 
 
SAP maintains its dominance in the ERP market, largely due to its stronghold in the enterprise segment where deals are significantly larger compared to the mid-market. The architecture complementing the S/4 HANA Suite is particularly favored by enterprise-grade companies, offering leading products like SuccessFactors, Hybris, EWM, Ariba, and Concur. Contrastingly, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central serves as a logical choice particularly for companies outgrowing smaller ERP, MRP, and accounting systems like QuickBooks, Microsoft GP, Odoo, Katana, or Fulcrum.
For enterprise companies, SAP S/4 HANA often becomes a default choice due to high transaction volumes, stringent governance, and traceability needs. It particularly shines in product-centric enterprises requiring robust capabilities like MRP and allocation for global workloads. On the other hand, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is also ideal for companies with diversified, global operations aspiring to keep all of their entities in one database for easier reconciliation and tracking. SAP S/4 HANA excels in managing entities across multiple countries within a unified database, while the sweet spot for MS BC would be $30M-$250 in revenue and a higher revenue band for companies that might use MS BC just for accounting and financial reporting while using mature operational systems at the subsidiary level.
Choosing between SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. So, let’s explore further.
The 2024 Digital Transformation Report
Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 Business Central | |
| Started in | Pioneers of ERP | 2018 (Previously NAV) |
| Ownership by | SAP | Microsoft |
| No. of customers | 28,000+ | 60,000+ |
What is SAP S/4 HANA?
SAP S/4 HANA remains the top choice particularly for large enterprises with global needs and extensive localization requirements across multiple continents. In this league, its primary rival is Oracle. While alternatives like Unit4, IFS, or Deltek might handle the workload for larger enterprises, they often lack the robust global compliance and transactional capabilities that SAP S/4 HANA offers. Additionally, SAP S/4 HANA excels in providing superior transactional workflow capabilities that are purpose-built to streamline traceability for large and complex organizations.
Moreover, SAP S/4 HANA is an ideal choice for companies seeking a best-of-breed architecture tailored to the needs of specific functions. This architecture allows for operational cores on different ledgers, which is also crucial for larger distribution and 3PL companies managing complex WMS networks. Companies particularly with intricate HCM operations and stringent compliance requirements may find it necessary to integrate a best-of-breed system.
Additionally, for enterprises requiring sophisticated eCommerce platforms with components like CDP or CPQ, SAP S/4 HANA provides the essential capabilities. The flexibility and enterprise-grade best-of-breed architecture makes SAP S/4 HANA a standout solution for such diverse operational needs. Although, the cloud version may require additional third-party add-ons, similar to NetSuite. Nevertheless, organizations opting for the on-prem version can access superior capabilities, potentially outperforming other ERP systems.
What Is MS Dynamics 365 BC?
Rearchitected with cloud-native technologies, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is the SMB solution from Microsoft, globalized and also localized in most countries with a consulting base available virtually in any country or language. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central serves as a logical choice particularly for companies outgrowing smaller ERP, MRP, and accounting systems like QuickBooks, Microsoft GP, Odoo, Katana, or Fulcrum. It is positioned against competitors such as Netsuite, Sage Intacct, and Acumatica. It also offers a vibrant ecosystem with numerous add-ons catering to industry-specific needs.
The sweet spot for MS BC would be $30M-$250 in revenue and a higher revenue band for companies that might use MS BC just for accounting and financial reporting while using mature operational systems at the subsidiary level. The biggest advantage of MS BC is its consulting ecosystem and community support, which is much bigger than most ERP ecosystems, and that’s why it’s probably one of the most popular solutions across geographies.
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is also ideal for companies with diversified, global operations aspiring to keep all of their entities in one database for easier reconciliation and tracking. While the add-ons might allow companies to use Microsoft Dynamics Business Central for complex industrial operations, the natural design and core would be compatible with companies in industries such as non-profit, public sector, FMCG, F&B distribution, very light assembly manufacturing, telco, media, tech, energy, and utilities.
SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC Comparison
Navigating the choice between SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC across various critical dimensions.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC | |
| Global Operational Capabilities | Deeper multi-entity capabilities; widely installed globally. | Supported and actively installed in most countries globally. |
| Diverse Capabilities | Handles diverse business models; may require add-ons for deeper capabilities. | Supports multiple industries and business models. |
| Best-of-breed Capabilities | Pre-integrated enterprise apps; augmented by third-party add-ons. | Pre-integrated with Microsoft CRM and field service but relies on third-party add-ons for additional capabilities. |
| Last-mile Capabilities | Limited last-mile capabilities; may need add-ons for micro-verticals. | May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals. |
| Operational Functionalities | Enterprise-grade operational capabilities; industry-specific features limited. | Emphasizes core ERP capabilities, relying on partner add-ons for industry-specific capabilities. |
| Integration Capabilities | A&D-specific integrations not out-of-the-box. | Common data model, power platform and automate along with MS Azure platform for additional development and integration. |
| Manufacturing Capabilities | Complex capabilities; industry-specific limitations. | Lighter manufacturing capabilities than Acumatica. |
| Pricing Model | Named-user based | Per named user, per month. True consumption-based licenses can be adjusted without long-term contracts. |
| Key Modules | 1. Financial Management 2. Sales 3. Procurement 4. Manufacturing Management 5. Supply Chain Management 6. Professional Services Automation 7. CRM | 1. Financial Management 2. CRM 3. Distribution Management 4. Supply Chain Management 5. Project Accounting Management 6. Inventory Management 7. Reporting, Dashboard and BI |
SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC Feature Comparison
Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, manufacturing management, and business intelligence and reporting.
Financial Management Comparison
In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC | ||
| Financial Management | General Ledger | Can support the needs of even the most complex financial organizations with more than ten ledger rollups at the country level and conversions. | Initiates general ledger postings, chart of accounts, general journals, VAT facilities, recurring journals, and source codes. |
| Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable | Supports global collaboration of customers and vendors, including shared service model. | Automates accounts receivables and payables and facilitates seamless reconciliation of accounts for swift and precise financial reporting. | |
| Cash Flow Management | Complex treasury capabilities with the support for global operations, including maintaining treasury KPIs, workflows, and processes for dedicated treasury departments. | Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows. | |
| Currency Management | Can support complex currency workflows such as hedging and planning for current impact on different financial statements and accounts globally. | Manages multiple currencies across the system, including payables and receivables, general ledger reports, resource and inventory items, and bank accounts. | |
| Tax Management | Has built-in support for taxes in over 100 countries. | Offers automated, configurable, and scalable tax determination, calculation, and settlement capabilities, accommodating complex tax scenarios across various business requirements. |
Supply Chain Management Comparison
In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC | ||
| Supply Chain Management | Warehouse Management | Can support embedded or standalone architectural patterns along with complex business models such as 3PL or warehouse value-added services for third-party logistics. | Can be implemented in different complexity levels, depending on a company’s processes and order volume. The main difference is that activities are performed order-by-order in basic warehousing when they are consolidated for multiple orders in advanced warehousing. |
| Service Management | Can support complex quotes and service scheduling workflows of globally operated companies with large crews of field workers with scheduling dependencies of global operations. | Service management is not built as part of the core platform but a pre-integrated specialized app is available for field service operations | |
| Inventory Management | Robust inventory management capabilities accommodating many different business models and inventory types of complex, global organizations. | Ensures inventory availability by automatically computing stock levels, lead times, and reorder thresholds. Also, maintains optimal inventory levels by adjusting orders dynamically based on real-time inventory updates. | |
| Purchase Order Management | Complex purchase order management workflows with automated approval rules, multiple layers of hierarchies of global organizations with procurement processes integrated with project management, and MRP engines. | Manages purchase orders, including blanket orders and related processes. | |
| Requisition Management | Ability to manage complex requisition management processes of globally complex enterprises. | Organizes complex distribution processes involving multiple products and suppliers. |
Manufacturing Management Comparison
In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management ERP capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC | ||
| Manufacturing Management | Production Planning | One of the most complex planning capabilities with enterprise-grade strategies to optimize production cycles for global companies. | Enables the creation of production orders, definition of routings, allocation of resources, and optimization of production sequences, ensuring seamless operations. |
| BOM and Routing | Enterprise-grade BOM scalability for a variety of business models and products. | Allows for the detailed mapping of production processes, including the components, subassemblies, and resources used, as well as the sequence of operations. | |
| Advanced Planning and Scheduling | Enterprise-grade advanced APS capabilities for complex globally distributed planning workloads that need to be collaborated across geographies. | Takes into account all demand and supply data, nets the results, and creates suggestions for balancing the supply to meet the demand, ensuring optimized resource utilization and efficient production control. |
Business Intelligence and Reporting Comparison
In this comparison, we explore and analyze the business intelligence and reporting capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC | ||
| Business Intelligence and Reporting | Real-time Analytics and Dashboard | Enterprise-grade real-time analytics and dashboard capabilities. | Provides real-time visibility into overall support performance, allowing supervisors to monitor key operational metrics, make course corrections at the right time, and keep service levels high |
| Reporting | Enterprise-grade capabilities, with data exposed through many different technologies. | Provides an improved reporting and dashboard system that makes it easier to find and run the reports you need, and to analyze your data. |
Pros of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC
When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.Â
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC |
| It is an ideal solution as the corporate financial ledger for global companies with multiple layers of financial hierarchies operating in multiple countries. | Natively supports global regions and localizations where Acumatica, Epicor, or Infor might have limited support. |
| The item master, product model, and warehouse architecture can accommodate the needs of most manufacturing business models. | Unlike several products such as Acumatica, it has support for several European, Asian, and African countries where most products might struggle. |
| Because of the power of HANA, SAP S/4 HANA can process very complex MRP runs with product models containing millions of serial numbers and SKUs, making it much faster than most ERP systems. | The data model is friendlier for FMCG and distribution companies requiring native support for complex features such as bin tracking or license plate support. |
| Ideal fit for complex operations with its transactional maps capabilities built with the products, making debugging complex financial enterprises easier. | The product has been completely rearchitected using the cloud-native architecture. Cloud ERP capabilities are stronger than those of competing products. |
Cons of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC
Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC across various operational and financial dimensions.
| SAP S/4 HANA | MS Dynamics 365 BC |
| The controls provided as part of the product may feel unnecessary and overwhelming for smaller companies. | Only fit for FMCG-centric distributors. The industrial distribution would require add-ons to support capabilities. |
| Overbloated financial control processes, such as compliance, allocation, and approval flows, are only necessary for large organizations. | While the ecosystem may have options for distribution industries, it might not have integrations with the best-of-breed eCommerce systems in the industrial distribution space. |
| The data model is overwhelming for smaller organizations outgrowing QuickBooks or smaller ERP systems. | The financial traceability may not be as intuitive for global, publicly traded non-profit companies. |
| Despite advanced financial traceability and technical capabilities, the functional capabilities are not as rich as with its on-prem version. | The data layers are highly detailed, requiring substantial consulting help to be successful. |
| While SAP S/4 HANA has one of the best best-of-breed solutions, they might not be as pre-integrated as other solutions. | Microsoft doesn’t offer any support or control to its smaller products, leading to ERP implementation issues. |
| In industries where it might not be the most frequently installed as an operational solution, the other solutions are likely to have deeper last-mile capabilities. | While Microsoft Dynamics 365 BC has a vibrant marketplace to augment its core capabilities, the last-mile capabilities required for manufacturing or industrial distribution might be limited. |
Conclusion
In conclusion, the comparison between SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC offers valuable insights for businesses embarking on ERP selection projects. SAP S/4 HANA stands as the preferred choice particularly for large enterprises with extensive global needs, offering robust transactional workflow capabilities and best-of-breed architecture tailored to specific functions. With its comprehensive suite of products and superior transactional capabilities, SAP S/4 HANA also excels in managing entities across multiple countries within a unified database, making it an ideal solution for enterprises requiring complex operational support.
On the other hand, Microsoft Dynamics 365 BC emerges as a logical choice for SMBs and growing enterprises, particularly those outgrowing smaller ERP systems and seeking a unified database for diverse global operations. Its vibrant ecosystem and community support, coupled with the availability of industry-specific add-ons, make it a popular solution across geographies. While Dynamics 365 BC may require additional add-ons for deeper operational capabilities, its scalability and flexibility cater well to companies in industries such as non-profit, public sector, distribution, manufacturing, and more.
Ultimately, the choice between SAP S/4 HANA vs MS Dynamics 365 BC hinges on a detailed examination of the specific needs and requirements of each business. Thus, ensuring alignment with operational efficiency and strategic objectives. Hence, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.
+ 
ERP Implementation Failure Recovery
Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.
FAQs
Related Posts:
