Enterprise Architecture

This category contains articles related to enterprise architecture concepts. It touches enterprise architecture from many different perspectives including the conceptual understanding of the architecture, systems that need to be part of the architecture, and integration issues with best-of-breed architecture.

Understanding Unit4 ERP System Capabilities

WBSP581: Understanding Unit4 ERP System Capabilities – An Expert Review

Leave a Comment / Enterprise Architecture, ERP, High Tech & Electronics, Podcast, Uncategorized / By / June 22, 2024

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems , like those offered by Unit4 ERP are essential tools for businesses, offering a bundled suite of various software components. However, just combining different software offerings does not automatically make a collection an ERP. What determines this is the level of embeddedness of these components. Additionally, the components included within an ERP can vary depending on the industry.

Now while an ERP’s core requirements are finance and accounting, the approach differs across industries. For instance, some systems include Advanced Transportation Management, Financial Planning and Analysis, Product Lifecycle Management, Warehouse Management Systems, or Transportation Management Systems.

In this podcast, a panel of industry experts conducted an independent review of Unit4’s ERP System capabilities. They highlighted its unique suite approach, which includes ERP, Adaptive Case Management, Straight-Through Processing, and Financial Planning and Analysis. Let’s explore all these in detail, beginning with what the core of an ERP should be.

Core Components of an ERP

At its heart, an ERP must provide finance and accounting functionalities. However, the key difference lies in how these components are integrated. For example, some ERPs emphasize the integration of procurement and financial planning capabilities, while others might focus more on project management or human resources.

Service-Centric vs Product-Centric ERPs

ERPs can be broadly classified into two categories – service-centric and product-centric. These two types cater to very different business operations and have unique requirements:

  • Service-Centric ERPs

These ERP systems are designed specifically for service-centric industries, prioritizing service delivery rather than product distribution. Examples include professional services, the public sector, non-profit organizations, and higher education. In these industries, individual employees and their specific skills and schedules are crucial, making human capital management integration essential.

  • Product-Centric ERPs

These ERP systems cater to product-centric industries focused on manufacturing and distributing products. They require tight integration with supply chain management, warehouse management, and transportation management systems to ensure efficient production and distribution processes.

The Importance of Cross-Functional Integration

Cross-functional integration is the backbone of an effective ERP system. It ensures that different modules within the ERP can communicate and share data seamlessly. This integration is crucial for maintaining data integrity and providing a unified view of the organization’s operations. For service-centric industries, this includes tight integration of HCM (Human Capital Management) processes with financial and operational workflows.

For example, in industries like consulting, every individual’s specific expertise, certification, and availability need to be tracked carefully. This is essential for accurate project scheduling, resource allocation, and cost estimation. Unit4 ERP System capabilities excels in this aspect, making it a strong contender in the service-centric ERP market.

On the other hand, in product-centric industries, integration between ERP and supply chain processes is more critical.

Unit4 ERP Capabilities – The Unique Approach

Unit4 ERP system capabilities are comprehensive suite, particularly for service-centric industries, such as professional services, the public sector, not-for-profit, and higher education. Their approach ensures that all critical business functions are seamlessly integrated, providing a full view of the organization’s operations. Their suite are not limited to the following:

  • ERP

Core financial and accounting functionalities

  • HCM

Human Capital Management to handle your people processes, simplify and increase the accuracy of your payroll, and more.

  • FM&A

Unit4 Financials by Coda offers integrated financial management and accounting solutions for full control and visibility of the entire record-to-report cycle.

  • FP&A

Financial Planning and Analysis for detailed budgeting and agile data-driven forecasting.

  • S2C

Enhanced procurement capabilities, especially after acquiring Scanmarket, which added strategic sourcing and contract lifecycle management functionalities.

Comparing Unit4 ERP System with Other Service-Centric ERPs

  • Workday

Similar to Unit4, Workday integrates HCM with finance and procurement, making it a strong competitor in the service-centric ERP market. It started as an HCM solution and later added financial management capabilities.

  • NetSuite

Offers a broader range of functionalities, including support for product-centric processes, but is also strong in service-centric verticals.

  • FinancialForce

Another ERP focused on Professional Services Automation built on the Salesforce platform. It offers finance and PSA but lacks comprehensive HCM integration.

  • Sage Intacct

Targets service-centric verticals with a focus on finance and accounting but lacks the comprehensive suite offered by Unit4.

  • Blackbaud

Caters to the SMB segment focusing on non-profits, offering a slightly different approach than Unit4’s mid-market focus.

Features and Acquisitions of Unit4

Unit4 has expanded its capabilities through strategic acquisitions. For example, the acquisition of Scanmarket brought advanced procure-to-pay (P2P) functionalities into its suite. P2P is essential for managing procurement processes from requisition to payment, ensuring transparency and control over organizational spending.

User Experience and Flexibility Of Unit4 ERP

Unit4’s ERP system stands out for its user-centric design and flexibility. It adapts to the specific needs of its users, providing intuitive interfaces and customizable workflows. This is particularly beneficial for service-centric industries where flexibility in handling complex processes and projects is crucial. The system’s ability to adapt to changing business needs without requiring significant reconfiguration makes it a preferred choice for dynamic organizations.

Unit4 ERP Integration with Emerging Technologies

Unit4 has also integrated emerging technologies like AI and machine learning into its ERP suite. These technologies enhance decision-making by providing predictive analytics and insights, automating routine tasks, and improving overall operational efficiency. For instance, AI-driven analytics in the FP&A module can help organizations forecast financial performance more accurately, identify trends, and make informed strategic decisions.

Conclusion

Unit4 stands out as a leading ERP system for service-centric industries, offering a comprehensive suite that includes ERP, ACM, STP, and FP&A. Its ability to provide deep integration across these functions makes it a powerful tool for organizations where individual skills and detailed financial planning are crucial. By addressing the unique requirements of service-centric industries, Unit4 ensures that businesses can operate efficiently and effectively, making it a valuable asset in the ERP market.

Whether you’re a professional services firm, a non-profit, or part of the public sector, understanding the strengths and capabilities of Unit4 can help you make informed decisions about your ERP needs.

MS Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / June 11, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O stands out for its enhanced cloud-native functionality, leading in capabilities over competitors like SAP S/4 HANA and Oracle Cloud ERP. It caters to large, global companies with complex business models, offering mature technology and a successful track record across industries. In contrast, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. It is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range.

Dynamics 365 F&O is ideal for companies with diverse global entities, spanning industries like manufacturing, distribution, and construction. Whereas, Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. However, navigating the Dynamics 365 ecosystem may require assistance due to the presence of unqualified partners. Similarly, while Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies.

Choosing between Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

MS Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now
MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Started inOne of the most established enterprise software companies in the world2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership byMicrosoftKoch Industries
No. of customers 50,000+1000+

What is Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (F&O)?

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O is often the third choice for larger global accounts, following SAP S/4 HANA and Oracle Cloud ERP. It offers a mature ecosystem with modern, cloud-native technologies, thus proving successful across various industries. It is perhaps the most diverse solution accommodating several global business models in one database, making it an ideal solution particularly for lower enterprise companies. While a great fit as a corporate ledger for large enterprises, it’s not as proven as other leading solutions in the enterprise market with workloads as high as millions of journal entries per hour that Fortune 1000 companies might demand.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O also excels in localizations where other solutions may falter. A vibrant ecosystem makes it suitable for private equity and holding companies aiming to streamline their portfolio companies on one solution. SMBs, however, might find its complex data model overwhelming. Large, complex global companies particularly with revenues exceeding $1B will find Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O appealing.

Although Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations lacks the operational depth of specialized solutions, larger companies favor its corporate-level financial control. In a two-tier setting, they often utilize additional Dynamics 365 F&O add-ons like Adeaca for operational requirements. Furthermore, MS365 F&O offers seamless integration for field service, HCM, and CRM at the database level, empowering large companies to construct a best-of-breed architecture. It is especially strong with WBS-centric processes covering operational and financial schedules equally well. The challenge with MS Dynamics 365 F&O would be the best-of-breed ancillary system, which are not owned and maintained by Microsoft, requiring third-party add-ons.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Infor CloudSuite LN is a complete product suite to meet the needs of an enterprise particularly similar to Epicor, SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. Infor is also perhaps the only vendor after the larger ones that has the capabilities to build best-of-breed architecture akin to SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft. In fact, Infor might have deeper capabilities than Microsoft in some areas with pre-integrated best-of-breed solutions such as Infor WFM and Nexus. Infor is also the only vendor that can provide depth in several industries while not struggling with the transactional processing requirements of large accounts.

Infor LN is particularly ideal for discrete manufacturing companies. It is successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Positioned for companies surpassing entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, this solution delivers mature capabilities particularly for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. They might also include business operations such as plastic or chemicals as part of their automotive operations. Despite limitations in broader capabilities compared to other vanilla solutions, recent upgrades acknowledge its broader application in various automotive business models.

Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions.

MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational CapabilitiesCan host multiple entities from different countries.Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse CapabilitiesCan accommodate most business models, may require add-ons.Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed CapabilitiesCrucial capabilities such as PLM, etc, may not be pre-integrated.HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational FunctionalitiesRich operational functionality for large enterprises.Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration CapabilitiesPre-integrated with CRM and field service.Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities Mature capabilities support diverse models.This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing ModelCost per user per month with flexible user management, without long-term commitment.Subscription-based
Key Modules1. Financial Management
2. Supply Chain Management
3. Manufacturing Management
4. Human Capital Management
5. Business Intelligence and Reporting
6. Security and Compliance
7. Develop and Customize
8. System Administration		1. Financials
2. Human Resources
3. Manufacturing Management
4. Inventory Management
5. Purchasing Management
6. Quality Management
7. Sales Management
8. Product Technology

Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Financial ManagementGeneral LedgerCreates and maintains accurate records for financial transactions and generates regular financial reports.The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
Accounts Receivable and Accounts PayableAutomates workflows for managing vendor invoices, payments, and customer invoicing, streamlining the entire invoicing process and improving cash flow management.AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
Cash Flow ManagementProvides comprehensive cash flow forecasting capabilities, allowing to project future cash positions, identify potential shortfalls, and make informed decisions.Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
Other FearturesChart of Accounts – Enables the creation of a hierarchical structure for categorizing financial information.Currency Management – The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
Budgeting and Forecasting – Creates and manages budgets across different departments and business units. Also, leverages historical data and predictive analytics, to make accurate projections and align their financial strategies with business goals.Tax Management – Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain ManagementWarehouse ManagementProvides advanced warehouse and transportation management features, including inventory tracking, order fulfillment, shipment planning, and real-time visibility into logistics operations.Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
Service ManagementEstablishes service agreements and service subscriptions, handles service orders and customer inquiries, and manages and analyzes the delivery of services to customers.Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
Inventory Management Offers real-time visibility into inventory levels, demand, and supply, enabling organizations to optimize their inventory planning, reduce stockouts, and improve customer satisfaction.Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
Other FeaturesProcurement and Sourcing – Streamlines the procurement process by providing end-to-end visibility and control over purchasing activities. Also automates and optimizes the procurement workflows, reducing costs and improving supplier relationships.Purchase Order Management – Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
Transportation Management – Offers real-time visibility into logistics operations.Sales Order Management – They are utilized to sell and deliver items or services to a sold-to business partner under specific terms and conditions, originating from various sources like Contracts, Quotations, EDI, and Planning.
Demand Planning and Forecasting – Generates accurate demand forecasts, helping organizations optimize production planning, inventory levels, and procurement decisions.Requisition Management – Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing ManagementProduction Planning Provides comprehensive production planning and control capabilities, allowing organizations to optimize their manufacturing processes. The system supports various production scenarios, including make-to-order, make-to-stock, and engineer-to-order, while providing real-time visibility into production schedules, resource allocation, and material requirements.One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
Shop Floor Management – Offers real-time monitoring of shop floor activities, capturing data on machine utilization, labor productivity, and production progress.BOM and Routing – It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
Product Lifecycle Management – Enables organizations to manage the entire product lifecycle, from design and engineering to manufacturing and after-sales service. The system integrates product data, engineering change orders, and quality management processes, ensuring seamless collaboration and visibility across different departments.Advanced Planning and Scheduling – Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Has a significant advantage in its extensive consulting base and a vibrant marketplace, a unique benefit unmatched by many ERP systems.Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Supports global operations and business models and pre-baked integration for the best-of-breed CRM and field service solutions.It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
Embedded WMS and TMS processes help companies that might require end-to-end traceability even after the good leaves the dock.Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Legacy product rearchitected for the cloud. So, while better than other legacy products that might be behind in the cloud. May not have as superior user experience as required.While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

MS Dynamics 365 F&OInfor CloudSuite LN
Overwhelming for smaller companies with the configuration and approval flows built for large enterprises.The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
Might not be able to match the performance expectations of larger organizations where processing millions of journal entries per hour is required.Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
Overbloated financial control processes, such as compliance, allocation, and approval flows, which are only necessary for large organizations.Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
May require consulting assistance to navigate the channel, given the presence of unqualified ISVs and VARs.The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Integration with A&D-specific PLMs, configurators, and CPQ systems is not out-of-the-box, increasing the implementation time and costs.The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
The last-mile capabilities for specific A&D verticals, such as integration with GovCon processes and databases, may require solutions from third parties or custom integration, making the implementation overly expensive.Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O and Infor LN offer robust and comprehensive ERP solutions tailored to different market needs and business complexities. Dynamics 365 F&O particularly excels in providing a diverse, cloud-native environment suitable for large, global companies with intricate financial and operational requirements. Its extensive consulting base, rich ecosystem, and seamless integration with other Microsoft solutions make it a preferred choice particularly for large enterprises and private equity firms managing diverse portfolios. However, its complexity and scale might overwhelm smaller organizations or those with simpler operational models.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN shines in the upper mid-market segment, particularly for companies with revenues between $250M and $750M, focusing on discrete manufacturing and intricate supply chain operations. Its pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, and advanced supply chain planning, offer mature capabilities particularly for complex manufacturing environments. Despite its strengths, Infor LN may face challenges in process-centric operations and lacks the extensive cloud-native features and user experience offered by newer solutions. Ultimately, the choice between Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN hinges on a detailed assessment of specific business needs, operational complexities, and also long-term strategic goals. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / June 11, 2024

NetSuite caters to globally dispersed small to mid-market firms, offering robust financial capabilities and localization across many countries. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. NetSuite suits diverse businesses, including service-centric, distribution-centric, and B2C organizations. Meanwhile, Infor CloudSuite LN is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range.

NetSuite targets firms with revenues between $10M and $1B, emphasizing stronger financial capabilities. Whereas, Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. NetSuite supports lighter manufacturing and consumer products, particularly in health, beauty, fashion, and CPG. While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies.

Choosing between NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now
NetSuiteInfor CloudSuite LN
Started in19982006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership byOracle in 2016Koch Industries
No. of customers 37,000+1000+

What is NetSuite?

NetSuite stands out as the leading ERP solution, driven by its success for diverse industries particularly seeking stronger financial capabilities over the operational, robust ecosystem, credible marketplace add-ons, and comprehensive functionality. Although not as complex as some competitors like SAP S/4 HANA and Microsoft F&O, NetSuite excels in supporting diverse business models, including omnichannel architecture, matrix/dimensional inventory, and subscription-based models.

While NetSuite excels across industries, it may not be the ideal choice for industrial distributors and manufacturers due to limitations in pricing and item master capabilities. Its strength lies in supporting lighter manufacturing and consumerized products particularly health and beauty, fashion, apparel, and CPG. With robust financial capabilities and an integrated HCM solution, NetSuite is well-suited for service-centric industries, including smaller banks, credit unions, financial services, non-profit organizations, as well as the technology and media sectors.

While NetSuite remains the top-ranked solution due to its product quality, there might be challenges with over-customization and integration issues, leading to implementation failures. Thus, working with NetSuite demands thorough vetting of their solution and architecture.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Infor CloudSuite LN is a complete product suite to meet the needs of an enterprise similar to Epicor, SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. Infor is also perhaps the only vendor after the larger ones that has the capabilities to build best-of-breed architecture akin to SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft. In fact, Infor might have deeper capabilities than Microsoft in some areas with pre-integrated best-of-breed solutions such as Infor WFM and Nexus. Infor is also the only vendor that can provide depth in several industries while not struggling with the transactional processing requirements of large accounts.

Infor LN is ideal for discrete manufacturing companies. It is successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Positioned for companies surpassing entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, this solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. They might also include business operations such as plastic or chemicals as part of their automotive operations. Despite limitations in broader capabilities compared to other vanilla solutions, recent upgrades acknowledge its broader application in various automotive business models.

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions.

NetSuiteInfor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational CapabilitiesHandles global multi-entity operations but not suitable for enterprise workloads.Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse CapabilitiesFavors B2C, hospitality, and service-centric industries.Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed CapabilitiesContains pre-integrated HCM and FP&A components with varying maturity.HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities Limited last-mile capabilities, especially for manufacturing.Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational FunctionalitiesRicher financial capabilities over operational features.Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration CapabilitiesOffers several pre-integrated solutions with more options from Celigo.Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities Limited BOM layers for assembly-centric operations, requiring additional add-ons.This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing ModelNamed-user based with inflexible long-term contracts.Subscription-based
Key Modules1. Financial Management
2. Accounting
3. Global Business Management
4. Inventory Management
5. Order Management
6. Supply Chain Management
7. Warehouse Management
8. Procurement
9. Customer Relationship Management		1. Financials
2. Human Resources
3. Manufacturing Management
4. Inventory Management
5. Purchasing Management
6. Quality Management
7. Sales Management
8. Product Technology

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management and supply chain management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

NetSuiteInfor CloudSuite LN
Financial ManagementGeneral LedgerSupports complex general ledgers including public reporting requirements of several countriesThe General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
Accounts Receivable and Accounts PayableAutomates and streamlines invoice delivery, payment processing, and collections management as well as accounts payable processes.AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
Cash Flow ManagementProvides visibility to optimize cash flows, monitor bank accounts, and manage liquidity.Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
Tax ManagementManages domestic and global tax, generates detailed reports, and analyzes transactions real-time.Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

NetSuiteInfor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain ManagementWarehouse ManagementProvides the ability to optimize day-to-day warehouse operations, eliminate manual processes and minimize handling costs.Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
Inventory Management Automates inventory management processes with multi-location fulfilment, cycle counting, replenishment, traceability and item visibility.Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control.
Procurement Streamlines procurement processes with source management, purchase management, vendor management and invoice processing.Manages purchase activities and maintains the resulting data.
Supply Chain Planning Provides the ability to analyze demand, determine replenishment requirements, add stock and create orders according to an up-to-date supply plan.Supplies planning capabilities are one of the robust for global manufacturing operations including most of the Supply Chain suite components pre-integrated as part of the suite.
Supply Chain ExecutionOptimizes all supply chain assets, controls costs at each step.Supplies execution capabilities are one of the robust for global manufacturing operations including most of the Supply Chain execution components pre-integrated as part of the suite.

Pros of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

NetSuiteInfor CloudSuite LN
Provides richer financial capabilities over operational, with leaner operational layers built with the product.Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Ideal for SMBs operating in different countries.It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
The data model is B2C friendly, supporting integration with B2C channels.Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Ideal for eCommerce-centric SMBs because of the ecosystem and the integration operations available for eCommerce-centric companies.While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of NetSuite vs. Infor CloudSuite LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with NetSuite vs. Infor CloudSuite LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

NetSuiteInfor CloudSuite LN
Not a great value for companies operating only in a few countries.The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
May struggle with transactional workload requirements of companies over $1B and the ones that might be acquiring 10-20 entities every year.Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
Not ideal for startups with simpler operating models.Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
Named-user-based pricing requires allocating fixed costs, even for seasonal workers or external users accessing the subset of data such as customer or vendor portals.The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Not fit for companies seeking OEM-owned integration with core operational systems such as CAD or PLM.The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
The last-mile capabilities required for manufacturing or industrial distribution are extremely limited.Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

​​In conclusion, choosing between NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN depends significantly on a company’s specific needs and operational focus. NetSuite excels for small to mid-market firms with global operations, offering strong financial capabilities and localization features that suit diverse industries, including service-centric, distribution-centric, and B2C organizations. Its strengths lie in supporting lighter manufacturing and consumer products, particularly in sectors like health, beauty, fashion, and CPG. However, NetSuite may not be ideal for industrial distributors and manufacturers due to its limitations in pricing and item master capabilities. Despite its robust financial management, the complexity of implementation and potential over-customization issues necessitate careful consideration.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN is tailored for more intricate manufacturing and distribution operations, making it a superior choice for upper mid-market companies with revenues ranging from $250M to $750M. It offers a comprehensive suite experience similar to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade functionalities including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. While Infor LN is excellent for discrete manufacturing, it faces challenges with process-centric operations and may not be the best fit for companies requiring extensive global capabilities or those in process manufacturing. Thus, further exploration and evaluation are essential to determine the best-fit ERP solution for a company’s unique needs. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / June 11, 2024

Acumatica stands out among three cloud-native ERP vendors particularly focusing on small and medium-sized businesses, alongside NetSuite and Sage Intacct. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. It is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Acumatica, however, caters well to companies with revenues ranging from $10-100 million, offering limited native localization features yet suitable synergies for global operations. 

Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. Whereas, Acumatica’s strength lies in its multi-branch capabilities and tailored support for various business models such as manufacturing, distribution, construction, and field service. 

While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. On the other hand, Acumatica serves as an excellent entry-level system for companies transitioning from QuickBooks or smaller point systems seeking seamless cross-functional integration. Choosing between Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now
AcumaticaInfor CloudSuite LN
Started in20082006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership byEQT Partners in 2019Koch Industries
No. of customers 10,000+1000+

What is Acumatica?

Acumatica is one of three cloud-native ERP solutions particularly similar to NetSuite and Sage Intacct. It has extensive multi-branch capabilities, particularly making it friendlier for retail-centric operations. It can also host multiple business models as part of the same database spanning manufacturing, distribution, construction, and field service. Thus, making it friendlier for diverse manufacturing or distribution-centric operations. Because of its limited global operational capabilities, it primarily targets US and UK-based companies. Thus, positioned as an ideal choice for companies within the $10-100 million revenue range, the majority of Acumatica’s customer base falls under this category.

Desiring a user experience akin to Odoo or Quickbooks, Acumatica ERP also offers versatility to accommodate various business models: distribution, manufacturing, or construction-focused. Although Acumatica has limitations in mature features like dimensional inventory or allocation, it is an excellent initial system for companies looking to streamline inventory or costs. With transactional processing and some mature capabilities, such as batch transactional processing, Acumatica is positioned as a valuable choice for businesses venturing into their first or second ERP solution.

Acumatica ERP is a fit for companies seeking cloud-native experience, particularly emphasizing features like enterprise search and mobility over deeper operational capabilities. Despite its focus on small businesses, Acumatica lacks robust globalization and localization features, catering to a limited number of countries by default. This simplicity, however, benefits smaller companies by avoiding unnecessary layers of multi-entity operations. Although targeting small businesses, Acumatica ERP surpasses Odoo or Zoho with the flexibility of its data layers, necessitating consulting help for implementation. The perceived benefit of Acumatica’s pricing is also a challenge, as it’s notoriously difficult to understand and predict.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Infor CloudSuite LN is a complete product suite to meet the needs of an enterprise similar to Epicor, SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. Infor is also perhaps the only vendor after the larger ones that has the capabilities to build best-of-breed architecture akin to SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft. In fact, Infor might have deeper capabilities than Microsoft in some areas with pre-integrated best-of-breed solutions such as Infor WFM and Nexus. Infor is also the only vendor that can provide depth in several industries while not struggling with the transactional processing requirements of large accounts.

Infor LN is ideal for discrete manufacturing companies. It is successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Positioned for companies surpassing entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, this solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. They might also include business operations such as plastic or chemicals as part of their automotive operations. Despite limitations in broader capabilities compared to other vanilla solutions, recent upgrades acknowledge its broader application in various automotive business models.

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions.

AcumaticaInfor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational CapabilitiesLimited multi-entity capabilities.Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse CapabilitiesOperationally rich for smaller companies.Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed CapabilitiesLimited, relying on third-party add-ons.HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational FunctionalitiesEmphasizes cloud-native experience but offers deeper operational capabilities and integration for smaller operations in fewer countries.Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration CapabilitiesNatively-integrated WMS functionality, lacks pre-integrated best-of-breed CRM, supports only embedded CRM.Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities Suitable for light manufacturing, limited mature capabilities such as allocation and Kanban.This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing ModelConsumption-based, named, and concurrent but requires long-term contracts.Subscription-based
Key Modules1. Financial Management
2. Construction Management
3. CRM
4. Distribution Management
5. Service Management
6. Manufacturing Management 
7. Project Accounting Management
8. Payroll
9. Retail e-Commerce Management
10. Reporting, Dashboard and BI		1. Financials
2. Human Resources
3. Manufacturing Management
4. Inventory Management
5. Purchasing Management
6. Quality Management
7. Sales Management
8. Product Technology

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

AcumaticaInfor CloudSuite LN
Financial ManagementGeneral LedgerDesigned to support ledgers limited to support one country. Limited multi-ledger capabilities.The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
Accounts Receivable and Accounts PayableThe AR and AP might be limited to just one country with limited synergies among vendors from different countries.AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
Cash Flow ManagementManages day-to-day transactions, cash balances, funds transfers, and bank account reconciliations for smaller operations.Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
Currency ManagementCreates estimates for new or existing items, convert to bills of material, production orders.The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
Tax ManagementProvides centralized tax configuration, management, and reporting.Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

AcumaticaInfor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain ManagementWarehouse ManagementProvides real-time inventory visibility and streamlines warehouse operations.Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
Service ManagementEnables quick service needs capture, assignment, and real-time tracking, with features like contract management and appointment schedules.Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
Inventory Management Simplifies inventory processes with flexible item management and quality traceability.Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
Purchase Order ManagementStreamlines procurement processes with policy enforcement and process controls.Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
Sales Order ManagementCentrally manages sales activities and tracks prices and inventory.They are utilized to sell and deliver items or services to a sold-to business partner under specific terms and conditions, originating from various sources like Contracts, Quotations, EDI, and Planning.
Requisition ManagementOrganizes complex distribution processes involving multiple products and suppliers.Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

AcumaticaInfor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing ManagementProduction Planning Assists manufacturers in addressing production demand with the agility to adjust to fluctuating schedules, unforeseen equipment malfunctions, delayed deliveries from suppliers, and other unexpected occurrences affecting operations on the factory floor.One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
BOM and RoutingLets you efficiently plan and manage inventories, costs and manufacturing processes.It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
Advanced Planning and SchedulingLets you create a more streamlined and accurate production scheduled, better enforce delivery dates and optimize for capacity.Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

Acumatica Infor CloudSuite LN
Great 1st or 2nd ERP choice particularly due to limited layers and mature capabilities for larger companies.Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Accommodates different business models spread in fewer countries under one database.It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
Great fit for SMB B2B businesses with complex product mixes.Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Born in the cloud with consistent design principles across the application.While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

Acumatica Infor CloudSuite LN
Limited capabilities when multiple countries with different currencies and sub-ledgers need to be hosted as part of the same solution.The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
Not fit for companies with over $100 million in revenue.Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
The mobile capabilities are leaner for complex reporting scenarios such as parallel processing or reporting labor.Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
Consumption-based pricing requires consulting expertise to estimate transactions as the pricing is not as predictable.The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Multiple add-ons such as MES, PLM, and quality, posing integration and communication challenges with the core systems required for complex manufacturing.The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
The last-mile capabilities required for manufacturing or industrial distribution may not as strong as purpose-built solutions such as Infor or Epicor but comparable to vanilla solutions such as SAP S/4 HANA.Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Acumatica emerges as a compelling choice among cloud-native ERP vendors, catering particularly to small and medium-sized businesses with its versatile capabilities. Positioned alongside NetSuite and Sage Intacct, Acumatica offers flexibility and multi-branch support, making it ideal for companies with revenues ranging from $10-100 million. However, it falls short in providing robust global operational features, limiting its suitability for companies with expansive international operations.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems, offering mature capabilities tailored for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. With a suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, Infor LN delivers enterprise-grade functionalities across various modules such as PLM, WMS, WFM, and BI. While it excels in discrete manufacturing, it may face challenges in certain scenarios, particularly with process-centric operations.

Ultimately, the choice between Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN hinges on a detailed examination of business requirements and operational needs. Both solutions offer distinct advantages and limitations, making this comparison an invaluable resource for organizations embarking on ERP selection projects. Thus, further exploration and evaluation are essential to determine the best-fit ERP solution for a company’s unique needs. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

Top 10 Companies Not Independent ERP Consultants In 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / May 27, 2024

“Independent” is the latest buzzword in the ERP industry. While many companies claim independence, not all fully comprehend how the independent ERP consulting business model works. In this blog, we will delve into the top 10 companies that are not independent ERP consultants, which constitutes a rather unique business model. So, let’s explore further.

In the realm of ERP projects, you’ll encounter various companies. It’s often amusing because some companies may sell their own software while asserting independence. Alternatively, there are scenarios where companies are affiliated with vendors yet claim independence despite reselling their software. 

Top 10 Companies Not Independent ERP Consultants In 2024

Such claims may be supported by arguments that vendors don’t directly compensate them, hence claiming independence. However, when seeking an independent ERP consultant, it’s crucial to engage a vendor-agnostic consultant. Their lack of affiliation should be evident in their marketing materials. Therefore, paying attention to this distinction is imperative. This list aims to elucidate the diverse companies involved in the ERP industry and their differing approaches. Let’s examine the list now.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

10. Affiliate Marketing Companies

Business Model. When considering affiliate marketing companies, it’s important to note that they may not have affiliations with ERP vendors. However, their business model revolves around selling leads based on their content marketing authority. Typically lacking ERP implementation experience, they often echo the narratives provided by ERP vendors, relying on them for expertise. 

Their Role with ERP Projects. During your ERP journey, you’ll encounter various affiliate marketing companies claiming to aid in vendor selection or RFP processes. However, their insights are often limited, particularly regarding implementation aspects such as integration design. This limitation frequently leads to ERP implementation issues. 

Their Tendency to Underestimate the Expertise Required for ERP Selection. Even if the right product is identified, failure to define architecture during the selection phase or address change management issues can still result in complications. Therefore, it’s important to recognize that affiliate marketing companies do not necessarily offer the same independence as independent ERP consultants.

9. Supply Chain Consulting Companies

Business Model. Supply chain consulting companies are business consulting firms that specialize in supply chain operations. Their typical business model involves engaging with supply chain teams, delving deep into supply chain matters but not necessarily from an ERP perspective.

Their Limited Perspective and Potential Affiliation. While they may have utilized ERP systems and implemented supply chain processes within them, this doesn’t provide them with a comprehensive perspective combining all functions. Additionally, they may lack independence and could be affiliated with ERP, WMS, or CMS vendors, restricting their interactions to vendors within their ecosystem. 

Their Tendency to Underestimate the Expertise Required for ERP Selection. Therefore, supply chain consulting companies may not always function as independent ERP consultants. They are suitable for addressing specific, departmental supply chain issues but may not be the best fit for defining ERP selection processes or aiding in ERP system selection and implementation. Their focus tends to be more on supply chain aspects, which may not suffice for comprehensive ERP needs.

8. Software Publishers or OEMs

Business Model. The business model for software publishers or OEMs revolves around selling licenses, with a primary focus on revenue generation through license sales. While they may assert having implementation expertise, their core objective is to sell licenses. Some OEMs may operate through their own reseller or consulting channels, but their primary goal remains license sales.

Free Advice Potentially Biased. As their profitability hinges on selling their software, they are inherently not independent. Despite claims of independence, OEMs may not exclusively specialize in ERP; they could also be ISV or e-commerce vendors. While they may offer assistance with ERP selection, their analyses typically favor their own products, processes, and methodologies.

Unspoken Alliances of the Enterprise Software World. It’s common for businesses to prioritize maintaining a good relationship with their OEMs, especially since they rely on their software. However, OEMs often recommend companies within their ecosystem or trusted channels, potentially limiting impartiality. Therefore, while businesses may collaborate with OEMs, they should recognize that OEMs do not function as independent ERP consultants.

7. Marketing Agencies

Business Model. Marketing agencies encompass various entities specializing in marketing, branding, SEO, and e-commerce. Typically, they collaborate with a company’s marketing department, promising extensive experience in enhancing sales through marketing efforts.

Their Limited Perspective and Affiliations. While they may offer assistance with ERP selection and implementation, their perspective often remains siloed, similar to supply chain consulting companies. Additionally, they may have affiliations with multiple vendors to promote alongside existing platforms, making them inherently non-independent. 

Their True Expertise. It’s advisable to engage with marketing agencies when you need help with specific marketing challenges at the departmental level. However, they may not be the most suitable choice as an independent ERP consultant for ERP selection and implementation processes.

6. Executive Freelance Consultants

Business Model. Executive freelance consultants, often comprising former executives or board members, possess valuable industry experience, including ERP consulting.

Limited Cycles Under Their Belt. They may engage in freelance work during career transitions, seeking part-time or contract-based opportunities. Despite their expertise, they may lack extensive experience due to fewer engagement cycles and potential vendor affiliations, challenging their claims of being independent ERP consultants. 

Insider Secrets Requires a “Rat”. Their business model may not prioritize ERP selection and implementation, limiting their understanding of industry dynamics, negotiation strategies, and risk mitigation. While they can offer valuable assistance in addressing specific business process issues, they may not be the optimal choice for ERP selection and implementation endeavors.

5. Lean Manufacturing Consultants 

Business Model. Lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 consultants share similarities with marketing and supply chain consultants, as their focus tends to be biased towards shop floor manufacturing. While efficiency in manufacturing is crucial for success, it’s essential to recognize the importance of all departments in ERP projects.

Their Blind Spots. Ensuring representation of everyone’s interests, even if not equally, is vital to understanding how decisions impact workflows across the organization. Failure to conduct such analysis may lead to planning, forecasting, costing, integration, and reconciliation issues. 

Their Superpowers. While these consultants specialize in lean processes, their ERP system experience varies. Even if they claim ERP implementation expertise, it’s crucial to consider the breadth of their experience. Collaborating with them is beneficial when addressing specific manufacturing or lean-related issues. However, they may not possess the expertise as an independent ERP consultant required for ERP selection and implementation.

4. System Integrators

Business Model. System integrators or the IT companies, are often perceived as having ERP expertise by companies unfamiliar with how the ERP industry operates. However, ERP requires specialized expertise that is distinct from general IT knowledge. System integrators typically operate similarly to ERP resellers, with partnerships with various providers and internal practices competing with each other.

Their Blind Spots. Despite potentially covering multiple ERP systems and process areas, their perspective may remain siloed. Sometimes companies rely upon IT consultants for IT procurement based on longstanding trust, with the hope of finding a system suitable for business processes. Generally, IT companies focus on technical aspects and may lack ERP expertise due to fewer engagement cycles and limited industry connections. 

Their Superpowers. Consequently, they are not considered independent ERP consultants. They are best suited for addressing specific IT issues such as infrastructure, desktop security, or internal server procurement. However, they may not be the most suitable choice for ERP selection and implementation.

3. ERP Resellers

Business Model. ERP resellers, often ISVs, may portray themselves as independent despite representing various ERP systems. They may offer proof of concept or collaborate with other resellers to present multiple options during the selection process.

Free Advice Potentially Biased. However, their primary goal is to sell the systems they carry, leading to inherent bias in the selection process. While they may carry multiple products that might not be listed on their sights, their content strategy and evaluation approach can reveal their independence.

Their Blind Spots. Businesses should exercise caution when engaging with ERP resellers, focusing on product-specific expertise rather than broader areas like change management or system architecture. Independent ERP consultants are better suited for tasks requiring unbiased evaluation and identification of technology solutions.

2. Change/Project Management Consulting Firms

Business Model. Change or project management consulting firms come in various flavors, each offering a unique approach to change management. While change management is a broad concept, ERP projects demand deep ERP expertise, even within change management consulting firms.

Their Blind Spots. Given the constant evolution of ERP licensing, products, and technology, daily involvement in ERP-related activities is crucial. However, similar to freelance consultants or marketing agencies, these firms may lack awareness of industry dynamics and political forces, relying on technical vendors for ERP expertise. This reliance can lead to issues during ERP implementation, as vendors often present biased perspectives. 

Their Affiliations. While change management consulting firms primarily focus on selling change management services, ERP change management differs significantly. Their independence may also be questionable due to potential affiliations with vendors. Evaluating their content strategy can shed light on their impartiality. Collaborating with these firms is advisable when seeking change management for simpler processes but may not be ideal for complex ERP transformations.

1. Accounting Fractional CFO Firms

Business Model. Accounting fractional CFO firms are often seen as the go-to for ERP systems due to their specialization in accounting and finance. However, similar to marketing agencies, lean consultants, or supply chain consulting firms, they may have a narrow focus, catering to specific areas. 

Their Blind Spots. ERP systems aim to integrate all departments, requiring expertise across various domains. While accounting fractional CFO firms excel in financial reporting and analytics, they may overlook out-of-the-box ERP solutions, instead focusing on their services for revenue generation. Despite claiming independence, they may have affiliations with multiple vendors, aligning with their business model akin to resellers or system integrators.

Their Superpowers. Consequently, they may not be considered independent. Collaborating with them is advisable when seeking accounting-centric or finance-centric expertise. However, independent ERP consultants are better suited for ERP selection and implementation due to their broader expertise across departments.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ERP industry is filled with buzzwords like “independent,” but not all companies truly grasp the nuances of independent ERP consulting. This blog has shed light on top 10 companies that may not fit the bill of independent ERP consultants, highlighting their unique business models. From affiliate marketing companies to accounting fractional CFO firms, each entity brings its own perspective to the table, but they may not necessarily offer the impartiality needed for ERP selection and implementation.

While these companies may excel in specific areas like marketing, supply chain, or accounting, their focus tends to be siloed, overlooking the comprehensive needs of ERP projects. Despite claims of independence, affiliations with vendors and biases in product promotion may undermine their credibility as independent consultants.

Therefore, businesses embarking on ERP projects should tread carefully when engaging with these entities, recognizing their strengths and limitations. While they may offer valuable expertise in their respective domains, independent ERP consultants remain the optimal choice for navigating the complexities of ERP selection and implementation. With their vendor-agnostic approach and comprehensive industry knowledge, independent consultants ensure unbiased evaluation and implementation of ERP systems, ultimately leading to successful ERP projects.

FAQs

Top 10 ERP Governance Processes for Implementation Integrity

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / May 27, 2024

ERP is a powerful technology, but it’s generally not one system for all your problems. Even if you have a state-of-the-art ERP selection and ERP implementation, you might still run into issues unless you have the ERP governance processes. So, what are the top 10 ERP governance processes that maintain ERP implementation integrity?

Commonly, companies approach ERP implementation and ERP selection with the belief that hiring consultants will suffice to navigate the complexities of the new system. They anticipate a smooth implementation process with a minimal strategy selection phase and post-implementation involvement. They might also think that once the implementation is done, they might not need guidance from the consultants. 

Top 10 ERP Governance Processes for Implementation Integrity

However, this approach might pose challenges, especially in managing internal operations without well-defined ERP governance processes or a center of excellence overseeing master data governance. Without proper ERP governance processes, even the most advanced implementation might run the risk of derailment due to data inconsistencies.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

10. Replenishment Strategies

Make-to-order vs Make-to-stock. Traditional replenishment strategies, such as make-to-order vs make-to-stock, could have a substantial impact on your ERP selection and implementation. Just because you have structured your processes as make-to-order and are able to run your business fine with this strategy doesn’t mean that it would be an optimal strategy for your future implementation. These configurations could also vary per product category. Companies, with poorly implemented ERP systems, struggle to differentiate between such strategies, leading to misconfigurations based on a limited understanding of the system.

Implications of Mix-up. The distinction between strategies such as make-to-order and make-to-stock isn’t always clear-cut, often resulting in grey areas. Mixing these approaches can cause issues with lead times, process tracking, and lead time calculations by the system, necessitating numerous modifications and extra steps to achieve accurate planning before releasing production orders.

Process Governance Meaningful Even Post Implementation. Effective ERP governance processes for replenishment strategies are essential, even post-implementation. Clear guidelines must be established for setting up product data, replenishment algorithms, and SKU correlation with the warehouse. Without proper governance, a multitude of issues may arise, impacting operational efficiency and overall performance.

9. Warehouse vs Warehouse Locations

The Blurred Lines of Physical and Digital Operations. This requires a deeper understanding of the ERP data model. While some companies grasp it, others may not, leading to a mix-up in interpretation among users. This confusion often extends to distinguishing between a warehouse and a warehouse location.  

Implications of this Mix-up. Such ambiguity can cause significant planning challenges. Therefore, clear ERP governance processes defining what constitutes a warehouse and how it is defined are essential. Additionally, confusion might also arise when labeling something as a warehouse without it being a physical facility. Given these complexities, sound judgment is necessary. Without clear guidelines on warehouse definition and identification, even a state-of-the-art ERP implementation may encounter issues post-implementation.

8. Item Attributes

They are like Sugar, Requiring Judgment. Item attributes often cause issues, especially when there are unclear guidelines regarding what constitutes an attribute and how to incorporate details into the item model. Within ERP systems, distinguishing between attributes and non-attributes is often a delicate matter, with implications for planning, costing, and integration with other systems. 

Implications of this Mix-up. Therefore, ERP governance processes for item attributes are crucial, defining what qualifies as an attribute and when to consider it, particularly during product launches. While determining whether something is an attribute can be challenging, clear guidelines are essential to avoid potential problems. Without such guidelines, issues are likely to arise.

7. Rework

Shortcuts aren’t as Clever with Rework. Rework is a significant process within production, and its handling should ideally be straightforward. However, companies often encounter challenges when incorporating rework into their BOMs. When rework is inconsistently labeled as a routing step or explicitly identified as rework across different processes, it can lead to numerous issues throughout production and procurement.

Implications of this Mix-up. To mitigate these challenges, ERP governance processes surrounding rework are crucial. Defining rework clearly and consistently is paramount. Establishing documented workflows, ensuring compliance, and implementing approval processes specific to rework can significantly enhance the integrity of ERP implementations.

6. Revision Number

The Subtle Art of Mastering Revision Numbers. The management of revision numbers within your data model can vary significantly. Sometimes revisions are recorded separately, while other times multiple names may be included within a single revision number. Additionally, the handling of revision numbers may depend on the user’s level of expertise with the products being used. This underscores the importance of training, compliance, and governance. It’s essential to monitor how teams handle this aspect, especially for new hires, for at least six months. 

Implications of this Mix-up. Clear guidelines regarding when to use revision numbers are crucial. Implementing control workflows and restricting access to individuals who are more knowledgeable about the ERP system can prevent many headaches. However, mishandling revision numbers often leads to integrity issues during ERP implementation. Therefore, ERP governance processes surrounding revision numbers are paramount to ensure the system functions effectively and accurately reflects the organization’s data.

5. BOMs

The Bill of “Migraines.” BOMs drive numerous governance issues, particularly in defining work orders versus routing steps, or distinguishing between engineering BOMs and production BOMs. These issues can significantly impact the integrity of ERP implementation. Maintaining this integrity is crucial, regardless of whether it’s been six months or a year since implementation.

Implications of this Mix-up. Control over these aspects must always be upheld once BOMs are integrated into the recall process. Once they’re transferred to customers, who may utilize serial numbers, altering the BOM’s state becomes challenging. Hence, clear guidelines on ERP governance processes surrounding BOM design and workflows are extremely critical for maintaining ERP implementation integrity.

4. Unit of Measures

The Unpleasant Toll of Misconfigured UoMs. Unit of measures significantly influences various aspects. Sometimes, companies might not prioritize units of measures adequately. They might organize them as separate SKUs or incorporate them as drop-down options on forms, as that aligns with technical understanding of requirements. However, unit of measure necessitates modeling data according to its structure and how units are procured, consumed, and sold.

Implications of this Mix-up. Proper modeling is crucial; failure to do so or to maintain ERP implementation integrity can lead to adverse effects. Mixing these schemes will likely result in planning and scheduling issues wherever these units of measures are utilized. Thus, ERP governance processes surrounding unit of measures are important for maintaining ERP implementation integrity.

3. SKU Number

Intelligent SKUs aren’t as intelligent. Clear guidelines regarding SKU numbers are essential. Opting for autogenerated SKU numbers is typically the best approach as it simplifies maintenance. Autogenerated SKUs eliminate debates about what can or cannot be included in the SKU number. Legacy systems may not support automated SKU generation, or if they do, the utility might not be seamlessly integrated with SKU numbers. 

Implications of this Mix-up. This disconnect can lead to issues, especially if an external add-on or utility is used for generation but cannot enforce SKU numbers on the product master itself. Additionally, modeling SKU numbers to accommodate variance in configurable inventory can pose challenges. Thus, ERP governance processes over SKU numbers are crucial for post-ERP implementation integrity.

2. Vendor Master Relationship

New Hand, New Version of the Same Vendor. You’ll encounter numerous challenges regarding vendor master relationships, as they are frequently updated. Unlike unit of measures or item attributes, which may not undergo frequent changes, the vendor master data is subject to frequent updates, especially considering the number of vendors involved in the process. Many individuals are responsible for maintaining vendors and may argue that centralized control slows down their operations. However, granting them control can lead to inconsistencies and break the implementation’s integrity.

Implications of this Mix-up. Common issues arise regarding how shipping tools and vendors are captured, sometimes resulting in confusion between ship-to addresses and vendor details. Additionally, decisions regarding whether vendors also serve as customers or employees impact ERP planning. Therefore, implementing ERP governance processes for vendor setup is essential to ensure smooth operations.

1. Customer Master Relationship 

Customer Master is as Crucial as Your Customers. Similar to vendor master data, customer master data encounters comparable challenges, with complexity varying depending on the organization’s specific circumstances. Some companies may have millions of customers but fewer vendors, while others may have the opposite scenario. Regardless, complexity of both customer and vendor master data influences operations. Issues arise when incorporating buying groups into the customer master model, especially if assumptions are made without aligning with the ERP data model, leading to planning complications.

Implications of this Mix-up. Sometimes, issues may not manifest immediately, potentially going unnoticed during testing. Overlooking consultant advice on setup complexity can exacerbate issues later on. Despite consultants recommending a certain setup, some organizations may perceive it as overly complicated and opt for a simpler approach, only to encounter issues afterward. Therefore, careful consideration and alignment with ERP data models are essential to avoid complications down the line.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, while ERP technology offers immense potential for streamlining operations, its successful implementation requires more than just cutting-edge software and consultants’ expertise. The governance processes surrounding ERP systems, including master data management and operational protocols, are paramount for maintaining implementation integrity. The top 10 ERP governance processes highlighted in this blog underscore the importance of clear guidelines, consistency, and alignment with organizational needs and ERP data models.

Whether it’s managing vendor and customer master relationships, defining SKU numbers, or ensuring accuracy in unit of measures and BOMs, robust ERP governance processes are essential for mitigating risks and ensuring smooth operations post-implementation. Without these governance mechanisms in place, even the most advanced ERP systems are susceptible to data inconsistencies, planning challenges, and operational disruptions. Therefore, organizations must prioritize establishing and adhering to ERP governance processes to maximize the benefits of their ERP investments and drive long-term success. While this blog provides helpful insights, consulting an independent ERP consultant can significantly improve your implementation outcomes.

FAQs

SAP S/4 HANA ERP Independent Review 2024

SAP S/4 HANA ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / May 27, 2024

SAP S/4 HANA is SAP’s flagship product and one of the few viable options for large enterprises, especially those with the transactional demands of Fortune 500. Compared to its counterpart, ECC, SAP S/4 HANA features a modern architecture that merges best-of-breed capabilities with enterprise-grade SaaS offerings, while maintaining tightly integrated ERP processes at its core. This suite includes leading solutions like SAP SuccessFactors for HCM, SAP Hybris for commerce, SAP EWM for WMS, Ariba for P2P, and also Concur for T&E management. Unlike other market solutions that treat these processes as ERP modules, SAP S/4 HANA ensures seamless adoption and delivers a superior omnichannel experience, particularly important for HR processes across various devices.

SAP S/4 HANA is also favored by enterprise-grade companies for its ability to handle large transaction volumes and meet stringent governance and traceability requirements. It is particularly well-suited for product-centric enterprises needing mature capabilities such as MRP and allocation. Additionally, for enterprises needing advanced eCommerce platforms with components like CDP or CPQ systems, SAP S/4 HANA offers essential functionalities. It is also highly effective for multinational companies needing unified databases for easier reconciliation.

However, SAP S/4 HANA may not be ideal for companies transitioning from smaller ERP systems or QuickBooks, as it requires a certain level of IT maturity for successful implementation. Although it has deep ERP capabilities, the suite experience might fall short compared to prescriptive platforms like Infor LN or QAD. Moreover, reliance on third-party add-ons for integrations can lead to vendor conflicts, increased budgets, and higher implementation risks. Despite its cloud advancements, SAP still trails behind some competitors. Nonetheless, the following sections will delve into the key features, advantages, and drawbacks of SAP S/4 HANA.

SAP S/4 HANA ERP Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Key Review Insights of SAP S/4 HANA

1. Pre-integrated Best-of-breed Capabilities

The best-of-breed software, such as SAP Commerce Cloud, Hybris, Concur, SuccessFactors, and EWM, is pre-integrated with SAP S/4 HANA, potentially saving millions of dollars with integration. The best-of-breed architecture can also support the business model of large distributors, irrespective of whether they are a traditional distributor or a combination of 3PL, which typically has a different warehouse and TMS architecture than traditional distributors.

2. Financial Traceability for Large Global Companies

 It is one of the most intuitive ERP products for particularly such complex operations with its transactional maps capabilities built with the products, making debugging complex financial enterprises easier. SAP S/4 HANA is also capable of building end-to-end traceability of SOX compliance workflows with every document and transaction, which is often required by large complex financial organizations.

3. The Power of HANA

Because of the power of HANA, SAP S/4 HANA can process very complex MRP runs with product models containing millions of serial numbers and SKUs and the ability to process millions of costing and scheduling entries much faster than most ERP systems.

4. Superior Financial Control and Governance

Some of the capabilities include several financial hierarchies particularly to support complex, global organizations without requiring ad-hoc arrangements for global traceability or consolidations. Fortune 500 organizations with shared service models spread in multiple countries would appreciate the financial traceability that is built at the document level.

5. Limited Cloud Version Capabilities

The cloud version is behind with development particularly in comparison to the on-prem variant. Equally limited are the marketplace options compared to other competing solutions. Despite advanced financial traceability and technical capabilities, the functional capabilities are not as rich as with its on-prem version.

6. Overwhelming for Smaller Companies

The complex workflows built to support the processes of large, complex organizations may particularly overwhelm organizations seeking simpler solutions without unnecessary processes and approval flows.

7. Adoption Issues for Service-centric Verticals

Unlike product-centric organizations, service-centric verticals don’t have as financially embedded transactions, causing efficiency issues with teams if their workflows were to be managed inside complex ERP systems such as SAP S/4 HANA.

8. Ability to Handle Large Workloads

Our simple test of HANA’s capabilities with 100K serialized goods receipt found it to be faster than most systems out there. SAP S/4 HANA could process it in under 22 seconds, while Oracle cloud ERP took more than 18 mins for the same test. This is especially friendly for businesses with complex products aiming to run their consolidated global MRP runs in one system.

Key Features of SAP S/4 HANA

Financial Management

In this section, we explore and analyze the financial management module of SAP S/4 HANA, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Financial ManagementFeatures
Overhead Cost AccountingRecords journal entries, tracks costs by cost center, and also defines each center’s output through activity types.
Product Cost ManagementAnalyzes costs at each stage of the value chain using an integrated system, and also aligns quantity flow from logistics with financial values.
Profitability and Cost AnalysisHelps assess the profitability of the market segments and cost objects and also provides real-time contribution margins.
Predictive AccountingUtilizes data from sales orders to forecast future outcomes before actual journal entries are made.
Investment ManagementFacilitates planning, budgeting, commitment tracking, and also monitoring actual costs.
General LedgerPerforms the necessary tasks of financial accounting.
Asset AccountingManages and monitors tangible fixed assets.
Revenue and Cost AccountingIdentifies revenues and also calculates contract liabilities and contract assets.
Inventory AccountingHelps assess and oversee the material and work-in-process inventory according to legal regulations.
Accounts PayableSubmits the invoices created in purchasing.
Accounts ReceivableRecords and manages accounts receivable data of all customers.
Settlement ManagementEncompasses several settlement processes, particularly including those integrated into the order-to-cash cycle or procure-to-pay scenarios.
Human Resources

In this section, we explore and analyze the human resources module of SAP S/4 HANA, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Human ResourcesFeatures
Organizational Structure ManagementHelps create, maintain, and also restructure organizational structures.
Time Sheet ManagementHelps record and manage time data of all employees.
Integration with External HR SystemSupports integration with SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central to duplicate employee and organizational data.
Manufacturing Management

In this section, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management module of SAP S/4 HANA, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Manufacturing ManagementFeatures
Just-in-Time Supply to ProductionEnables material replenishment for manufacturing and assembly from either an internal location or an external supplier.
Just-in-Time Supply to CustomerCovers JIT processes from the perspective of the supplier.
Production BOM ManagementManages bills of material, assigns them to the plants, monitors multilevel BOM assignments, and can also find BOM for a component.
Master Recipe/Routing ManagementEnables modeling of the capabilities of the manufacturing equipment and also monitors their performance.
Material Requirements PlanningHelps ensure the availability of materials and perform basic production planning.
Production Scheduling Helps change the production plan particularly according to the capacity shortage, and demands in time and quantity.
Demand-driven ReplenishmentHelps plan and also manage supply chain based on customer demand.
Production Control and ExecutionHelps dispatch production operations and also make all necessary preparations for production execution.
Repetitive ManufacturingHelps plan and organize production particularly in repetitive manufacturing and flow manufacturing environments.
KanbanHelps manage production and also material flow based on physical material stock in
production.
Quality Planning, Inspection, and ImprovementHelps ensure the quality of the products and processes, also prepares and executes quality inspections, and provides tools to improve them.
Maintenance, Repair, and OverhaulSupports processes for particularly maintenance and repair during the product lifecycle.
Pegging and Distribution for Project ManufacturingHelps enhance project manufacturing efficiency in an engineer-to-order setting particularly by utilizing shared common materials across various projects.
Sourcing and Procurement

In this section, we explore and analyze the sourcing and procurement module of SAP S/4 HANA, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Sourcing and ProcurementFeatures
Real-time Reporting and MonitoringProvides a set of actionable cards: both operational and also analytical which can be navigated to find detailed information and resolve.
Spend VisibilityVisualizes the daily work in different charts and by criteria.
Purchase Contract ManagementHelps manage the long-term purchase contracts with suppliers particularly regarding the supply of materials or performance of services.
Self-service RequisitioningHelps create, manage, and also track the orders.
Requirement ProcessingAssists in acquiring a specific quantity of a material or service particularly to ensure availability at a designated time.
Purchase Order ProcessingAssists in instructing an external supplier to deliver a specific quantity of a material or service particularly to ensure availability at a designated time.
Service Purchasing and RecordingManage and record the purchase orders of external service providers.
Invoice ManagementHelps with processing purchase orders and goods receipt, along with integration with business networks to collaborate with suppliers.
Supplier ManagementHelps with supplier classification, segmentation, and evaluation.
Supply Chain Management

In this section, we explore and analyze the supply chain management module of SAP S/4 HANA, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Supply Chain ManagementFeatures
Goods MovementHelps in managing goods issues, goods receipt, and reservations.
Inventory Analytics and Control Helps in evaluating and displaying stock information along with checking analytics reports.
Physical Inventory Helps in recording the actual stock levels of materials.
Returnable Packaging LogisticsHelps with the exchange of reusable packaging materials with business partners.
Empties ManagementHelps in mapping the administration and deposit requirements of returnable packages.
Delivery ManagementHelps in managing the inbound and outbound deliveries.
Transportation ManagementHelps in supporting the entire transportation chain.
Warehouse ManagementHelps maintain optimized warehouse operations by supporting and managing real-time transparency into material movements.
Stock Room ManagementProvides capabilities for warehouses with low complexity.
Available to PromiseHelps in configuring, executing, and monitoring the availability checks.
Business Process Scheduling Helps plan dates for different logistics activities involved in various business processes.

Pros and Cons of SAP S/4 HANA

ProsCons
Large complex financial organizations require end-to-end traceability of SOX compliance workflows, also built with each document and transaction with SAP S/4 HANA.The data model is designed for large, complex organizations, and also overwhelming for smaller organizations outgrowing QuickBooks or smaller ERP systems.
The best-of-breed software, such as SAP Commerce Cloud, Hybris, Concur, SuccessFactors, and EWM, is pre-integrated with the SAP S/4 HANA, potentially saving millions of dollars with integration.The pre-baked last-mile capabilities specific to micro-industries might be limited, requiring either development or add-ons on top of the core solution.
Enterprise Product Designed for Product-centric Companies. The item master, product model, and warehouse architecture can accommodate the needs of most manufacturing business models.Despite advanced technical capabilities such as AI, the last mile industry capabilities and operational functionality are limited in their cloud ERP version.
SAP S/4 HANA could process more than 100K serialized goods receipts within 22 secs, while Oracle Cloud ERP took more than 18 mins for the same test.The third-party integration options, such as integration with eCommerce platforms, POS systems, channel connectivity, etc, may require substantial development efforts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SAP remains a dominant force in the ERP market, particularly favored by enterprise-grade companies due to its robust SAP S/4 HANA offering. This solution integrates leading products like SAP SuccessFactors, SAP Hybris, SAP EWM, Ariba, and Concur, particularly catering to diverse enterprise needs. With strengths in handling large transaction volumes, governance, and traceability requirements, SAP S/4 HANA excels in product-centric enterprises, offering mature capabilities such as MRP and allocation.

However, it may pose challenges for smaller organizations lacking sufficient IT maturity, and SAP’s SMB presence faces uncertainties. Despite notable progress in cloud offerings, SAP trails competitors in this arena. Nevertheless, the key review insights highlight the pre-integrated best-of-breed capabilities, financial traceability, and scalability for large workloads offered by SAP S/4 HANA. While SAP S/4 HANA presents compelling advantages for enterprise-grade companies with complex operational needs, smaller organizations and those prioritizing cloud solutions may find it less suitable. Understanding these pros and cons is crucial for businesses considering SAP S/4 HANA as their ERP solution. Also, companies may benefit from consulting an independent ERP consultant who can provide valuable insights and assessments to determine if SAP S/4 HANA aligns seamlessly with their organizational requirements.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

Oracle Cloud ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / May 27, 2024

What is Oracle Cloud ERP? Oracle Cloud ERP remains a top choice particularly for large companies across diverse industries, including media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare (post-acquisition of Cerner). It is particularly suitable for organizations with substantial internal IT expertise and a requirement for integrating various proprietary and third-party software systems, such as patient claims management or utility billing solutions.

Oracle Cloud ERP is well-suited for global companies using it as their corporate financial ledger while employing other systems at the subsidiary level. Its robust financial capabilities cater to companies needing ledger-level security and hierarchical financial reporting, such as LOB, functions, or funds. Additionally, it seamlessly integrates a powerful HCM solution along with a natively integrated EPM solution.

Oracle Cloud ERP excels in risk management, advertising, and Cx cloud, particularly catering to industries like financial services and insurance. While it is a superior fit for service-centric industries, its success in product-centric industries has been limited. Often used as a corporate ledger, it might deploy another operationally rich solution at the subsidiary level in certain industries. Despite its strength for large enterprises, Oracle Cloud ERP is not the ideal choice for SMB customers.

Oracle Cloud ERP Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Key Review Insights of Oracle Cloud ERP

1. Embedded WMS and TMS Processes

The embedded WMS and TMS processes within the ERP solution offer tailored functionalities that are especially beneficial for logistics and healthcare-focused organizations. These industries often deal with intricate supply chain operations, requiring meticulous inventory management and also efficient transportation logistics. Moreover, for services-centric organizations with leaner inventory management needs, the embedded WMS and TMS provide scalable solutions that align with their operational requirements.

2. Designed for Large Financial Organizations

The product architecture is tailored to particularly accommodate the intricate requirements of expansive financial enterprises. It facilitates the management of extensive sub-ledger hierarchies, also ensuring meticulous organization and tracking of financial data across various levels of the organization. This hierarchical structure also allows for granular control and visibility into financial operations. It has the ability to conduct subsidiary-level book closures, providing the flexibility to manage financial processes at a more localized level while maintaining overall financial integrity. Furthermore, it also offers support for user-defined books, catering to the diverse accounting needs of branch, fund, partnership accounting, etc.

3. Designed for Large Service-centric Organizations

The embedded HCM, CRM, and CPQ processes cater particularly well to large service-centric organizations. These organizations typically operate with leaner inventory and operational needs, focusing more on delivering services rather than managing extensive inventories or complex manufacturing processes. Furthermore, the P2P workflows are tailored to meet the needs of indirect procurement organizations.

4. Limited Capabilities for Product-centric Qrganizations

While it provides robust functionality for many aspects of business operations, including finance, procurement, and supply chain management, some organizations, particularly those with a strong focus on product-centric operations, may find certain areas of the platform less accommodating to their specific needs. The product-centric organizations requiring more advanced capabilities such as integrated MES or PLM, the standard P2P functionality may lack the depth or customization options necessary to fully support complex manufacturing and product development workflows. Furthermore, product-centric organizations with intricate manufacturing processes may encounter limitations in configuring highly customized products. They might also face limitations while managing engineering changes seamlessly between the CPQ system and manufacturing operations.

5. Not Fit for Fortune 1000 MRP Workloads

It is great as a financial ledger. However, when it comes to managing complex products with serialized structures or overseeing intricate BOMs within large enterprises, certain challenges may arise. Large enterprises dealing with such complexities may also find that Oracle Cloud ERP requires significant processing time and resources to handle these tasks efficiently. As a result, there might be potential delays or performance issues, impacting the overall operational efficiency. Moreover, in environments where there are operational and financial synergies among different entities or business units, Oracle Cloud ERP’s adaptability and integration capabilities may face testing.

6. Top Choice for Construction Enterprises

In contrast to SAP S/4 HANA and Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O, Oracle ERP Cloud stands out as a top choice for construction enterprises. Thus, providing tailored operational features. Its construction-focused portfolio includes Oracle Aconex for design and coordination, Primavera for project management, and also Textura for subcontractor invoicing. It also includes tools for pre-construction collaboration, fostering seamless cooperation between contractors and subcontractors.

7. Fit for Consolidating Global Entities

Oracle Cloud ERP is an excellent choice particularly for enterprises seeking to consolidate global entities seamlessly within a single database. Thus, minimizing the need for numerous subsidiary-level ERP systems in a two-tier setting.

8. Overwhelming for Smaller Organizations

For companies transitioning from QuickBooks or particularly smaller ERP systems, the extensive data model and translation demands of Oracle Cloud ERP may pose challenges. The complexity of managing and translating data could overwhelm these companies, particularly hindering their successful adoption of the product.

Key Features of Oracle Cloud ERP

Financial Management

In this section, we explore and analyze the financial management module of Oracle Cloud ERP, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Financial ManagementFeatures
Accounting and ControlHelps streamline financial operations through automated processes, standardized controls, and enhanced joint venture management, while ensuring compliance and efficiency across global operations.
Accounting HubHelps establish a unified and adaptable accounting platform for enterprise-wide financial processes, ensuring harmonized data, trusted information, and powerful processing capabilities.
Payables and ExpensesHelps optimize cash management and streamline payables through dynamic discounts, touchless invoicing, shared services, and accelerated expense management.
Receivables and CashHelps enhance cash management and customer satisfaction through streamlined invoicing, personalized services, automated cash forecasting, and compliance with revenue recognition standards.
Asset and Lease ManagementHelps streamline asset management with automated lifecycle processes, diverse tax depreciation strategies, and compliance with ASC 842 and IFRS 16 standards.
U.S. Federal FinancialsHelps enhance US federal accounting efficiency, accuracy, and compliance while reducing operational costs through automation and improved financial reporting capabilities.
Environmental Impact TrackingHelps monitor and report supply chain emissions and environmental impacts efficiently by capturing and tracking supplier, item, and invoice data in Cloud ERP.
Project Management

In this section, we explore and analyze the project management module of Oracle Cloud ERP, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Project ManagementFeatures
Plan, Schedule, and ForecastHelps to efficiently plan, schedule, collaborate, and analyze projects with streamlined resource allocation and predictive insights for proactive decision-making.
Resource ManagementHelps manage resources by matching skills to projects, balancing capacity with demand, monitoring workload, and also aligning talent with project needs to maximize productivity and retention.
Cost Management and ControlHelps ensure standardized cost capture, comprehensive cost control, and real-time visibility into project costs and commitments with Oracle Cloud’s integrated cost management solutions, augmented by Oracle Digital Assistant for personalized project costing insights.
Billing and Revenue ManagementHelps optimize cash flow and ensure contract compliance with streamlined customer invoicing, project billing controls, and flexible revenue recognition processes.
Project Asset ManagementHelps manage capital projects, streamline processes, and also gain real-time insights into project performance for informed decision-making.
Grant ManagementHelps manage grant funds throughout the post-award lifecycle. Thus, ensuring spending control, maximizing reimbursements, and automating sponsorship invoices for diverse formats.
Program Management and Reporting Helps optimize business benefits by efficiently tracking and coordinating related projects within programs. Thus, enabling informed decision-making and seamless communication with stakeholders.
Procurement

In this section, we explore and analyze the procurement module of Oracle Cloud ERP, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

ProcurementFeatures
Supplier ManagementHelps ​​enhance supplier collaboration, performance, and risk management through a comprehensive platform offering self-service portals, performance measurement, and proactive risk mitigation strategies.
SourcingHelps enhance cost efficiency and value by leveraging analytics-driven sourcing strategies to optimize productivity, streamline negotiations, and maximize savings.
Procurement ContractsHelps enhance contract efficiency and compliance while minimizing legal involvement, mitigating supplier risks, and improving visibility into contract portfolios.
PurchasingHelps enhance procurement efficiency with a user-friendly shopping experience, streamlined purchasing processes, and also automated payment management to ensure compliance and cost savings.
Direct ProcurementHelps optimize supply chain resilience and project-driven operations while ensuring customer satisfaction through efficient order processing and automated replenishment purchases for uninterrupted production.
Procurement AnalysisHelps enhance procurement efficiency through AI-driven spend classification, insightful spend analysis, dynamic category intelligence, and also proactive supplier performance management.
Risk Management and Compliance

In this section, we explore and analyze the risk management and compliance module of Oracle Cloud ERP, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Risk Management and ComplianceFeatures
Monitoring and Control of User Access AutomationHelps ensure compliance and security by designing custom roles, detecting SoD violations in access requests, monitoring sensitive access, generating SoD reports, and automating user access reviews.
AI Monitoring of User ActivityHelps automate monitoring of critical configurations and financial transactions to identify unauthorized changes, fraud, and ensure process integrity across procure-to-pay, record-to-report, order-to-cash, and hire-to-retire processes.
Managing Internal ControlsHelps manage internal controls and streamline risk assessment through automated monitoring and unified collaboration platforms.
Enterprise Performance Management (EPM)

In this section, we explore and analyze the EPM module of Oracle Cloud ERP, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Enterprise Performance Management (EPM)Features
EPM PlatformThe platform serves as a framework for both technical and functional components across Cloud EPM processes, offering a unified user experience and simplified administration across diverse business functions.
PlanningHelps create agile, interconnected plans, spanning scenario modeling, long-range planning, budgeting, and line-of-business planning, all based on industry best practices.
Profitability and Cost ManagementHelps gain insights into your highest revenue-generating products or business segments. Also, develops transparent allocation models for analyzing profitability, shared service costing, IT financial management, and tax transfer pricing.
Financial Consolidation and CloseHelps respond business needs and compliance standards through built-in functionalities spanning the entire close process.
Account ReconciliationHelps ​​automate reconciliations and transaction matching to enhance financial statement accuracy while mitigating security and risk concerns.
Tax ReportingHelps align corporate financial reporting and taxation for improved visibility and compliance, providing transparent tax processes, including tax provision and country-by-country reporting (CbCR).
Narrative ReportingHelps collaboratively author and publish financial, management, and regulatory report packages.
FreeformIt combines the versatility of Essbase with the scalability and governance of SaaS.
Enterprise Data ManagementHelps oversee business transformation through enterprise data management, encompassing governance, visualization of change data, and also hierarchy administration.
ERP Analytics

In this section, we explore and analyze the ERP analytics module of Oracle Cloud ERP, shedding light particularly on their features and capabilities.

Business AnalyticsFeatures
General LedgerHelps gain insights into profitability drivers, optimize cash flow, and easily analyze sub-ledger details with prebuilt KPIs and metrics.
ReceivablesHelps enhance revenue analysis and collection efficiency with prebuilt tools for in-depth revenue analysis, DSO improvement, and AR aging analysis.
PayablesHelps enhance payment efficiency by tracking vendor payments, improving days payable outstanding (DPO), and analyzing payment aging trends visually.
SpendHelps gain comprehensive insight into company spending, analyze across categories, and minimize non-compliant spend to optimize working capital alignment between finance and procurement.
ExpensesHelps detect fraud and ensure policy compliance Also, tracks expense processing time to maintain efficiency and integrity.
ProcurementHelps identify cost-saving opportunities, streamline procure-to-pay processes, and minimize supplier risk with prebuilt analytics.
ProjectHelps monitor budget variances, control project costs, gain insights on revenue trends, and also integrate project data across departments for better decision-making.
AssetsHelps gain insights into asset health, monitor capital and operating assets, and also optimize return on assets for improved financial forecasts.
Accounting HubHelps establish a system for accounting data insights, uncover operational and financial connections. Thus, also helps attain a cross-functional view of the business.

Pros and Cons of Oracle Cloud ERP

ProsCons
The product architecture supports the needs of large complex financial organizations with deep sub-ledger hierarchies.While functionally capable, transactional and financial traceability might not be as intuitive for large, complex enterprises.
Oracle Cloud ERP has an ecosystem of experienced consultants capable of handling the architecture of such complex enterprises.The data model and translations required to be successful with the product may be too overwhelming for particularly companies outgrowing QuickBooks or other smaller ERP systems.
The embedded HCM and CRM processes are suitable for large non-profit organizations. The P2P workflows are also friendlier for the indirect procurement needs of non-profit organizations.Might struggle with the complex MRP runs hitting millions and millions of costing, scheduling, and also WIP industries.
The workload Oracle Cloud ERP is designed to process millions of GL entries per hour.Longer time in customizing and configuring as the software design may consist of unnecessary allocation, commitment, and approval functionality for large companies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Oracle ERP Cloud stands as a versatile solution, particularly tailored for large enterprises across various industries, from media to healthcare. Its robust financial management capabilities make it a top choice for organizations particularly seeking comprehensive ledger-level security and hierarchical reporting. Moreover, its seamless integration of HCM and EPM functionalities further enhances its appeal, particularly for service-centric industries where lean inventory management and efficient project tracking are essential.

However, despite its strengths, Oracle ERP Cloud may present challenges for organizations transitioning from smaller ERP systems, particularly in managing complex data models and translations. Additionally, while it excels in certain areas like risk management and advertising, its fit for product-centric organizations remains limited. Nevertheless, with its tailored features for construction enterprises and its ability to consolidate global entities efficiently, Oracle ERP Cloud continues to be a compelling option for large-scale enterprises seeking to optimize their operations and financial management on a global scale. Also, companies may benefit from consulting an independent ERP consultant who can provide valuable insights and assessments to determine if Oracle Cloud ERP aligns seamlessly with their organizational requirements.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / May 14, 2024

What is Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O? Microsoft Dynamics F&O is the flagship product from Microsoft. It is one of the strongest particularly in cloud-native enterprise-grade operational capabilities. Compared to other enterprise-grade products such as SAP S/4 HANA or Oracle Cloud ERP, which might not be as rich in their out-of-the-box operational capabilities, Microsoft Dynamics F&O packages capabilities for upper mid-market and lower enterprise global and diverse organizations.

In contrast to smaller products such as Mircosoft Dynamics Business Central or NetSuite, which generally rely on add-ons for mature operational capabilities, Microsoft Dynamics would provide them out of the box. While the operational capabilities are richer, it might not have the same pre-baked and pre-integrated suite as with comparable prescribed systems such as Infor LN or QAD. However, the ecosystem stands out with the presence of large enterprise software companies such as ISVs, backed by substantial funding, filling the gap despite these capabilities not being out-of-the-box and provided directly by Microsoft.

Despite richer operational capabilities, MS Dynamics 365 F&O is not as proven with the Fortune 500 workloads, but it’s a solid option for upper mid-market or lower mid-market, especially for companies aiming to keep all of their processes in one system globally. The way the Microsoft channel is structured also has an impact on the distribution and support model of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O. Microsoft also does not provide direct support to its partners. While this would not be an issue with the larger partners whose support organizations are likely to be as big as Microsoft, smaller organizations might struggle. Despite pros and cons, Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O is one of the solid options for companies with diverse business models and sizes.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O ERP Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Key Review Insights of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O

1. Designed for Large, Diverse and Global Organizations

Businesses that have multiple global entities with complex business models such as discrete and process manufacturing, distribution, and project-based business models would find Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O attractive.

2. Cloud-Native Architecture

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O has been completely rearchitected particularly using the cloud-native architecture. Cloud capabilities are stronger than competing products for distributors such as SAP S/4 HANA and Oracle ERP Cloud.

3. Powerful Ecosystem

The consultants are present in most countries and solutions available to augment the core capabilities of most industries. Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O is considered to have a powerful ecosystem. This is especially beneficial for private equity and holding companies trying to streamline all of their entities on one solution. They can find add-ons if the core solution doesn’t meet their needs for last-mile industry capabilities.

4. Overwhelming for Smaller Organizations

Companies under $250M in revenue or outgrowing smaller ERP or accounting systems such as QuickBooks might struggle in using Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O. This is due to their limited data modeling and translation expertise.

5. Not Fit for Large Workloads

Dynamics 365 F&O might not be the most suitable for the transactional workload and the MRP run of the Fortune 500 due to the heavy lifting required. Compared to SAP S/4 HANA, it might not be able to match the performance expectations of large complex organizations. Because these companies may need to process millions of journal entries per hour.

6. Limited Governance Process

Since Microsoft sells licenses in the OEM setting with a limited governance process in place, buying these products from unqualified resellers fires back and may lead to ERP implementation failure.

7. Mixed-mode Manufacturing Capabilities

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O can accommodate several business models as part of the same solution, such as PSA, process, and discrete manufacturing. Its strength includes the core ERP capabilities such as native support for mixed-mode manufacturing, including deep process manufacturing such as formulation management, catch weight management, approvals, and commitments.

8. Integrated Best-of-breed Products

While Microsoft has best-of-breed ERP integration such as CRM or field service, it might be especially friendly for companies trying to decouple business processes to gain operational efficiencies or expedite the sales or field service cycles. Like industries such as food and beverage machinery or appliances. Although, they might not be as directly relevant for make-to-order companies but will be useful for make-to-order companies with diverse business models.

Key Features of Microsoft dynamics 365 F&O

Financial Management

Some of the financial management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O are as follows:

Financial ManagementFeatures
General LedgerCreates and maintains accurate records for financial transactions and generates regular financial reports.
Accounts Receivable and PayableAutomates workflows for managing vendor invoices, payments, and customer invoicing, streamlining the entire invoicing process and improving cash flow management.
Cash Flow ManagementProvides comprehensive cash flow forecasting capabilities, allowing to project future cash positions, identify potential shortfalls, and make informed decisions.
Chart of AccountsEnables the creation of a hierarchical structure for categorizing financial information.
Budgeting and ForecastingCreates and manages budgets across different departments and business units. Also, leverages historical data and predictive analytics, to make accurate projections and align their financial strategies with business goals.
Supply Chain Management

Some of the supply chain management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O are as follows:

Supply Chain ManagementFeatures
Warehouse ManagementProvides advanced warehouse and transportation management features, including inventory tracking, order fulfillment, shipment planning, and real-time visibility into logistics operations.
Service ManagementEstablishes service agreements and service subscriptions, handles service orders and customer inquiries, and manages and analyzes the delivery of services to customers.
Inventory ManagementOffers real-time visibility into inventory levels, demand, and supply, enabling organizations to optimize their inventory planning, reduce stockouts, and improve customer satisfaction.
Procurement and SourcingStreamlines the procurement process by providing end-to-end visibility and control over purchasing activities. Also automates and optimizes the procurement workflows, reducing costs and improving supplier relationships.
Transportation ManagementOffers real-time visibility into logistics operations.
Demand Planning and ForecastingGenerates accurate demand forecasts, helping organizations optimize production planning, inventory levels, and procurement decisions.
Manufacturing Management

Some of the manufacturing management ERP features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O are as follows:

Manufacturing ManagementFeatures
Production PlanningProvides comprehensive production planning and control capabilities, allowing organizations to optimize their manufacturing processes. The system supports various production scenarios, including make-to-order, make-to-stock, and engineer-to-order, while providing real-time visibility into production schedules, resource allocation, and material requirements.
Shop Floor ManagementOffers real-time monitoring of shop floor activities, capturing data on machine utilization, labor productivity, and production progress.
Product Lifecycle ManagementEnables organizations to manage the entire product lifecycle, from design and engineering to manufacturing and after-sales service. The system integrates product data, engineering change orders, and quality management processes, ensuring seamless collaboration and visibility across different departments.
Quality Control and ComplianceProvides robust quality control and compliance features, allowing organizations to define quality standards, perform inspections, track non-conformances, and ensure adherence to regulatory requirements.
Business Intelligence And Reporting

Some of the business intelligence and reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O are as follows:

Business Intelligence and ReportingFeatures
Real-time Analytics and DashboardEnables organizations to gain real-time insights into their operations with interactive dashboards and reports. Also, provides visual representations of key performance indicators, financial metrics, and operational data, empowering stakeholders to make data-driven decisions.
ReportingCreates custom reports and visualizations tailored to specific needs. This flexibility enables in-depth analysis, data exploration, and the generation of actionable insights to drive continuous improvement and strategic decision-making.

Pros and Cons of Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O

ProsCons
Ideal for large, global companies with complex business models operating in multiple countries.Companies under $250M in revenue or outgrowing smaller ERP might find it overwhelming due to the data modeling and translation expertise required.
Embedded WMS and TMS processes help companies requiring end-to-end traceability including external supply chain.While Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O has a vibrant marketplace to augment its core capabilities, crucial capabilities such as PLM, etc, might not be owned and pre-integrated by Microsoft.
Supports global operations and business models and pre-baked integration for the best-of-breed CRM and field service solutions.The last-mile capabilities required in specific micro-verticals such as dairy, plastic, building supplies, or metal might require add-ons or expensive development on top of the core platform.
It has richer operational functionality for the cloud than SAP S/4 HANA and Oracle ERP Cloud.While MS Dynamics may have been used as a financial ledger for the workload of Fortune 1000, it is not as proven for the global MRP workload in one solution.
The largest marketplace with solutions to augment most A&D business models not supported by the core product.Microsoft channel is very complex, without any direct support for its resellers and partners, making navigating the Microsoft channel extremely hard.
The technical architecture includes integration with other Microsoft products, such as Logic Apps and Azure Data Factory, allowing them to isolate their infrastructure for validation requirements.Complex global organizations may struggle with financial traceability and SOX compliance capabilities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations (F&O) emerges as a formidable contender, particularly for upper mid-market businesses seeking comprehensive financial management solutions. Its cloud-native architecture, coupled with its ability to handle diverse business models within a single platform, sets it apart from its competitors. However, navigating the ecosystem, characterized by a mix of ISVs and VARs, may require guidance from independent ERP consulting firms. This is to ensure successful implementations and mitigate risks associated with unqualified resellers.

While Dynamics 365 F&O offers robust features and integration capabilities, it may not be the optimal choice for smaller organizations or those with exceptionally large transactional workloads. Despite these limitations, its strengths lie in its powerful ecosystem, extensive consulting base, and the availability of add-ons to augment core functionalities. In essence, Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O presents a compelling solution for large organizations with complex operational requirements, offering advanced financial management, supply chain optimization, and business intelligence capabilities. This Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O independent review intends to provide you with unbiased insights for further discussion with your independent ERP consultants.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

Oracle Cloud ERP vs MS Dynamics 365 BC Independent Review 2024

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By / May 14, 2024

Oracle ERP Cloud remains a top choice for large companies across diverse industries, particularly media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare. Despite the need for internal IT expertise, it is also suitable for companies with a need to integrate various third-party software systems. On the other hand, Microsoft Dynamics 365 BC serves as a logical choice for companies outgrowing smaller ERP, MRP, and accounting systems like QuickBooks, Microsoft GP, Odoo, Katana, or Fulcrum.

Oracle Cloud ERP particularly caters to companies needing ledger-level security and hierarchical financial reporting. On the other hand, Microsoft Dynamics 365 BC is ideal for companies with diversified, global operations aspiring to keep all of their entities in one database for easier reconciliation and tracking. Although, the sweet spot for MS BC would be $30M-$250 in revenue and a higher revenue band for companies that might use MS BC just for accounting and financial reporting while using mature operational systems at the subsidiary level.

Thus, choosing between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC requires a detailed examination, and this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC Independent Review 2024


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now
Oracle Cloud ERPMS Dynamics 365 Business Central
Started in20122018 (Previously NAV)
Ownership byOracleMicrosoft
No. of customers 10,000+60,000+

What is Oracle Cloud ERP?

Oracle ERP Cloud remains a top choice particularly for large companies across diverse industries, including media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare (post-acquisition of Cerner). It is particularly suitable for organizations with substantial internal IT expertise and a requirement for integrating various proprietary and third-party software systems, such as patient claims management or utility billing solutions.

Oracle ERP Cloud is well-suited for global companies using it as their corporate financial ledger while employing other systems at the subsidiary level. Its robust financial capabilities cater to companies needing ledger-level security and hierarchical financial reporting, such as LOB, functions, or funds. Additionally, it seamlessly integrates a powerful HCM solution along with a natively integrated EPM solution.

Oracle ERP Cloud excels in risk management, advertising, and Cx cloud, particularly catering to industries like financial services and insurance. While it is a superior fit for service-centric industries, its success in product-centric industries has been limited. Often used as a corporate ledger, it might deploy another operationally rich solution at the subsidiary level in certain industries. Despite its strength for large enterprises, Oracle ERP Cloud is not the ideal choice for SMB customers.

What Is MS Dynamics 365 BC?

Rearchitected with cloud-native technologies, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is the SMB solution from Microsoft, globalized and also localized in most countries with a consulting base available virtually in any country or language. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central serves as a logical choice particularly for companies outgrowing smaller ERP, MRP, and accounting systems like QuickBooks, Microsoft GP, Odoo, Katana, or Fulcrum. It is positioned against competitors such as Netsuite, Sage Intacct, and Acumatica. It also offers a vibrant ecosystem with numerous add-ons catering to industry-specific needs.

The sweet spot for MS BC would be $30M-$250 in revenue and a higher revenue band for companies that might use MS BC just for accounting and financial reporting while using mature operational systems at the subsidiary level. The biggest advantage of MS BC is its consulting ecosystem and community support, which is much bigger than most ERP ecosystems, and that’s why it’s probably one of the most popular solutions across geographies.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is also ideal for companies with diversified, global operations aspiring to keep all of their entities in one database for easier reconciliation and tracking. While the add-ons might allow companies to use Microsoft Dynamics Business Central for complex industrial operations, the natural design and core would be compatible with companies in industries such as non-profit, public sector, FMCG, F&B distribution, very light assembly manufacturing, telco, media, tech, energy, and utilities.

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC Comparison

Navigating the choice between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC across various critical dimensions.

Oracle Cloud ERPMS Dynamics 365 BC
Global Operational CapabilitiesEnterprise-grade multi-entity capabilities worldwide.Supported and actively installed in most countries globally.
Diverse CapabilitiesSupports varied business models, may need third-party add-ons for industry specifics.Supports multiple industries with pre-baked CRM and field service solutions.
Best-of-breed CapabilitiesSuite includes HCM, CPQ, WMS, RMS, TMS.Pre-integrated with Microsoft CRM and field service.
Last-mile Capabilities May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.
Operational FunctionalitiesDeeper supply chain and logistics capabilities.Emphasizes core ERP capabilities, relying on partner add-ons for industry-specific capabilities.
Integration CapabilitiesEnterprise-grade integration suite with pre-integrated components.Common data model, power platform and automate along with MS Azure platform for additional development and integration.
Manufacturing Capabilities Best value for focused manufacturing at subsidiary level.Lighter manufacturing capabilities than Acumatica.
Pricing ModelNamed user based.Per named user, per month. True consumption-based licenses can be adjusted without long-term contracts.
Key Modules1. Financial Management
2. Project Management
3. Procurement
4. Risk Management and Compliance
5. Enterprise Performance Management
6. Supply Chain and Manufacturing
7. ERP Analytics		1. Financial Management
2. CRM
3. Distribution Management
4. Supply Chain Management 
5. Project Accounting Management
6. Inventory Management
7. Reporting, Dashboard and BI

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

Oracle Cloud ERPMS Dynamics 365 BC
Financial ManagementGeneral LedgerEnterprise-grade ledgers to support multi-country operations at the global level with layers of sub-ledgers and complex closing process.Initiates general ledger postings, chart of accounts, general journals, VAT facilities, recurring journals, and source codes.
Accounts Receivable and Accounts PayableSupport for complex, global AR and AP processes, including shared services.Automates accounts receivables and payables and facilitates seamless reconciliation of accounts for swift and precise financial reporting.
Cash Flow ManagementEnterprise-grade capabilities for cash and treasury management.Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
Currency ManagementEnterprise-grade capabilities for currency management, including support for complex currency processes such as hedging.Manages multiple currencies across the system, including payables and receivables, general ledger reports, resource and inventory items, and bank accounts.
Tax ManagementGlobal and enterprise-grade tax management capabilities, with support for most countries in the world.Offers automated, configurable, and scalable tax determination, calculation, and settlement capabilities, accommodating complex tax scenarios across various business requirements.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Oracle Cloud ERPMS Dynamics 365 BC
Supply Chain ManagementWarehouse ManagementStreamlines warehouse operations, enhances inventory management and ensures seamless multichannel fulfillment, end-to-end inventory visibility, and integration with advanced features for efficient resource allocation and workflow optimization.Can be implemented in different complexity levels, depending on a company’s processes and order volume. The main difference is that activities are performed order-by-order in basic warehousing when they are consolidated for multiple orders in advanced warehousing.
Service ManagementEnsures efficient and effective service delivery through features like service request management, incident handling, and knowledge management.Service management is not built as part of the core platform but a pre-integrated specialized app is available for field service operations
Inventory Management Enables efficient management of goods flow, including inbound, within the warehouse, and outbound, while also supporting consigned inventory capabilities.Ensures inventory availability by automatically computing stock levels, lead times, and reorder thresholds. Also, maintains optimal inventory levels by adjusting orders dynamically based on real-time inventory updates.
Purchase Order ManagementHelps organizations digitally manage and process purchase orders for supply chain and procurement activities, improving efficiency and reducing overhead costs.Manages purchase orders, including blanket orders and related processes.
Requisition ManagementAllows users to efficiently view, create, submit, edit, and manage requisitions, ensuring proper approval workflows and seamless procurement processes.Organizes complex distribution processes involving multiple products and suppliers.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management ERP capabilities of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

Oracle Cloud ERPMS Dynamics 365 BC
Manufacturing ManagementProduction Planning Offers production planning capabilities including capacity planning, MRP, shop floor control, and demand planning.Enables the creation of production orders, definition of routings, allocation of resources, and optimization of production sequences, ensuring seamless operations.
BOM and RoutingAllows you to define lists of components associated with a parent item and outlines step-by-step operations required for manufacturing an assembly.Allows for the detailed mapping of production processes, including the components, subassemblies, and resources used, as well as the sequence of operations.
Advanced Planning and SchedulingPlans all supply chain facilities, supporting both short-term detailed scheduling and long-term aggregate planning within a single plan. It also considers finite capacity constraints and offers holistic optimization capabilities.Takes into account all demand and supply data, nets the results, and creates suggestions for balancing the supply to meet the demand, ensuring optimized resource utilization and efficient production control.

Pros of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

Oracle Cloud ERP MS Dynamics 365 BC
The product architecture supports the needs particularly of large, complex financial organizations with deep sub-ledger hierarchies.Natively supports global regions and also localizations where Acumatica, Epicor, or Infor might have limited support.
Oracle Cloud ERP has an ecosystem of experienced consultants capable of handling the architecture of such complex enterprises.Unlike several products, it has support for several European, Asian, and African countries where most products might struggle.
The embedded HCM and CRM processes are suitable for large non-profit organizations. The P2P workflows are friendlier for the indirect procurement needs of non-profit organizations.The data model is friendlier for FMCG and distribution companies requiring native support for complex features such as bin tracking or license plate support.
The workload Oracle Cloud ERP is designed to process millions of GL entries per hour.The product has been completely rearchitected using the cloud-native architecture. Cloud ERP capabilities are stronger than those of competing products.

Cons of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC across various operational and financial dimensions.

Oracle Cloud ERPMS Dynamics 365 BC
Transactional and financial traceability may not be intuitive for large enterprises.Primarily suited for FMCG-centric distributors; industrial distribution may need add-ons.
Data model and translations could overwhelm companies transitioning from QuickBooks.Ecosystem lacks integrations with best-of-breed eCommerce systems for industrial distribution.
Complex MRP runs might pose challenges for costing and scheduling.Financial traceability may not be intuitive for global, publicly traded non-profits.
Customization and configuration may take longer due to unnecessary functionality.Detailed data layers require significant consulting assistance.
P2P processes, CPQ, and manufacturing capabilities may not suit product-centric organizations.Microsoft lacks support for smaller products,thus leading to ERP implementation issues.
Limited last-mile functionality for quality and compliance, requiring add-ons or custom development.Vibrant marketplace, but last-mile capabilities for manufacturing or industrial distribution may be limited.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC hinges on several factors, including the scale of operations, industry focus, and specific business requirements. Oracle Cloud ERP stands out as a robust solution tailored for large enterprises, particularly excelling in industries like media, telecommunications, and healthcare. With its deep financial capabilities and seamless integration options, it also caters to organizations with extensive IT expertise seeking ledger-level security and hierarchical financial reporting. On the other hand, MS Dynamics 365 BC emerges as a compelling choice for SMBs and mid-sized companies experiencing growth beyond entry-level ERP systems. Its strength lies particularly in its global scalability, vibrant ecosystem, and intuitive user experience, making it ideal for companies with diverse, global operations within the $30-$250 million revenue range.

Thus, the selection process between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Dynamics 365 BC demands a thorough evaluation of organizational needs, operational priorities, and growth trajectories. While Oracle Cloud ERP offers enterprise-grade capabilities suited for complex financial structures and industry-specific requirements, MS Dynamics 365 BC provides a flexible, user-friendly solution tailored for SMBs with aspirations for global expansion. By weighing the pros and cons outlined in this review and also aligning them with strategic objectives, businesses can make an informed decision. Additionally, seeking assistance from independent ERP consultants can further aid in navigating the complexities of ERP selection. Thus, ensuring optimal outcomes for businesses in today’s dynamic market landscape.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

FREE RESOURCE

2025 Digital Transformation Report

This digital transformation report summarizes our annual research on ERP and digital transformation trends and forecasts for the year 2025. 

Download Now
Send this to a friend