Scenario planning tools can be configured to fit unique financial modeling needs.

Complementary with Third-Party Tools

For firms already using trade compliance software, Rootstock ERP Tariff Management adds financial and operational planning capabilities within the ERP. However, firms in highly regulated sectors may will still need specialized compliance solutions.

Usability and User Adoption

It offers an intuitive UI and role-based training, but user adoption will depend on an organization’s digital maturity. Planning for adequate training and change management is essential.

Pricing Model and ROI Outlook

Rootstock ERP has a subscription-based model that scales based on usage. But existing customers with significant tariff exposure may realize a quicker ROI, while SMBs considering a new ERP can weigh the advantage of an ERP that helps manage the impact of tariffs.

Adaptability to Trade Policy Shifts

Rootstock ERP Tariff Management supports adaptability through its scenario planning and tariff simulation tools, which allow organizations to model the potential impact of policy changes before they take effect. This proactive approach enables sourcing and finance teams to evaluate cost implications, test pricing strategies, and make timely decisions in response to shifting tariffs.

Support Infrastructure

Rootstock provides comprehensive support, including SLAs and an evolving knowledge base. Buyers should assess the level of support offered to ensure alignment with their operational needs.

Observed Industry Trends

There’s a growing trend of embedding financial and sourcing tools related to tariffs directly into ERP platforms, reflecting the increasing cost visibility in operational strategy. Rootstock ERP Tariff Management supports this need, helping manufacturers stay competitive amid trade volatility.

Predictions: Where This Is Heading

As global trade continues to evolve, we can expect ERP systems like Rootstock ERP Tariff Management to incorporate more advanced features, such as AI-driven tariff agents for automated scenario analysis and recommendations.

Challenges & Considerations for Buyers

While the benefits are clear, companies must assess their specific needs, existing systems, and resource capabilities to ensure successful implementation and adoption of these new features.

FAQs

In a strategic move aimed at reducing administrative complexity and boosting compliance, Microsoft has unveiled a significant update to its Dynamics 365 licensing model. Announced on March 28, 2025, the initiative titled “Simplifying License Management in Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations” focuses on enhancing license visibility, increasing accountability, and enforcing clearer license allocation policies.

The update introduces new tools such as detailed license usage reporting, in-product notifications for unlicensed users, and stricter access control measures that will be gradually rolled out over the next few months. This initiative marks a clear shift in Microsoft’s approach towards operational transparency and governance in its enterprise software ecosystem.

Breaking Down the News: What’s Changing in Dynamics 365

Introduction of License Usage Reporting

Starting April 30, 2025, administrators using Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations will have access to a new license usage reporting feature. The team designed this tool to provide detailed insights into available, assigned, and unassigned user licenses within the organization.

Previously, many system admins had to rely on third-party tools or manual logs to manage license distribution, leading to inefficiencies and errors. With this native feature, Microsoft takes a direct step toward simplified license management, helping teams allocate resources more effectively and avoid unnecessary overhead.

In-Product Notifications for Unlicensed Users

Another update launching simultaneously on April 30 includes in-product messaging that notifies users if they are accessing the application without a proper license. These alerts will guide unlicensed users to reach out to their system administrators to resolve access issues.

This proactive measure not only minimizes unintentional license breaches but also encourages a culture of transparency and compliance. According to Microsoft, this feature is part of their commitment to “drive responsibility and reduce licensing-related friction between users and administrators.”

License Enforcement Coming August 30, 2025

Perhaps the most notable shift in policy is set to take place on August 30, 2025, when Microsoft will begin enforcing license assignments more strictly. Users attempting to access Dynamics 365 without a valid license will be blocked entirely from entering the platform.

This move signals Microsoft’s commitment to simplified license management while also reinforcing software licensing compliance. Organizations will be required to ensure that each user has an appropriate license in place or face immediate access disruption. AI solutions, ServiceNow ensures businesses can adopt AI automation with minimal configuration.

Why This Matters: Strategic Context Behind the Update

This update is not just a technical enhancement, it’s a strategic realignment. Microsoft is increasingly leaning into tools that offer simplified license management, reflecting a broader industry trend toward software asset optimization and automation.

As organizations grow, so does the complexity of managing user access, especially in large-scale enterprise environments. By simplifying visibility into license consumption and automating enforcement, Microsoft is addressing a long-standing pain point among IT leaders.

Implementation Timeline

To avoid business disruption, Microsoft is rolling out the changes in a phased manner:

• April 30, 2025 – Launch of license usage reporting and in-product notifications.
• August 30, 2025 – Enforcement of license compliance; unlicensed users will be denied access.

This staged approach gives organizations time to adapt, audit their current license allocations, and implement any necessary changes.

Analysts’ Take: Stakeholder Impact, Future Predictions & Unique Insights

Impact on Stakeholders

End Users: While the upcoming enforcement might be disruptive initially, it also ensures fairness and clarity in license usage. Users will have a clear path to resolving access issues through visible prompts.

System Administrators: The new features bring welcome relief. With automated tools for license reporting, admins can now monitor user licensing in real-time. This move supports smoother audits and reduces dependency on manual spreadsheets and guesswork.

Finance & Procurement Teams: For teams managing software spend, simplified license management means fewer surprises during renewals. Clear data on underused or over-assigned licenses will help optimize costs.

State of Microsoft After the Announcement

Microsoft‘s stock has remained stable following the announcement, reflecting investor confidence in the company’s long-term enterprise roadmap. The move is seen as a part of a broader push toward automation and operational intelligence across Microsoft’s cloud services, reinforcing its position as a dominant player in enterprise SaaS. By building features like simplified license management directly into its platform, Microsoft is setting a precedent for competitors and showing a commitment to continuous improvement.

Potential Challenges Ahead

Despite its promise, the new policy could face some hurdles:

• Initial Transition Pain: Organizations with poor license tracking practices may find the transition period challenging, particularly before the enforcement deadline.
• Access Disruptions: Businesses that fail to audit and allocate licenses properly could face system access denials, leading to potential operational delays.
• Customization Conflicts: Some enterprises with heavily customized Dynamics 365 environments may encounter compatibility issues with the new in-product notifications.

Future Outlook & Unique Predictions

• Increased Demand for Admin-Focused Features: As more enterprises adopt hybrid and remote work environments, expect Microsoft to roll out additional admin-friendly tools that enhance visibility and control over system usage.
• Rise of Auto-Remediation in Licensing: Microsoft may soon introduce auto-remediation workflows where unlicensed users are automatically assigned temporary licenses until a manual review occurs—aligning with the goal of simplified license management without access loss.
• Benchmarking Across Industry: It wouldn’t be surprising if similar licensing models and reporting mechanisms appear in other Microsoft products like Power Platform or Office 365, creating a unified compliance dashboard across services.

FAQs

Salesforce serves businesses of all sizes, offering an accessible entry point for startups while also excelling in handling complex CRM workflows. On the other hand, SAP C/4HANA is better suited for large enterprises, especially those already using the S/4 HANA suite as their central system—particularly in industries with strict regulatory demands.

For organizations building standalone CRM systems—common in non-ERP-centric sectors—Salesforce often proves to be the stronger option due to its flexible integration capabilities within broader marketing tech stacks. Conversely, SAP C/4HANA is a solid fit for industries like pharmaceuticals and medical devices, where CPQ workflows must adhere to rigorous compliance standards.

However, Salesforce may fall short for companies with highly specialized CRM needs, such as real estate firms or uniquely structured non-profits. In such cases, SAP C/4HANA’s robust security and deep customization capabilities offer greater control and flexibility for managing complex workflows.

Both platforms provide a full range of CRM features, including Sales Cloud, Marketing Cloud, Field Service, Customer Service, CPQ, and CDP. While SAP’s S/4 HANA excels in areas like omnichannel identity resolution and CPQ, it may underperform in customer service and IT service management (ITSM). Salesforce also supports these functions but they aren’t considered its core strengths.

Salesforce and SAP C/4 HANA each offer powerful eCommerce tools as part of their customer experience (Cx) suites, supporting both B2B and B2C operations. Nonetheless, customizing either platform typically requires considerable consulting support, as both lack the low- and no-code flexibility found in solutions aimed at smaller, less technical teams.

To further assess the strengths and limitations of Salesforce and SAP C/4 HANA, let’s explore their features and capabilities in more depth.

What Is Salesforce CRM?

Salesforce is a comprehensive CRM, especially designed for sales teams. It offers marketing automation through the Marketing Cloud. However, integration between sales and marketing can feel disconnected because the Marketing Cloud was acquired. Both Sales Cloud and Marketing Cloud are powerful on their own, meeting the needs of large enterprises. But, Salesforce’s complex data model and customization make it harder to use and implement than simpler platforms like HubSpot. Companies often need specialized consulting to customize Salesforce effectively.

Is Salesforce the right CRM for your industry, or do your unique processes require a more tailored solution? How well does its out-of-the-box functionality align with your sales, marketing, and post-sales workflows? Are licensing constraints or architectural complexities a potential roadblock for your team? While Salesforce offers powerful tools and a vast integration ecosystem—particularly for tech-driven B2B sectors—industries like manufacturing or real estate may find better alignment with alternative platforms. Before making a decision, it’s essential to evaluate technical fit, customization requirements, and potential vendor conflicts. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to gain deeper insights.

What Is SAP C/4 HANA CRM?

SAP C/4 HANA may not have the breadth or ecosystem reach of Salesforce, but it’s a strong choice for companies using SAP S/4 HANA. Its native integration with SAP’s suite offers seamless process continuity. However, its marketing automation features can be less intuitive, prompting many to use tools like HubSpot or Adobe Experience Cloud. The platform’s complex object model and deep customization require significant consulting. While it integrates well with SAP systems, it lacks pre-built industry editions, which can raise deployment costs and time, especially in sectors like banking or insurance.

Is your organization ready to handle SAP C/4HANA’s rigid processes and data model? Or would a more flexible CRM fit your needs better? Have you thought about the consulting effort and cost of integrating SAP with your current marketing and sales tools? While SAP excels in identity consolidation and CPQ for product-focused industries, does it fit your mobile and AI strategy? How important are ecosystem and seamless integration for your CRM success? Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce guide to explore these questions in depth.

Salesforce vs SAP C/4 HANA CRM Overall Comparison

Salesforce offers a flexible and expansive data model, making it suitable for industries with varied and complex workflows. Its ecosystem is widely adopted by MarTech vendors, positioning it as a top choice for integration-heavy environments. On the other hand, SAP C/4 HANA delivers enterprise-grade capabilities—particularly strong in CPQ and sales performance management—while also offering deep integration with SAP’s ERP tools. However, its marketing automation features are limited and often require external tools. Both platforms offer powerful territory and compensation planning but differ in ease of customization, pricing, and user-friendliness, especially for mid-sized businesses.

Does your organization need a CRM that integrates seamlessly with a wide range of marketing tools, or are you prioritizing deeper integration within an SAP-driven ecosystem? How important is intuitive customization versus robust enterprise-level configuration? Are mobile capabilities, AI integration, and predictable pricing major factors in your decision-making process? Understanding how these platforms align with your business processes, user needs, and growth trajectory is essential. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore the full comparison.

Salesforce vs SAP C/4 HANA CRM Module Comparison

Both platforms come equipped with a wide range of features aimed at optimizing business processes and improving operational efficiency. This feature comparison focuses on the unique strengths and capabilities of Salesforce and SAP C/4HANA CRM across key functional areas, offering valuable insights to support businesses in choosing the right CRM solution. Specifically, the section explores core modules, including marketing, sales, customer service, and e-commerce.

Marketing

Salesforce Marketing Cloud delivers a broad set of tools—including content creation, SEO optimization, social media management, email marketing, and advanced analytics—though some features may require technical support to implement effectively. In contrast, SAP C/4 HANA’s marketing capabilities are more limited, with a focus on email marketing and analytics but lacking dedicated support for content creation, SEO, and social media engagement. These differences highlight each platform’s strengths and the potential trade-offs depending on an organization’s specific marketing needs.

Does your marketing strategy rely heavily on built-in tools for content development, SEO, and social engagement? How critical is the ease of use versus depth of analytics in supporting your marketing campaigns? Are you equipped to handle additional technical overhead if your chosen platform requires more configuration? Understanding how each CRM platform supports your marketing function is key to making the right choice. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore these differences in full.

Sales

Salesforce provides a robust suite of sales tools, including advanced lead management with tracking, scoring, and nurturing features. It also offers a customizable sales pipeline, email tracking, meeting scheduling, and collaboration tools like Chatter to facilitate team communication. SAP C/4HANA, while not offering all these features natively, integrates well with other SAP platforms to provide comprehensive CRM capabilities. However, it does not have specific tools for lead management or meeting scheduling and relies on its Sales Order Management component for sales pipeline management.

When evaluating sales functionality, how important are advanced features like lead scoring, email tracking, and seamless collaboration for your sales team’s success? Do you need a highly customizable pipeline, or are simpler solutions sufficient? How does integration with other tools impact your decision, especially if your organization already uses SAP in other areas? Understanding the full scope of sales capabilities in both platforms is crucial for selecting the best fit for your business. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to gain a deeper understanding.

Customer Service

Salesforce offers a comprehensive suite of customer service features, including case management, ticketing, live chat, and customer support automation through its Service Cloud. Additionally, it supports omni-channel customer service, ensuring consistent experiences across different touchpoints. Similarly, SAP C/4HANA’s Service Cloud includes ticketing and live chat functionalities, as well as automation tools to enhance customer support. It also offers omnichannel support to maintain a seamless customer experience, though it may not have the same depth of features as Salesforce in some areas.

How important are automation tools and live chat capabilities in your customer service strategy? Does your business require comprehensive, omni-channel support, or would a more focused solution suffice? Are you looking for a platform that integrates smoothly with other business systems, or is a standalone solution more appropriate for your needs? Understanding these aspects can help determine the right CRM for your customer service requirements. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore these features in more detail.

E-commerce 

Salesforce provides a comprehensive suite of e-commerce features, including product catalog management, order fulfillment tools, and the ability to create personalized shopping experiences through its Commerce Cloud. Additionally, its analytics and customer data platforms support highly customized shopping journeys. On the other hand, SAP C/4HANA CRM offers robust tools for managing product catalogs and order fulfillment, leveraging components like SAP Commerce Cloud and SAP Marketing Cloud to streamline and automate the order processing experience. While both platforms provide personalized shopping experiences, SAP C/4HANA integrates customer data to tailor these experiences as well.

How critical is personalized shopping to your e-commerce strategy, and which platform better supports these tailored experiences? Do you require a solution with strong order fulfillment capabilities, or is product catalog management more important to your operations? How do the integration capabilities of each platform align with your existing e-commerce tools? Understanding the nuances of each system’s e-commerce features will help you determine the best choice for your business. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to dive deeper into these capabilities.

Salesforce vs SAP C/4 HANA CRM Pros

Salesforce is known for having one of the most comprehensive data models among best-of-breed CRMs. It also boasts a broad ecosystem and offers extensive customization options for enterprise use cases. On the other hand, SAP C/4HANA stands out with its seamless integration across SAP products, providing a unified experience for organizations using SAP S/4 HANA as their core. It also offers cross-channel personalization and strong identity management features. Additionally, it supports complex compliance workflows, such as those required by GDPR, CCPA, and LGPD, with audit-ready capabilities.

When evaluating these two platforms, how important is tight integration with your existing systems, particularly if you already use SAP products? Do you require a more customizable CRM to fit enterprise-specific workflows, or are you looking for a solution with broader cross-channel personalization and compliance features? How do the ecosystems of each platform align with your business needs? Understanding these distinctions can help you choose the CRM that will best support your organization’s objectives. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to explore these capabilities in detail.

Salesforce vs SAP C/4 HANA Cons 

Salesforce, while excellent for ad-hoc workflows, can be costly to customize and may not offer the same level of sophistication in pre-sales processes, such as marketing automation. Its data model can be restrictive for sales and marketing teams that need more fluidity to focus on sales rather than operational details. Additionally, it may not be the best fit for small to mid-size organizations or those requiring deep integration with ERP systems. On the other hand, SAP C/4HANA CRM, while robust, may feel unnatural or overly complex for smaller organizations. It also requires significant consulting support for customization, particularly when maintaining data layers and enabling the required workflows.

When considering the limitations of both platforms, how important is the ease of customization and adaptability to your business? Are you seeking a CRM solution that integrates seamlessly with your existing ERP systems, or is a more standalone option sufficient? How critical is a smooth pre-sales process, and how do you envision your team utilizing the CRM’s data model? Assessing these factors will help clarify which platform best suits your needs. Download the ultimate SAP CRM vs Salesforce comparison guide now to dive deeper into these challenges.

Download the Full Research Report