Enterprise Architecture

Top 5 ERP Selection Inadequacies

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / January 22, 2024 March 17, 2025

ERP selection and ERP implementation are significant business initiatives for any organization. It’s a journey that involves numerous steps, each of which plays a critical role in determining the success of your ERP project. Often underestimated in their importance, the initial phases of the ERP selection set the stage for what follows. They form the backbone of your ERP implementation and can either pave the way for a seamless transition or introduce complex challenges that may threaten the ERP project’s success.

This blog delves into the essential ERP selection inadequacies and how they impact ERP implementation. By understanding the intricate link between ERP selection and ERP implementation, you can optimize the value of your ERP system while minimizing potential risks and pitfalls. Therefore, here are the top 5 ERP selection inadequacies and the issues they create for the ERP implementation phase. This explains why ERP selection and ERP implementation can’t be siloed initiatives.

1. Project Initiation

The ERP selection begins with project initiation, marked by a kickoff meeting and the creation of a project charter and stakeholder matrix. This initial phase sets the foundation of the ERP project. The project charter defines the project’s vision, goals, and KPIs for as-is and to-be states. It also establishes a budget and timeline, with the lack of which is a common mistake. Clear vision and goals lead to the creation of a stakeholder matrix, outlining roles, decision-making processes, and responsibilities. Hence, fosters accountability, supported by a core team, steering committee, and communication plan. Once the alignment is achieved, subsequent discovery workshops are conducted to collect and analyze data structures.

Top 5 Issues with Inadequate ERP Selection Process

Issues of Inadequate Project Initiation

One of the major ERP selection inadequacies that are persistent in ERP projects is inadequate project initiation. Being the very first step of the ERP project it lays the foundation and can also be the reason for a million-dollar disaster if not done right. Here are some of the issues that inadequate project initiation might create for you:

Unclear accountability: The lack of clear accountability often stems from potential issues from loud voices or overlooked opinions during decision-making. This increases the risk of undiscovered implications in the later stages of ERP implementation.
Executives overpowering: Executives overpowering in ERP implementation can lead to uninformed decisions as they may lack a detailed understanding of ground-level issues, particularly causing disruptions and inefficiencies in the implementation process.
Vague objectives: Vague objectives, such as a generic desire for a “fully integrated system” without specific definitions or budget constraints, can hinder ERP implementation by leading to misunderstandings and unrealistic expectations.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

2. Requirements Workshop

After completing the discovery phase, you’ll have a comprehensive set of requirements across various divisions. It’s crucial to assess existing systems to meet these needs and designate future systems for the task. Although, this shapes your enterprise architecture and workflow interactions, some ERP selection processes overlook this. Assuming ERP is a one-size-fits-all solution. Therefore, to avoid this host your requirements where they align, adhering to architectural and master data governance guidelines.

Requirement workshops review each need, ensuring an understanding of the as-is and to-be state. The team defines process boundaries and agrees on critical success factors, serving as a secondary validation to avoid omitting essential requirements. Therefore, critical success factors are critical needs that can make or break your ERP selection and ERP implementation. Organizations often focus on non-critical specifics, diverting from vital elements.

Issues of Inadequate Requirements Workshop

Requirements workshop is the very next step after the discovery phase, which is often overlooked by businesses. If not performed thoroughly, this can turn out to be one of the ERP selection inadequacies that can lead to misalignment with the business need. Therefore, here are some of the potential issues that inadequate requirements workshops might create for you:

Vague in defining requirements: Lack of expertise in defining requirements for ERP implementation can lead to vague and insufficiently detailed specifications. Critical assumptions can cause issues in system integrations particularly because vague expectations may have diverse interpretations. It may not align with with the specific needs of the business which is the primary objective of any ERP project.
Challenges in system use and reconciliation: Lack of expertise in identifying critical success factors in ERP implementation can lead to overlooking deeper implications, such as poor data models and financial control issues. It can ultimately cause challenges during system use and reconciliation.
System bias: Not defining requirements can often lead to system bias in ERP implementation, as individuals may base requirements on prior experiences with different systems. It can potentially overlook the unique aspects of the new model and rendering critical success factors invalid.

3. Business Process Re-engineering

In ERP selection, business process re-engineering is crucial, mostly influenced by current processes and desired outcomes. Skipping this phase due to cost concerns may often lead to technical overengineering and adoption challenges. An ERP consultant’s expertise is always advisable for assessing processes, even without extensive documentation. Process visualization is vital in this step, considering users’ varied ERP knowledge. This is to ensure clear expectations without contractual commitments.

This phase involves creating BPR maps and aligning processes with enterprise software in a vendor-agnostic way. The goal is to achieve an ERP dictionary-compliant state. Therefore, a detailed analysis is required to determine which processes need restructuring and the impact on information models and architecture. A rollout plan is often needed to follow an iterative approach, allowing for the gradual phase-out of legacy transactions and processes. This step is crucial in balancing stakeholder perspectives. While BPR prevents overengineering and meeting diverse users, the technical team often requires dual maps—user-centric and implementation-focused. Managing the as-is version internally and crafting impactful to-be maps demands specialized ERP implementation experience.

Issues of Inadequate Business Process Re-Engineering

Business process re-engineering is often not focused upon by most companies as it is thought to be a step that doesn’t require much expertise. This often leads to it being one of the ERP selection inadequacies that might result in several ERP implementation issues. Here are some of the issues that you might face:

Modeling broken processes: Lack of expertise in business processes during ERP implementation can lead to misconceptions, with individuals treating processes as simplistic and overlooking the need for expert knowledge. This results in modeling broken processes as requirements are misidentified.
Potential overengineering and integration issues: Lack of expertise in persuasion can hinder ERP implementation by impeding the ability to effectively communicate and justify necessary changes. This might lead to resistance from different departments, potential overengineering, and integration issues.
Challenges in ERP adoption: Relying on technology as a magic solution, without acknowledging the need for proper implementation and alignment with business processes, can lead to significant challenges in ERP adoption.
Misconceptions about processes: Lack of expertise in data during ERP implementation can lead to misconceptions about unique processes, as processes might be influenced by flawed data. Companies often rely on technical teams for data modeling, but these teams may lack the necessary business expertise, resulting in significant implementation challenges.

4. Data Re-engineering

In ERP selection, data re-engineering is often underestimated by 90% of companies, risking unnecessary complexities. Thorough data analysis and gap analysis are essential to identify areas requiring re-engineering. This process involves crucial layers like master data governance, and understanding intricate relationships between data hierarchies, processes, and system decisions. Maintaining master data integrity, especially when shared externally, is challenging but crucial for successful ERP implementation.

When we talk about master data governance, it goes beyond a system concept. It necessitates the definition of organizational workflows that transcend enterprise boundaries. This involves establishing data origination, maintenance responsibilities, and augmentation procedures. A source of authority matrix for each dataset is crucial in this process. Additionally, the implementation of reconciliation workflows is vital for analyzing transactional data reconciliation across system boundaries, identifying underlying issues in GL reconciliation scenarios, and informing decisions about process and system boundaries during ERP implementation.

Issues of Inadequate Data Re-engineering

ERP selection inadequacies might also occur when data re-engineering is ignored during the selection phase. This might happen due to the preconceived notion that this is a critical step in ERP implementation. It is a debatable topic as some might think this to be a practical decision whereas it might also lead to increased workload in some cases. Here are some issues that might occur due to inadequate data re-engineering:

Negative impact on process and system regeneration: Confusion between conducting data re-engineering in the ERP selection or implementation phases can be similar “chicken-and-egg who came first” problem. Delaying this critical step until the implementation phase may seem practical due to uncertainties in system selection. However, overlooking data re-engineering during selection can result in surprises, impacting both process and system regeneration, becoming a common challenge in ERP implementation.
Increased workload and failed automation efforts: Lack of experience in data-centric systems can lead to challenges in understanding and analyzing data flows within ERP implementations. It often results in unintended consequences such as increased workload, failed automation efforts, and compromised customer experience.

5. Enterprise Architecture Development

In ERP selection, developing enterprise architecture is crucial. This step assesses existing and new systems to establish the as-is and to-be states of data flow. It identifies department workflows, user transaction execution, and reconciliation processes to align business and technical teams.

Mapping user and department workflows is a key task in this step. It goes beyond primary system identification, extending to secondary and tertiary systems for root cause analysis. This system-level view is category-focused and independent of specific technologies. The next significant task is high-level design. It delineates component roles, responsibilities, and significant system messages. Unlike detailed technical aspects, it offers a broad view, aiding technical teams in understanding business outcomes. Following this, detailed design takes the spotlight. Technical teams craft specifications based on the high-level design, addressing intricacies such as error handling. This phased approach ensures a comprehensive understanding and alignment between business and technical aspects in the ERP selection phase.

Issues of Inadequate Enterprise Architecture Development

Having an unclearly defined enterprise architecture may often lead to one of the most critical ERP selection inadequacies. This is a common mistake made by businesses during ERP selection. ERP systems may not give the desired results due to the lack of a clear definition of the architecture. Here are some of the issues that might be created due to inadequate enterprise architecture development:

Challenges in managing conflicts: Lack of experience in diverse ERP systems can hinder implementation, leading to challenges in managing vendor conflicts and balancing the need for both broad and specialized perspectives in the project.
Over engineer ERP systems: Overengineering the ERP system due to a lack of a clearly defined enterprise architecture and data model can lead to hosting diverse requirements within ERP. This can cause an overload on specific systems (e.g., e-commerce or POS) and hinder the overall understanding of data flow implications across the architecture.
Misalignment between technical efforts and user expectations: Delaying technical decisions in ERP implementation by deferring architecture development may result in technical teams discovering obstacles in building the model. This is because critical assumptions were not thoroughly examined during the selection phase. It can also lead to a misalignment between technical efforts and user expectations. Users may find the implemented solution does not align with their needs, causing dissatisfaction and potentially requiring significant rework.
Hinders the alignment of system design with business needs: Lack of business perspective in ERP implementation can lead to a technical-centric focus, causing disinterest among business stakeholders. This hinders the alignment of system design with business needs and may result in implementation challenges.

Conclusion

While paving through the journey of ERP selection and implementation, recognizing the symbiotic relationship between these phases is very important. The decisions made during selection lay the foundation for a successful implementation. Similarly, the presence of one too many ERP selection inadequacies can also lead to failed ERP implementation. The careful alignment of your ERP system with your organization’s needs, the establishment of clear objectives, consensus among stakeholders, and the groundwork of efficient processes and reliable data ensure that the implementation phase is built on a solid base.

On the other hand, underestimating the importance of thorough work during selection can lead to costly and risky challenges during ERP implementation. The realization of this connection underscores the importance of a well-executed selection phase, which, in turn, guarantees a smoother, cost-effective, and less risky implementation process. This list of issues aims to offer you an overview of the interdependence between ERP selection and implementation, for you to discuss further with your independent ERP consultant.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What is the significance of project initiation in ERP selection, and how can it be a potential inadequacy?

Project initiation is crucial in ERP selection, defining the project’s vision, goals, and KPIs, along with roles and responsibilities. The lack of clear accountability, executive overpowering, and vague objectives during this phase can lead to ERP selection inadequacies, risking challenges in later implementation stages.

Why is the requirements workshop essential in ERP selection, and what issues may arise if not conducted thoroughly?

The requirements workshop, following the discovery phase, ensures a comprehensive understanding of needs and critical success factors. Inadequate workshops may result in vague requirements, challenges in system use and reconciliation, and system bias, impacting the alignment with business needs during ERP implementation.

How does business process re-engineering impact ERP selection, and what issues might arise if not given proper attention?

Business process re-engineering is crucial for aligning processes with desired outcomes. Inadequate focus may lead to modeling broken processes, potential overengineering, challenges in ERP adoption, and misconceptions about processes, impacting the success of ERP selection and implementation.

Top 4 ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

Leave a Comment / Blog, Distribution, Enterprise Architecture, Industrial Manufacturing, Retail / By Shrestha Dash / January 17, 2024 March 17, 2025

What is inventory? Inventory can be anything that has a financial value. It can be a product or a service. It is anything and everything that goes on your sales order or purchase order. Now, the second task is to manage your inventory efficiently. Before you know about efficient ERP inventory management best practices, let’s discuss the importance of coded inventory i.e. SKUs.

The Importance of Coded Inventory

So, when you look at your sales order, there will be a bunch of headers and product lines. The product lines are entered by SKUs. The whole idea of SKU is that once you have the ID, you grab the whole product information. You are bundling every single piece of information related to that product under that SKU.

Top 4 ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

Now, when you look at SKU, obviously there will be SKU numbers along with a lot of different layers. These layers can be either dependent or independent. Let’s understand this with an example. Suppose we have four different SKUs – 1100, 1101, 1102, and 1103 which are independent. Each SKU will further have multiple data points. Suppose the SKU number 1100 has 2000 different data points. What are these data points on the inventory level? These data points are going to be everything that defines that particular inventory, for example, a lot number.

The whole intent of keeping information bundled up is to make sure that your data entry is simplified. Let’s say you want to use this product anywhere in your system or any process. There are going to be 1000 to 2000 data points associated with each SKU. It could be weight, dimension, lot number, or any other attribute related to the product. If you have to enter 2000 different data points, you are going to go crazy. Therefore, you need some sort of description of your inventory that you can grab quickly.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Advanced Inventory Types

The way you model these SKUs defines what result you are going to get out of your ERP. Therefore, product modeling is very critical here. Now that we have cleared the basics, let’s dive into types of inventory. There are three kinds of inventory: dimensional inventory, piece inventory, and matrix inventory. Understanding each of them is important as it will make both your ERP selection and ERP implementation easier. Using an ERP system that does not support any one type of inventory might result in planning issues. It might also result in ad-hoc processes and increased admin effort in correlating dimensions on top of raw data.

1. Matrix Inventory

Let’s understand this concept with an example. Suppose there are two shoes and the only difference in the production perspective between them is the pigment used. One is black and the other is red. The way the manufacturing process works is how you organize the information. You reutilize as much as possible. The more you reutilize, the more financial efficiencies you are going to get from the process. So, these shoes could be manufactured in the same way as all their pieces except when it comes to mixing the pigment. But suppose now you want to change the assembly process for the black shoe.

You have to probably go to every black shoe variant and change this information as the data is not interconnected. This becomes a huge problem in industries like fashion and apparel where the demand is driven by style, season, etc. That’s where matrix inventory comes in handy. The whole intent of matrix inventory is to reutilize the information as much as possible by organizing it differently. As the name suggests it is planned exactly like a matrix.

The base SKU remains the same, but you can have other attributes like color, size, etc related to it. Because of this reason, the data related to the SKU is interconnected. So anytime there is going to be a change in the foundational SKU you are not necessarily going to multiple places and changing that.

2. Dimensional Inventory

The problems and intent of dimensional and matrix inventory are very much similar with few differences. Let’s understand this with two examples. So, whenever you go to a grocery store, you can scan a barcode and it gives all the details of the SKU. Let’s say you have chicken in the meat section of the store. Chicken no. 1 with SKU 1101, chicken no. 2 with SKU 1102, etc. These are very similar chickens with the only difference of the dimension – weight. Now, if the SKU of these chickens is not blended with the dimension weight, you cannot sell it. This is because you need to know this information while packaging when sold and charge the customers accordingly.

Now, for the second example. Let’s say you have a sheet metal and you are trying to cut it into different pieces of different dimensions for car manufacturing. The sheet metal will have an SKU, and so will each of its parts. But just the SKU won’t be enough and you are going to need some sort of attributes to be able to plan at the attribute level. So you are going to create some sort of attribute here, like heat number, and plan the inventory accordingly. It is similar to how the matrix inventory works in the retail industry but won’t have as many permutations and combinations as there are in retail.

3. Piece Inventory

Piece inventory comes in continuation of the dimensional inventory. Let’s take the same example of the sheet metal mentioned above. Now let’s say after entering the dimensions, you need the machine to cut the sheet metal into ten different pieces. But logically the machine can only cut the sheet metal into twelve pieces and not ten. So now, you have to decide what you do with those two pieces. What are the possibilities? One possibility is that you can simply throw it in the scrap. If you throw there is a financial value attached to it, which will make your pieces far more expensive. Another possibility could be you put these two extra pieces for some next job. Now this decision might create friction as it affects the entire production line.

This is where piece inventory should be planned. What do you do with these pieces? How do you organize these pieces? There is a functionality inside ERP in which once pieces are recognized, you have some flexibility in how they will be accounted for. So when you define this nesting process, the system already knows that it is going to create these two extra pieces. So whatever you define in this part of the algorithm, you can define them in advance so that you don’t have to impact your production process.

ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

Now that you know the difference between these three types of inventory it will help you design your inventory accordingly. Based on the industry types this will help in devising the ERP inventory management best practices for maximum financial efficiency. Below are the top 4 ERP inventory management best practices that you should always keep in mind before you design your inventory.

1. Mimic The Physical Process

Designing inventory systems that closely mirror the physical manufacturing process is one of the fundamental ERP inventory management best practices. By aligning the digital representation of inventory with its real-world counterpart, you can ensure seamless integration and a more accurate reflection of your operational reality. This strategy involves breaking down the manufacturing process into modular components, just as you would in the physical production of goods.

The goal here is to replicate and optimize the flow of materials and products throughout the entire supply chain. By doing so, you can identify bottlenecks, streamline workflows, and maximize resource utilization. This approach not only enhances efficiency but also minimizes discrepancies between digital records and the actual state of inventory, ultimately leading to more accurate forecasting and planning.

2. Balancing Data Entry

Balancing data entry from the user’s perspective is one of the critical ERP inventory management best practices. It ensures the accuracy and reliability of inventory information. While it’s essential to capture comprehensive data for each inventory item, a balanced approach avoids unnecessary complexity that may arise from overloading the system with redundant information. Prioritizing user-friendly data entry methods not only reduces the risk of errors but also enhances the speed of data input.

You should aim to strike a balance between collecting essential information for effective inventory management and ensuring that the data entry process remains intuitive for users. This strategy helps maintain data accuracy, streamlines processes and facilitates smoother collaboration among your teams involved in inventory management.

3. Expert Review of SKU Design

Engaging independent ERP consultants to review and optimize your SKU design aligned with ERP planning is one of the most effective ERP inventory management best practices. SKU design goes beyond mere identification codes; it involves structuring product information in a way that aligns with the broader goals of the ERP system. Subject matter experts in the field can provide valuable insights into industry best practices, ensuring that SKU design maximizes the capabilities of the ERP platform. This strategy involves considering not only current operational needs but also anticipating future requirements. Through expert review, you can fine-tune your SKU design to enhance scalability, flexibility, and overall adaptability to evolving market demands.

4. Multiple Rounds of Testing During ERP Implementation

Conducting multiple rounds of testing during the ERP implementation is considered crucial as one of the ERP inventory management best practices. This process involves simulating real-world scenarios to ensure that the inventory module functions effectively and aligns with the specific needs of the business. Testing helps identify potential issues, discrepancies, or inefficiencies before the system is fully deployed, reducing the risk of disruptions to day-to-day operations.

Independent ERP consultants play a critical role in this strategy by leveraging their knowledge to anticipate future requirements and forecast potential risks. Rigorous testing not only validates the functionality of the inventory module but also provides valuable insights into system performance, helping you to make informed decisions and adjustments before the ERP system becomes an integral part of your operational infrastructure.

Conclusion

If you are looking to implement ERP inventory management best practices, you must understand the type of inventory you need to design based on your industry. Each of them has its own merits when utilized efficiently for the desired results from the ERP systems. The whole intent here is to figure out what is the best way to organize the SKUs of your inventory. Understanding these concepts will also help reduce manual data entry, which reduces time spent on SKU maintenance and ultimately helps increase the financial margins. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What is the significance of SKUs in ERP inventory management?

SKUs, or stock keeping units, serve as unique identifiers for products within a sales or purchase order. They consolidate comprehensive product information, streamlining data entry and simplifying inventory organization. Utilizing SKUs enhances efficiency, reduces data entry complexities, and ensures quick retrieval of necessary information for various business processes.

How does matrix inventory benefit industries like fashion and apparel?

Matrix inventory facilitates efficient production planning by organizing product information in interconnected matrices. For industries driven by style and seasonal demands, such as fashion and apparel, matrix inventory allows for the reuse of information. This minimizes the need for repetitive data entry when making changes to foundational SKUs, addressing challenges associated with varying product attributes like color and size.

Why is conducting multiple rounds of testing crucial during ERP implementation for effective ERP inventory management?

Conducting rigorous testing during ERP implementation is vital to simulate real-world scenarios, identify potential issues, and ensure the seamless functionality of the inventory module. This proactive approach helps mitigate risks, reduces the likelihood of disruptions to daily operations, and provides valuable insights for making informed decisions and adjustments before the ERP system becomes an integral part of your operational infrastructure.

NetSuite ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture / By Shrestha Dash / January 15, 2024 March 17, 2025

What Is NetSuite ERP? NetSuite ERP is a powerful cloud-based ERP solution that empowers small to mid-sized businesses looking for a diverse cloud-native option particularly relying on add-ons for deep operational capabilities. Offering core ERP capabilities relevant to many industries, NetSuite ERP especially caters to modules spanning financial management, distribution, CRM, and supply chain management.

With the data model being friendly it is uniquely strong for industries especially hospitality, retail, and commerce-centric industries. In comparison with other cloud-native solutions that might be either weaker in their deep operational or broader capabilities, NetSuite ERP provides the best of both worlds for diverse organizations seeking a scalable solution that could scale with their business model and global growth.

Top 8 NetSuite Independent Review Insights

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Key Review Insights

1. Global Expansion and Subsidiary Management

NetSuite ERP has a robust capability to handle operations across 200 subsidiaries. Thus, proves to be a testament to its prowess in global expansion. The platform provides centralized control, enabling businesses to efficiently manage operations in various countries or subsidiaries in one database. NetSuite’s multi-entity support ensures that businesses can manage diverse entities with distinct financial structures seamlessly. Companies with multiple subsidiaries find value in the centralized control offered by NetSuite ERP especially fostering efficiency in managing operations across borders.

2. Deep Finance Capabilities

NetSuite ERP solution incorporates vital functionalities, particularly record-to-report (R2R), procure-to-pay (P2P), order-to-cash (OTC), fixed asset management (FAM), and services resource planning (SRP). Thus, providing the basic ERP capabilities for most industries, which need to be augmented by the add-ons provided through third-party add-ons. R2R ensures accuracy in financial reporting, P2P optimizes procurement processes, OTC manages the entire sales cycle, FAM efficiently handles fixed assets, and SRP enhances service-oriented businesses.

3. Best for Audit-ready SMBs

Role access control is a pivotal aspect of NetSuite ERP, offering companies the ability to define and manage user roles for audit-ready SMBs. The audit layers might not be as intuitive as larger ERP systems that might provide visual transactional maps but NetSuite ERP provides enough details for SMBs with the log of changes with each business object for easier traceability.

4. Scalable Solution for SMBs

Due to its diversified support for most business models that could also be augmented through the marketplace, it might take a while before SMBs outgrow NetSuite. The solutions that target specific business models or processes struggle with businesses that might be growing faster or might be active with M&A cycles.

5. eCommerce Friendly

NetSuite ERP demonstrates suitability for retail companies, with the marketplace options prevalent with eCommerce-centric operations and data models aligned for these companies, especially when it comes to integration options with many different channels and omnichannel architecture. However, cautionary notes arise for medical device companies, where user experiences highlight potential limitations in meeting specific industry needs. Industry-specific recommendations emphasize the importance of considering NetSuite ERP based on the unique requirements of each business.

6. Strong CRM Capabilities

Businesses benefit from a seamless CRM integration, especially if they are not planning to use a third-party best-of-breed solution, for which the integration might be cost-prohibitive. The Netsuite CRM can support several advanced capabilities, such as territory planning sales comp for complex channels, capabilities commonly found in mature CRM systems.

7. Vibrant Marketplace

NetSuite ERP has perhaps the most vibrant marketplace across the ecosystems, especially friendly for their core industries. Most cloud-native ISVs, such as vendor collaboration, WMS, or TMS software that might not be available with other ERP ecosystems, are available with NetSuite. This is a huge plus for businesses with diversified business models or companies that might have expectations to diversify in the near future as part of their growth.

8. Weaker for Industrial Companies

NetSuite’s manufacturing functionality comes under scrutiny, with user feedback expressing concerns about perceived depth. User concerns have shed light on potential limitations, prompting considerations for businesses with manufacturing needs. Businesses with manufacturing requirements need to carefully evaluate NetSuite ERP’s capabilities to ensure they align with the depth and complexity demanded by their operations.

Key Features of NetSuite ERP

Sales Order Management: It efficiently manages sales order types of different business models. It is also integrated with finance and fulfillment for end-to-end traceability.
Sourcing and Procurement: It has a centralized supply portal that ensures compliance in the purchasing process. It also includes forecasting abilities that can recalculate predictions based on actual fluctuations.
Warehouse Management: It streamlines warehouse operations, decreasing overhead and cycle times. This feature also enhances on-time delivery rates, improving customer retention and boosting revenue.
Production Management: This feature has basic production management capabilities, ideal for assembly-centric operations. It can be augmented by more mature solutions through third-party add-ons for richer industrial capabilities.
Accounting: It has comprehensive accounting features, covering invoicing, forecasting, and aiding in tax calculations based on factors like location and revenue.

Pros and Cons of NetSuite ERP

Pros	Cons
1. Ideal for SMBs operating in many countries.	1. Not fit for companies operating only in a few countries. Also, those looking for deeper operational capabilities provided as part of the suite and owned by OEM.
2. Cloud-native technology provides richer cloud capabilities, such as enterprise search and mobile capabilities, that might be weaker than other solutions.	2. Not the best fit for companies for which operational capabilities might be a bigger critical success factor than cloud-native features.
3. Ideal for publicly traded and audit-ready companies because of the built-in SOX compliance capabilities.	3. Not ideal for startups with simpler operating models. They might find audit-centric and deep financial capabilities over-bloated.
4. Ideal for service-centric SMBs because of the integrated PSA, HCM processes, and subscription billing.	4. Not fit for industrial companies looking for deep operational capabilities built as part of the core solution.
5. Ideal for eCommerce-centric SMBs because the pre-integrated add-ons and data models are friendlier for these industries.	5. Not fit for companies deep into B2B workflows because the pricing, discounting, and product models are not scalable.
6. Ideal for holding and private equity companies looking to host diverse business models on one solution.	6. Not fit for companies without expected changes in the business model in the near future.
7. Ideal for companies looking for talent available in most countries.	7. The experience with support might vary depending on the vendors involved with the engagement.
8. Ideal for companies looking to find best-of-breed tools and can’t replace edge solutions mandated by the OEM.	8. Not fit for companies seeking OEM-owned integration with core operational systems such as CAD or PLM.

Conclusion

In summary, NetSuite ERP stands as a robust and versatile cloud-based ERP solution. It provides businesses with the automation and centralization needed for efficient operations. Offering a comprehensive suite of functionalities, from financial management to distribution and CRM, NetSuite ERP proves flexible and adaptable.

However, careful consideration is crucial, particularly for businesses with complex operational needs. NetSuite’s strengths in global expansion, core functionalities, CRM capabilities, third-party integrations and add-ons make it an excellent choice for SMB businesses. Especially in the retail, hospitality, and service-centric industries. Yet, users must navigate potential pitfalls, such as limited operational capabilities, reliance on third-party add-ons, and challenges for smaller implementations. In evaluating NetSuite ERP, understanding its key features, pros, and cons becomes imperative. This ensures alignment with the unique operational requirements of each business. This NetSuite ERP independent review intends to provide you with unbiased insights for further discussion with your independent ERP consultants.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

How does NetSuite ERP support businesses in achieving global expansion, and what advantages does it offer?

NetSuite ERP is instrumental in facilitating global expansion by efficiently handling operations across 200 subsidiaries. This capability provides centralized control, fostering efficiency for businesses managing operations in various countries or subsidiaries.

What factors contribute to NetSuite ERP being scalable for SMBs?

What makes NetSuite ERP a powerful solution for businesses?

NetSuite ERP is a robust cloud-based solution automating processes across diverse industries. With comprehensive functionalities spanning financial management, distribution, CRM, and supply chain management, it offers flexibility, adaptability, and a relatively low cost of ownership.

Top 10 ERP Pricing Implementation Considerations

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / January 10, 2024 March 17, 2025

ERP pricing implementation is not as easy. It brings forth many challenges. Some of them include managing and integrating vast amounts of pricing data, ensuring pricing consistency across various platforms, keeping pricing information up-to-date in real time, staying compliant with industry regulations, and so on. The list goes on. When it comes to pricing, ERP systems have several business rules at various levels. And understanding the nuances of these layers is crucial for pricing to work as your expectations.

When we talk about ERP pricing implementation, it helps in supporting complex pricing structures and provides the users with the most accurate experiences. It creates a seamless experience between operations and customer experiences. Enabling ERP pricing implementation means customers are receiving the most accurate pricing data that helps them with their purchase decisions. Businesses also gain the freedom to tier their pricing and discounts catered to certain customers and manage their sales. This blog delves into the top 10 ERP pricing implementation considerations.

Top 10 ERP Pricing Implementation Considerations - Infographic

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

1. Product Portfolio

While ERP pricing implementation, one of the critical factors that can significantly impact the integration is the intricacy of your product portfolio. For example, a company will face multiple challenges if it has a diverse product range. The need for multiple pricing tiers arises when dealing with various products, especially customizable ones. In this case, the company will have to publish the pricing in the market configure pricing in the ERP system, and e-commerce pricing. The result will be a complex web of pricing structures, leading to confusion in customer-facing situations.

The customer’s ordering experience will become a puzzle. This is because pricing depends on the channel through which the opportunity flows into the system. This will create challenges in managing repeat orders and introduce manual processes, making consistency a rare commodity. The lesson learned here is clear. When navigating the ERP pricing implementation, it’s crucial to streamline and simplify your product portfolio.

Strategies to Simplify Product Portfolios

Assess the performance of each product, identify the top-performing products, and consider phasing out those that contribute minimally to revenue.
Concentrate on your core products that align with your brand identity and meet the primary needs of your target audience.
Identify and eliminate redundant or overlapping products that serve similar purposes.
Listen to customer feedback and analyze demand patterns. Use this information to prioritize products that are in high demand.
Regularly review the lifecycle of each product. Consider discontinuing products that are at the end of their lifecycle and invest in innovation for new ones.
Create bundled offerings or packages that group related products together. This not only simplifies the purchasing decision for customers but also helps in promoting specific product combinations.

2. Pricing Dynamics

When we talk about pricing dynamics, several factors come into play, each influencing the cost structure and strategies employed by distributors and manufacturers. Understanding and navigating these diverse pricing dynamics are crucial during ERP pricing implementation. This understanding enables effective configuration of the ERP systems to accommodate different pricing structures. It also helps align them with the specific needs of the business. It also ensures pricing data accuracy and consistency within the ERP system. Businesses can adopt more customer-centric pricing strategies when they understand the pricing dynamics properly. They stay adaptable to market changes or shifts in demands and competition.

Key Dimensions in the Pricing Equation

Base Pricing. The foundation of any pricing strategy is the base pricing set by the distributor or manufacturer. This serves as the initial benchmark for products, reflecting their inherent value and influencing subsequent pricing adjustments.

Warehouse-Based Pricing. Introducing another layer of complexity, warehouse-based pricing depends on the geographical location of a warehouse. The same product may be priced differently based on the region or country where the warehouse is situated. This dynamic is driven by logistical considerations, regional cost variations, and market demands specific to each location.

Customer-Based Pricing. Adopting a customer-based approach, products are priced differently depending on the target audience. For retail customers, prices factor in elements like demand, competition, and perceived value for end consumers. Distribution customers, purchasing in bulk, face a different pricing structure. Manufacturers or distributors need to consider providing margins to accommodate the larger volumes bought by distributors, aligning pricing strategies with the distinct needs and purchasing behaviors of various customer segments.

Seasonal or Event-Based Pricing. Introducing a temporal dimension to the pricing equation, seasonal or event-based pricing strategies mean products may be priced differently during specific seasons, festivals, or events. This reflects the fluctuating demand and market dynamics tied to these timeframes.

3. Forms of Discounting

Discounting serves as a strategic layer atop the pricing structure, offering businesses a nuanced approach to adjust product costs and respond to various market dynamics. The ways that different forms of discounting affect the ERP pricing implementation are similar to how the pricing dynamics affect it. But there are some additions to it. Understanding this concept also helps businesses optimize costs in response to regional market demands. It helps in customer segmentation for more personalized and effective pricing.

Key Dimensions in the Discounting Framework

Base Discount. Applying a percentage reduction to the foundational base pricing, the base discount serves as a dynamic tool. It allows businesses to maintain a clear baseline for product values while introducing flexibility and responsiveness to market conditions, ensuring competitiveness without compromising perceived product value.

Location-Based Discounts. Providing an additional dimension to the discounting framework, location-based discounts optimize costs in response to regional market demands. These discounts tailor pricing strategies to specific warehouse locations, addressing pricing variations influenced by logistical, operational, or market-specific considerations.

Customer-Based Discounts. Extending adaptability to different customer segments, customer-based discounts cater to the unique needs of retail and distribution customers. This approach allows businesses to foster stronger relationships, enhance market penetration, and customize pricing for individual and bulk purchases.

Event-Based Discounts. Tied to seasons, festivals, or specific occasions, event-based discounts introduce a time-sensitive element. This dynamic enables businesses to align pricing strategies with the pulse of the market during specific periods, providing the agility to respond effectively to changing market dynamics.

4. Distribution Channels

Industries operating through multiple distribution channels, involving layers like manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, face unique challenges in devising pricing strategies. Each channel requires tailored pricing structures to address the distinct needs of intermediaries and end customers. This complexity is heightened without a unified pricing management system, making navigating and managing diverse pricing models effectively challenging. This disparity necessitates centralized control for effective management, especially considering the underlying thread of inventory that ties everything together.

5. Regulatory Challenges

Companies in sectors like healthcare, finance, or pharmaceuticals are bound by stringent regulations that significantly influence pricing strategies. Regulatory requirements may demand transparency in pricing, impose controls on pricing structures, or mandate compliance with specific pricing guidelines. Navigating these regulatory intricacies while maintaining competitive pricing adds complexity for businesses. As businesses strive for a unified and consistent pricing approach, navigating the regulatory landscape becomes critical to successful ERP pricing implementation.

6. Source of Truth

Ensuring a seamless ERP pricing implementation hinges on having a single, authoritative source of truth for pricing data. The ERP system emerges as this bedrock, embodying the most current and accurate pricing information. An architectural approach is often advocated that minimizes manual touches and ensures the fewest number of interactions. The crux lies in understanding the internal implications and how the architecture aligns with customer needs.

Despite potential organizational resistance, establishing the ERP as the unambiguous source of truth is the key to internal and external satisfaction. The critical role of the ERP system in pricing integration is magnified, particularly in contrast to the pitfalls of relying on third-party systems or maintaining pricing information in disparate locations. This narrative reinforces the need for a centralized control mechanism, emphasizing the ERP as the linchpin for consistent and accurate pricing across diverse channels.

7. Data Silos

A critical factor demanding attention is the emergence of data silos when utilizing pricing software or external tools, especially in contexts involving dynamic pricing or intricate formulas. A centralized source of truth is of utmost importance to prevent the potential pitfalls of neglecting consistent auditing within the ERP. The pricing information residing in various channels such as published pricing in the market, ERP-configured pricing, and e-commerce pricing, introduces challenges in maintaining consistency and accuracy, particularly when dealing with repeat orders from different channels.

8. Complexity of CPQ

Integrating CPQ systems requires extensive product details, customer information, and pricing data. Notably, sales and marketing teams resist direct engagement with ERP systems for quoting, further complicating the integration process. The inherent complexity of CPQ systems demands meticulous integration work, creating two-way loops within the ERP architecture. This further underscores the critical importance of addressing the challenges posed by CPQ integration to ensure a streamlined and efficient ERP implementation.

Some of these complexities involve data inconsistencies, the need to handle things externally, and the importance of having a structured pricing process. While there may be differences in opinions regarding the integration’s feasibility, the consensus is that maintaining a clear master-slave relationship, with the ERP system being the master, can help ensure successful ERP pricing implementation.

9. Two-way Integration

The criticality of seamless connectivity between CPQ systems and ERP involves a sophisticated two-way data flow mechanism where pricing details undergo dynamic changes based on evolving product configurations and customer requirements. Failure to consistently audit and manually check the ERP system introduces a cascade of problems, with a specific example illustrating challenges related to published pricing, ERP-configured pricing, and e-commerce pricing. The complexity arises when determining how to price an order, depending on the channel through which the opportunity is initiated. This manual process can lead to discrepancies, especially in repeat orders, creating a compelling argument for centralizing data within the ERP system.

10. Purchase Price

Navigating the landscape of ERP pricing implementation involves not only addressing pricing complexities on the sales side but also delving into the often-overlooked realm of the purchase price. The interconnected nature of the buying and selling sides of the business is often emphasized, stressing the importance of aligning these aspects to ensure overall consistency and efficiency. This advocates for a centralized control system within the ERP, despite potential challenges in getting the entire organization on the same page. It argues that treating the ERP as the source of truth for pricing data, even when residing in different channels, leads to better internal and external service in the long run.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, the blog stresses the need for businesses to address the challenges of ERP pricing implementation and advocates for centralized pricing data to mitigate these challenges. It emphasizes the impact of discounting forms, the intricacies of managing distribution channels, and the influence of regulatory requirements on pricing strategies. The central theme revolves around establishing the ERP system as the authoritative source of truth for pricing data. Despite potential resistance, the blog asserts that making the ERP the linchpin for consistent and accurate pricing across diverse channels is vital for internal and external satisfaction. It advocates for a centralized control mechanism within the ERP, underscoring its critical role in successful pricing integration.

Moreover, if you are contemplating ERP pricing implementation, it is essential to consider the factors that may impact your outcomes in the future. Understanding the dynamics of pricing and discounting adds another layer of insight to inform this decision-making process. Armed with this knowledge, you’ll be better equipped to engage in a meaningful and informed discussion with independent ERP consultants who serve as subject matter experts in this field. Collaborating with experienced ERP consultants becomes a strategic step in optimizing your pricing strategies and fostering a streamlined integration that stands the test of time.

FAQs

Why is it crucial to streamline and simplify the product portfolio during pricing integration with ERP systems?

Managing a diverse product range introduces complexities in pricing structures, potentially leading to confusion for customers. Streamlining the product portfolio simplifies pricing, enhances customer experience, and ensures consistency across channels.

How does understanding pricing dynamics contribute to effective pricing integration with ERP systems?

Pricing dynamics, including base pricing, warehouse-based pricing, customer-based pricing, and event-based pricing, influence the cost structure and strategies employed by businesses. Understanding these dynamics enables businesses to configure ERP systems effectively, ensuring accurate and consistent pricing data.

Why is the ERP system emphasized as the ‘source of truth’ for pricing data during integration, and how does it enhance internal and external satisfaction?

The ERP system serves as the authoritative source of pricing data, minimizing manual touches and ensuring consistency. Centralizing data within the ERP promotes accuracy, efficiency, and overall satisfaction internally and externally, aligning diverse channels and facilitating a streamlined integration process.

Top 10 Practices for Pricing and Discounting in ERP

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / January 8, 2024 March 17, 2025

There are a lot of different ways of implementing pricing and discounting in ERP. But there’s always a debate in terms of which is the right system to implement. When we look at pricing, there are always going to be layers and layers of pricing rules. When we look across the industry, some people implement static pricing, which refers to setting prices periodically. It is often based on cost movements.

Secondly, there’s dynamic pricing, which means that prices can change frequently, sometimes even daily. It is to maximize profit or competitiveness like in e-commerce businesses. Lastly, there’s commodity-based pricing, which industries use where the cost of materials or goods fluctuates. Most of the time, the pricing is based on standard costs, which are generally planned costs that can be updated at periodic intervals.

This ignites the debate on where pricing should be managed—within the ERP system or externally. Businesses that lack control and consistency in their pricing strategies often face challenges such as maintaining complex distribution channels, tracking discounts and promotions, and handling overtime maintenance. These challenges call for centralized control over pricing offered by an ERP system.

Top 10 Practices for Pricing and Discounting in ERP

Using an ERP system also eliminates the need for manual pricing decisions. It automates pricing calculations based on predefined rules, reducing errors and saving time. Many industries still resist adopting pricing and discounting processes, despite the advantages that ERP brings to the table. In this blog, we will discuss the top 10 best practices for ERP pricing and discounting processes that will help overcome this resistance.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

1. Pricing Simplification

When dealing with resistance from team members or departments, it’s crucial to ask fundamental questions about the complexity of the existing pricing model. The first question is whether the complexity is truly necessary or if it has evolved without clear justification. Complex pricing models can lead to numerous challenges, such as incorrect order bookings, increased potential for human errors, and data entry discrepancies. Misaligned data between the teams responsible for pricing and those responsible for order entry can have significant consequences. It can also impact margins, financial reporting, and overall revenue accuracy.

Simplifying the pricing model leads to a more streamlined and manageable pricing structure, which not only reduces the chances of errors but also enhances overall efficiency. One way to achieve simplification is by categorizing customers, products, or pricing levels and starting with a broader, more straightforward structure. Then, refinements and adjustments can be made as needed.

2. Prevent Human Errors

When different teams are responsible for pricing and discounting data entry, it increases the risk of mistakes and inconsistencies in the pricing process. These errors can have far-reaching consequences, including incorrect pricing, impacting the organization’s profitability and customer satisfaction. Managing pricing and discounting within the ERP system significantly reduces the likelihood of such errors and discrepancies.

Human errors, such as typographical mistakes, miscalculations, or misinterpretations of pricing rules, can result in incorrect pricing on sales orders or invoices. These discrepancies not only impact the immediate transaction but can have a cascading effect, affecting the company’s financial statements and reporting. Maintaining pricing and discounting within the ERP system can mitigate these risks by providing a centralized platform where pricing data can be controlled, validated, and consistently applied. Additionally, automation and validation rules can help catch and prevent errors, ensuring that pricing remains accurate.

3. Tackle Data Entry Challenges

Managing pricing and discounting outside the ERP system presents significant challenges in terms of data entry accuracy and consistency. It’s often difficult to convince organizations to maintain pricing and discounting within the ERP system, and this reluctance can lead to various implications, especially when different teams are involved in the process. Discrepancies may emerge due to the lack of a centralized control mechanism. Various teams may have their interpretations and ways of entering pricing data, leading to inconsistencies and errors.

These discrepancies can not only affect day-to-day operations but can also have broader implications, impacting an organization’s financial statements, profitability, and customer satisfaction. The risk of data entry errors looms large, as any disconnect between those responsible for setting pricing and those managing data entry leaves room for mistakes, leading to many issues. Ultimately, the integrity and accuracy of data become challenging to maintain.

4. Maintain Consistency in Financial Data

When pricing and discounting are managed outside the ERP system, several challenges occur. Incorrect pricing, whether due to complexity or siloed departments, can have a far-reaching impact on a business. Even minor pricing errors can accumulate over time, resulting in inaccuracies in financial statements. A pricing structure that is too complex or fragmented can lead to errors in booking orders, creating discrepancies that accumulate over time.

These discrepancies ultimately affect an organization’s profit margins, financial reporting, and the general ledger. Maintaining pricing within the ERP system is the solution to mitigate these challenges. By doing so, organizations can ensure that their financial data remains consistent and accurate. This approach reduces the chances of human errors and ensures that data integrity is maintained throughout the organization.

5. Encourage a Step Back

Reconsider your pricing strategy and its complexity. Also, discuss the benefits of broad pricing rules that can later be refined. Embracing an ERP system for pricing can be challenging, but it’s essential to understand the implications of your pricing strategy and the advantages of a more flexible approach. By asking questions like, “Does it need to be this complex?” and “Why is it so complicated?” organizations can prompt a critical evaluation of their pricing practices. This questioning can lead to a realization that simplification is possible and can result in more straightforward, manageable pricing structures.

6. Automation and Integration

One compelling argument for maintaining pricing and discounting within the ERP is the automation and integration benefits it offers. When pricing rules are established within the ERP system, it can automatically compute prices based on various parameters such as customer, product, quantity, and more. This high level of automation saves both time and effort while also significantly reducing the risk of manual errors. ERP systems are also well-suited for seamless integration with other business processes, guaranteeing the consistent and accurate dissemination of pricing data throughout the organization. This means that prices are calculated consistently, from sales orders to invoices and across various touchpoints within the organization, ensuring that everyone works with the same pricing data.

7. Integration Requirements

When businesses opt for pricing and discounting outside of their ERP systems, it often necessitates developing complex data flows and integrations to ensure that pricing data is transferred accurately between various systems and departments. This is because pricing is closely tied to other processes, such as order booking and financial reporting, and ensuring consistency and accuracy in data flows becomes crucial. Without proper integration, data discrepancies can arise, leading to errors in pricing and resulting in financial and operational complications.

Furthermore, maintaining data accuracy for pricing is essential, irrespective of whether pricing and discounting is managed within or outside the ERP. Accurate pricing data is the foundation of fair transactions and profit margins. Inaccuracies can lead to errors in customer orders and invoicing, which can erode customer trust and impact financial performance. By emphasizing the need for data accuracy, it becomes evident that pricing data integrity is vital, and this can best be achieved by keeping pricing within the ERP system.

8. ERP User Interface Simplification

Customizing the user interface of an ERP system can be a powerful solution for making it more accessible to marketers. By customizing the user interface, it is possible to streamline and simplify the user experience. It makes it more user-friendly. This customization can involve creating simplified screens, reducing the number of fields, and focusing on the essential information required for pricing decisions. By doing so, marketers and other users can interact with the ERP system more comfortably. The ERP interface can be tailored to their specific needs and preferences.

9. Encourage Collaboration

To address the reluctance of some departments and promote collaboration, organizations should encourage a cross-functional approach to pricing. This emphasizes shared responsibility for data accuracy. In this context, it’s vital to establish common ground and understanding of the pricing process across departments. Instead of viewing pricing management as the sole responsibility of one department, organizations should highlight that pricing impacts multiple aspects of the business. This may including sales, finance, and marketing.

By fostering collaboration, various teams can contribute their expertise and insights to create more effective and well-rounded pricing strategies. Additionally, collaboration helps streamline the flow of information and communication. When multiple departments collaborate, it becomes easier to maintain data accuracy and ensure pricing decisions are based on up-to-date and consistent information.

10. Workflow and Approval Improvements

In the context of streamlining pricing and discounting changes, improving workflow and approval processes within the ERP is critical. Addressing resistance by educating stakeholders on the ERP’s architecture, data flows, and integration challenges, making it clear that maintaining pricing in the ERP is not as daunting as it may seem is important. By improving workflow and approval processes, organizations can create efficient systems for managing pricing changes. This can significantly reduce the complexities associated with pricing management while ensuring data accuracy and streamlined processes within the ERP.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, the blog dives into the details of best practices for pricing and discounting in ERP. Mainly highlighting the ongoing debate regarding where these critical processes should be managed – within an ERP system or externally. It emphasizes that pricing complexity often leads to multiple layers of rules. The blog discusses three primary pricing approaches: static pricing, dynamic pricing, and commodity-based pricing. While acknowledging the diversity of preferences, it emphasizes the importance of centralizing control over pricing within an ERP system.

The blog also talks about simplifying pricing models, preventing human errors and discrepancies, and tackling data entry challenges. All of which can adversely impact profit margins and financial reporting when pricing is managed externally. It further encourages a step back to rethink pricing strategies and adopt broader rules that can later be refined. Automation, integration, and improving the ERP user interface are identified as crucial aspects that can help businesses create a compelling case for pricing within the ERP system. The blog also highlights the importance of encouraging department collaboration and making workflow and approval processes more efficient. It also outlines a set of best practices to overcome resistance and successfully manage pricing and discounting processes within an ERP system. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

How can organizations encourage departments to collaborate for effective pricing?

To promote collaboration among departments for pricing, organizations should emphasize shared responsibility for data accuracy and establish a common understanding of the pricing process across different teams. Instead of viewing pricing management as the sole responsibility of one department, organizations should highlight that pricing impacts various aspects of the business, including sales, finance, and marketing. Collaboration streamlines information flow and communication, making it easier to maintain data accuracy and ensure pricing decisions are based on up-to-date and consistent information.

Why does centralizing pricing within an ERP system is always recommended, and what are the advantages?

There are a few benefits of centralizing pricing within an ERP system, like it eliminates the need for manual pricing decisions, automates pricing calculations based on predefined rules, reduces errors, and saves time. This centralization provides a single, consistent platform for pricing control, validation, and application. It mitigates the risks of human errors and discrepancies, improves data integrity, and enhances overall efficiency in pricing and discounting processes.

What are the different pricing approaches, and how do they impact business processes?

There are generally three primary pricing approaches: static pricing, dynamic pricing, and commodity-based pricing. Static pricing involves setting prices periodically, often based on cost movements. Dynamic pricing allows prices to change frequently, sometimes daily, to maximize profit or competitiveness, especially in e-commerce businesses. Commodity-based pricing links product prices directly to the price of key commodities like copper. These approaches have various implications for business processes, and the choice between them can significantly affect pricing strategies.

Top 10 ERP Contract Terms

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture / By Shrestha Dash / January 3, 2024 March 17, 2025

Requiring substantial expertise to understand their implications, ERP contract are cryptic. While legal expertise might help negotiate and comprehend the language, you won’t understand the true implications unless you have expertise with many software packages, enterprise architecture, and licensing arrangements. Also, the ERP contract terms change as vendors update their pricing and configuration, more frequently than you would expect.

Also, the challenge is not just the complexity of ERP contracts. It’s also the refined negotiation skills of ERP salespeople. With proprietary knowledge to their advantage, they are trained negotiators. Unless you have access to the same proprietary knowledge to be at the same level, you can never beat them. And having this knowledge is only possible when you have someone with a similar skillset on your side. This is why ERP selection consultants and ERP sales reps make a good offense and defense combination.

Finally, most buyers are so biased in seeking discounts and the cheapest quote, with a limited attention span to identify and understand the risks buried with ERP contracts. The risks could be as severe as data loss or not understanding the ownership of components packaged with the software. The ERP contract terms outlined below will help you identify the risks buried with the ERP contracts and avoid any surprises after signing one.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

1. Editions and Modules

Understanding editions and modules and how they map to each SKU in ERP contracts is essential to avoid financial surprises post signing. Not familiar with editions and modules and how they work? Software vendors commonly price their products based on editions and modules. The main challenge with editions and modules is their overlap and configuration bundles, which means different bundling arrangements might have the exact same outcome but very different price points and risk profiles. So you need to make sure that you have the complete grasp of the fine lines around editions and modules.

To get the maximum discount, experiment with different configurations of editions and modules. But, don’t forget to understand their limitations. This requires a deep probing of how these editions and modules are structured and function, which may go beyond what the sales representatives can provide.

2. License Terms

Even the most friendly ERP OEMs who claim to be consumption-based would require you to commit to the ERP contract terms, with very little flexibility in making any changes. The variables that have an impact because of the license term would be the number of users, types of licenses, and tiers of licenses. As well as the scope and duration of the agreement.

Once the contract is signed, scaling up the number of seats or expanding the scope of your ERP system is generally straightforward as this leads to additional revenue for them. But scaling down is a revenue loss for them, so they are likely to make it as difficult as possible. In most cases, prorated adjustments to your ERP contract terms might not be possible, unless the agreement explicitly articulates this provision.

3. User Access and User Types

Each ERP system and vendor is likely to have very different user access tiers and types. Even among different versions of the same product, the user access and types might vary. The user access and types could have several variables such as limited access vs full access users. Concurrent vs named users. Devices licenses vs application users. They each have implications on what users will do with the application and might drive the total contract value substantially.

Unless you have gone through rounds of due diligence, which is rare for most companies due to the amount of effort and investment required in the selection phase. Also, the perceived limited value of the due diligence might trigger companies to short-circuit the due diligence process, and because of this architecture might not be fully developed, limiting the visibility into access types required. You might also not have complete visibility into users’ workflow and how they will be using the software.

These issues collectively might drive changes to user access and types, leading to substantial financial surprises after signing the contract, which even the initially offered discounts might not be able to make up for. Therefore, it’s essential to perform the due diligence to an extent where you have relative confidence in the total contract value. And you are not being myopic with discounts. The ERP selection consultants can help you plan the user access and types better with limited financial surprises.

4. Reseller Tiers

Generally dictated by ERP publishers, each reseller is generally at a specific tier, which drives their discount and pricing, as well as the price and discounts they can offer you. The OEM typically determines these tiers based on various factors, such as the reseller’s sales performance, expertise, and commitment to selling the OEM’s products, including ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software and services.

OEMs often provide more generous discounts to new resellers to their partnership program. This is a strategic move to encourage newer partners to sell the ERP software and services actively, essentially helping the OEM build their customer base and expand their market presence. But wait, this might only be applicable for the first few deals, after that they are likely to lose this privilege as they will need to match the performance with their larger peers to be able to receive the same discounts.

Understanding their tier would be especially critical while switching resellers. The discount ERP contract terms and the overall agreement may not be the same with a new reseller as with the previous one. Therefore, it’s essential to carefully analyze the implications and terms of such a change to ensure it aligns with the company’s objectives and budget.

5. Discounts

Each vendors have their own discounting strategy, some keep their list pricing higher and discount heavily. The others, on the other hand, are likely to offer much lower discounts. The discounts could be up to 50-60% off the original list price, but they might also vary per line item. This is especially true with implementation and support line items. They might not offer as deep discounts. Some discounts might be available only in certain regions or with certain types of resellers, depending upon the strategic priority of the OEM.

Some discounts could also be timely. The discounts are likely to be higher in Q4 as ERP vendors might be trying to meet their numbers for the year and might offer much heavier discount. While planning your ERP implementation around discounts is a great idea, don’t make your decisions purely based on discounts. This is especially true while signing the ERP contracts. Don’t rush to sign an ERP contract just because the discounts might expire. Generally, ERP vendors match up the offer if the decision is likely to be purely based on price especially if they might not have a true differentiator.

The discounting might vary per rep as well, just because ERP vendors carry hundreds of SKUs and several different pricing and discounting strategies. Depending upon the skillset of the rep, you might not the best discount just because they might not understand all permutations and combinations. This is where ERP selection consultants can help. They have access to thousands of their previous quotes and can compare the discount at the line level, ensuring maximum discounts, without assuming unnecessary risk that might lead to financial surprises.

6. Price Lock

The decision about how long to sign the ERP contract might be tricky. If you sign up for a longer term and if the software doesn’t work to your expectations, you might be locked in the contract even if you are not able to use the software. But the shorter the term, the lower the discount. In the case of implementation issues, most ERP vendors might offer suggestions such as changing resellers or another round of implementation methodology but if there are serious implementation challenges due to the design of the software, you may end up losing even more. This would be true even after paying for the full term of the contract, without getting any value from the software.

So depending upon the risk profile of the project, you need to assess the right length of the contract. Don’t sign for longer term contracts purely because of discounts. Make an informed decision based on the risk profile of your implementation.

7. More Users/Feature Discount Guarantee

This clause addresses the situation where an organization plans to expand its usage of the ERP system by adding more users or activating additional features beyond what was initially agreed upon in the ERP contract. In such cases, the software vendor might have mechanisms to negotiate the pricing for these additional users or features.

Instead of guaranteeing the cheapest initial quote, some ERP vendors provide a different kind of assurance – a discount guarantee for future purchases or modifications. This means that if you decide to scale up your ERP usage by adding more users or enabling new features, the vendor commits to providing you with the same discounted rate, ensuring that you don’t pay the expensive list price.

By including this clause, you ensure that the favorable pricing and discounts you negotiated during the initial contract negotiation phase will still be applicable even when you make changes to the ERP system. This can help avoid unexpected expenses, accommodating your to-be state as you learn more about your needs in the implementation phase.

8. License Price Increase

Most ERP vendors understand that customers are not likely to switch from their ERP system once they are settled on it. Also, winning an ERP deal is extremely challenging because of the same issue. For these reasons, ERP vendors offer substantial discounts in the initial years. But the increase is likely to be steep with renewal.

Sometimes the increase might be so steep that smaller companies might struggle to afford it. That’s why negotiating a license price increase is essential. Some vendors are fair and they might not increase more than 5% and will be willing to include that provision. The other vendors might be tricky to work with and might discount the pricing so much in the initial years that a 5% increase or including such provision might not be feasible. Have a clause for the license increase baked in as part of the contract, even if you sign a shorter term contract.

Also, coverage of all items as part of the license price increase clause is critical. In some cases, if several third-party add-ons are included as part of the solution, the ERP vendor might not be able to guarantee the license price increase on those line items. In fact, changes in add-ons might also drive architectural changes and as a result, licensing, which might not be covered by the license price increase clause. Perform a risk analysis of each line item and assess if there might be any charges that might not be covered by the license price increase clause.

9. License Fee Waived Off First Year

When a vendor offers to “waive off” the license fee for the first year, it means they are willing to provide the ERP software to the customer for the initial year without charging the regular annual licensing fee. This offer is often made to ensure that customers only pay when they use the software in production. During the test phase, the cost for the ERP vendor is relatively low as the test infrastructure or the cloud instance is likely to be on inferior infrastructure and some vendors are willing to do that to ensure that the customers are not paying twice as they are likely to still pay for their old software while they implement and test the new one.

However, it’s crucial to understand that while waiving the license fee for the first year can be financially beneficial in the short term, it may impact the overall cost of the ERP solution over the long term. To evaluate the true cost-effectiveness of this arrangement, it is advisable to create a comprehensive cost schedule that takes into account all costs associated with the ERP implementation over a more extended period, such as 5 to 10 years.

10. Financing Options

Many ERP vendors may collaborate with third-party financial institutions to offer this option to their clients. However, it’s crucial to understand that ERP vendors often use this financing option as a negotiation tool to gain leverage on other ERP contract terms. They might expect concessions in other areas, such as customization, support, or pricing, in exchange for offering financing. Therefore, businesses should carefully assess whether this financing option aligns with their needs and objectives.

Suppose the financing option is not directly relevant to your situation, or you have access to other external funding sources. In that case, it may be wiser to concentrate on the contractual clauses likely to impact your overall cost structure significantly. Ultimately, the decision to utilize the financing option should be based on a thorough evaluation of your financial circumstances and the specific conditions outlined in the ERP contract. By doing so, you can ensure that you make informed choices that are in the best interest of your organization’s ERP implementation project.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

11. User Limit by Version

Your current edition and version may restrict the number of users that you can have on that version. If you outgrow that, then you need to switch to the next version, which might be more expensive than the smaller version. It’s crucial to understand your current version and edition to determine how this will impact your future pricing. Additionally, ensure that the price lock remains applicable if you switch versions or editions.

12. Transaction Restrictions

Similar to user limits, your current edition may also have transaction restrictions. Upon reaching these limits, you may be required to upgrade to a higher, more costly tier. It’s worth noting that the nature of transactions can vary substantially across industries. For industries with low-value transactions, such as retail, these restrictions can be particularly important during contract negotiations. Be sure to assess the implications of transaction limits.

13. Infrastructure Price Changes

Similar to third-party add-ons, ERP vendors may have limited control over the underlying infrastructure. Furthermore, claims of unlimited users may come with unexpressed restrictions. It’s essential to comprehend any imposed limitations to enable an unlimited model fully. These limits could pertain to storage, bandwidth, speed, infrastructure, and additional charges for add-ons. In some cases, these charges might surpass the licensing costs.

14. Application User Pricing

Pricing for application users or connectors may deviate from the pricing structure for named users. Familiarize yourself with the pricing variables, such as the number of transactions, API calls, queue messages, and other factors. Typically, these users need higher technical expertise to estimate transaction volumes accurately.

15. Third-Party Products and Warranties

ERP contracts are similar to complex bills of materials involving various dependencies, white-labeled add-ons, and products owned by third parties. Scrutinize the contracts and request the vendor to clearly specify the software products where warranty coverage may depend on their relationships with the vendors. Identify all the connections between the software providers and their vendors and how these relationships are established. Assess the potential consequences of losing these relationships and understand the warranties, especially in the context of pass-through warranties.

16. Ownership of Custom Code and Intellectual Property

Resellers or Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) may customize the software for you but might not grant access to the code, limiting your ability to seek support in the future. If a reseller or ISV plans to utilize any intellectual property (IP), ensure the contract includes provisions specifying ownership.

17. Data Ownership

Each ERP vendor may have distinct policies regarding data ownership. Thoroughly review the contract provisions to understand the format in which data will be provided and the duration for data access or deletion in the event of contract termination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ERP contracts require expertise to uncover financial risks that might not be as obvious to a layperson. By understanding these ERP contract terms, you will be empowered to negotiate and minimize financial risks. Remember, ERP selection is only the beginning; managing change and ensuring the terms of your contract align with your business goals are ongoing processes. Having a knowledgeable ally by your side, one who keeps abreast of industry developments can be invaluable. So, as you embark on your ERP journey, don’t take ERP contracts lightly as they might fire back in ways you wouldn’t expect. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Why is it important to consider the potential escalation of software license costs in ERP contracts?

Considering the potential escalation of software license costs is vital because ERP vendors may significantly raise licensing fees upon renewal. Without a License Price Increase clause, organizations can be caught off guard by unexpected financial burdens. This clause safeguards against such scenarios, specifying the terms and conditions under which the ERP vendor can increase license fees upon renewal.

Why is the consideration of financing options significant in ERP contracts, and what factors should organizations keep in mind when evaluating these options?

Financing options can be a valuable way to manage the costs of ERP implementation, but organizations must assess their relevance. ERP vendors may use financing as a negotiation tool, so it’s crucial to weigh potential concessions in other contract areas. When evaluating financing options, consider whether they align with your organization’s needs and objectives, accounting for the specific conditions outlined in the ERP contract to make informed decisions.

What is the significance of understanding editions and modules in ERP contracts?

Understanding editions and modules in ERP contracts is crucial because they affect pricing and discounts offered by software vendors. ERP software often comes in different editions with slight variations or additional features, and these can impact the cost. It’s essential to assess these variations to access the best discounts and ensure that your chosen edition aligns with your business needs.

Top 6 Cloud ERP vs On-Premise ERP Differences

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / January 1, 2024 March 17, 2025

In today’s evolving business landscape, ERP systems play an important role in streamlining operations, enhancing efficiency, and providing real-time insights to support decision-making. When it comes to ERP implementation, businesses often face a crucial decision: choosing between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP. Each option has its unique advantages and drawbacks, and the choice largely depends on your organization’s specific needs and objectives. Therefore, here are six criteria that might help you choose between the two:

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Top 6 Cloud ERP vs On-Premise ERP Differences

1. Contractual Model

One of the fundamental differences when choosing between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP lies in their contractual models. Cloud ERP typically operates under a subscription services agreement, often referred to as software as a service (SaaS). This means that when you opt for a cloud ERP solution, you essentially enter into a recurring fee arrangement. Much like a monthly or annual subscription, you pay for access to the software for a predetermined period. This subscription-based model offers businesses a pay-as-you-go approach, allowing them to access the ERP system without needing a substantial upfront investment.

On the other hand, the contractual model for on-premise ERP follows a different path. It involves a one-time license fee for purchasing the software. In addition to the upfront licensing cost, businesses need to budget for periodic maintenance and support fees to ensure the software remains updated and well-supported. Unlike the cloud ERP’s subscription-based approach, on-premise ERP necessitates a significant initial investment in the license fee. This cost model often results in higher upfront expenses, making it crucial for organizations to weigh the benefits of perpetual ownership against the immediate financial implications. Therefore, the choice between these two contractual models represents a fundamental decision point in ERP selection, heavily influenced by the organization’s financial capacity, long-term strategy, and budgeting preferences.

2. Fee Structure

When it comes to cloud ERP, businesses must pay a periodic subscription fee. This fee grants them access to the ERP software for a specific duration, much like a monthly or annual subscription to an online service. This subscription model provides a high degree of flexibility and scalability, making it a compelling option for organizations seeking to effectively manage their expenditures while maintaining the capacity to adapt to evolving business requirements. Cloud ERP’s subscription-based fee structure offers the advantage of pay-as-you-go, allowing businesses to pay for what they use and adjust their subscription as their needs change. This financial agility is particularly appealing to smaller enterprises and those operating in dynamic environments where the ability to scale resources up or down is a critical requirement.

In contrast, the fee structure for on-premise ERP significantly diverges from cloud-based counterparts. When opting for an on-premise ERP system, an organization must make a one-time payment as a license fee to acquire the software. This initial license fee can be a substantial upfront investment. However, this is not the end of the financial commitment. Ongoing maintenance and support fees are obligatory to ensure the software remains up-to-date, well-supported, and compliant with changing regulations and business requirements. These fees are recurrent and necessary to keep the software functioning optimally. While the up-front license fee grants perpetual ownership of the software, these additional recurring costs are crucial for maintaining the efficiency, security, and functionality of the on-premise ERP system.

This fee structure reflects a different approach to financial investment, emphasizing a one-time capital outlay followed by recurring operational expenses. This approach might be more suitable for larger enterprises with the capacity to invest significantly upfront and maintain dedicated IT staff to manage the system.

3. Rights

Cloud ERP operates under a subscription model, meaning that your organization essentially rents the software for the subscription period. This arrangement offers flexibility, allowing businesses to scale their usage up or down as needed, and it provides a sense of agility. However, it’s crucial to understand that your right to access and use the software is contingent on the continuation of your subscription. Once the subscription period ends, so does your access. This can be a double-edged sword, as it provides adaptability but also means ongoing costs.

On the other hand, on-premise ERP takes a different approach by offering a perpetual license. This means that, upon purchase, your organization secures the right to use the software indefinitely. This can particularly appeal to businesses looking for a long-term, one-time investment. It essentially grants you ownership of the software, providing a sense of control and independence. However, it’s important to note that this perpetual license doesn’t necessarily cover ongoing support and maintenance, which typically come with additional costs. The choice between these models hinges on your organization’s specific needs and long-term objectives. Cloud ERP’s subscription model suits those seeking flexibility and scalability, while on-premise ERP’s perpetual license is favored by those aiming for a lasting investment with full control over the software.

4. Hosting Model

The hosting model in the cloud ERP versus on-premise ERP comparison defines the ownership and management of the enterprise architecture where your ERP system resides. In the case of cloud ERP, the hosting responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of the ERP vendor. This means the vendor sets up, maintains, and manages the servers and the underlying infrastructure required for the ERP system to function. They are also responsible for ensuring the system runs smoothly and any technical issues or updates are addressed promptly. This hands-off approach can appeal to businesses as it relieves them of the burden of managing IT infrastructure, which can be resource-intensive.

In contrast, on-premise ERP shifts the hosting responsibility to the customer. When an organization opts for an on-premise solution, they need to invest in and maintain their own servers and IT infrastructure to house the ERP system. This entails purchasing the necessary hardware, setting up data centers or server rooms, and having IT personnel oversee the ongoing enterprise architecture maintenance and support. While this approach provides greater control and privacy over data, it also requires a significant upfront investment and ongoing operational costs. It’s important to carefully assess your organization’s IT capabilities and resources when considering the hosting model, as it can substantially impact the long-term management of your ERP system.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

5. Application Backup And Redundancy

Data backup and redundancy are fundamental to any robust ERP system, ensuring business continuity and data integrity. When it comes to cloud ERP, these aspects are typically handled by the vendor, relieving the user’s burden. The vendor implements automated data backup processes, regularly copying and storing your data in secure, off-site locations. This meticulous approach minimizes the risk of data loss in case of unexpected events, such as hardware failures, natural disasters, or cyberattacks. In essence, your data is well-protected and can be swiftly restored, reducing downtime and potential financial losses.

Conversely, with on-premise ERP, your organization is responsible for application backup and redundancy. This entails investing in backup solutions, establishing comprehensive project recovery plans, and maintaining the necessary infrastructure to safeguard your data. While this approach grants you greater control over your data’s security and recovery processes, it requires substantial resources, including IT expertise and budget allocation. Failing to adequately address these aspects can result in prolonged system downtime and potential data loss, making it critical for on-premise ERP users to proactively manage their data backup and redundancy solutions to maintain business continuity.

6. Software Source Code Modifications

Customization significantly tailors an ERP system to align with a business’s specific needs and processes. The customization differs significantly in the context of cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP. Cloud ERP solutions typically limit the extent of customization permitted by the vendor. While you may have some flexibility to configure settings, make minor adjustments, and personalize certain aspects of the system, extensive modifications to the software’s source code are generally restricted in cloud-based systems. This limitation is mainly in place to maintain system stability and ensure that customizations don’t interfere with the software’s core functionality. Cloud ERP providers aim to provide standardized, easily maintainable solutions that cater to a broad range of businesses, so they often limit deep-level source code alterations.

Conversely, on-premise ERP software offers a more significant degree of flexibility when it comes to software source code modifications. Businesses can often negotiate with the ERP vendor to make changes customizations, or fine-tune the source code to align more closely with their highly specialized or unique requirements. This extensive customization ability is a major advantage for businesses with intricate processes or specific industry demands. With on-premise ERP, you have greater control over the software’s underlying code, allowing you to create a more tailored solution. However, it’s essential to recognize that this level of customization may require a skilled IT team and lead to higher ERP implementation and maintenance costs, as well as the need for more significant oversight to ensure that the system remains stable and secure.

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP depends on your organization’s specific needs, budget, and IT infrastructure capabilities. Cloud ERP offers flexibility, scalability, and hands-off management, making it suitable for businesses looking to streamline operations quickly. On the other hand, on-premise ERP provides a long-term investment with greater control over customization and data management.

Carefully assessing your business requirements and considering the factors mentioned above will help you make an informed decision and choose the ERP solution that aligns with your objectives and growth plans. Ultimately, both options have their strengths, and the right choice is the one that best serves your unique business needs. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

What is the fundamental difference between cloud ERP and on-premise ERP regarding their contractual models?

The fundamental difference is in their contractual models. Cloud ERP operates under a subscription agreement, where you pay recurring fees for access. This subscription model is akin to a monthly or annual fee, providing flexibility and scalability. On the other hand, on-premise ERP involves a one-time license fee for software purchases, with additional periodic maintenance and support fees. It’s a substantial upfront investment, and this model might be more suitable for organizations with a long-term outlook and financial capacity.

What advantages does the fee structure of cloud ERP offer to businesses?

Cloud ERP uses a periodic subscription fee structure, which provides businesses with flexibility and scalability. They can pay for what they use and adapt their subscriptions to changing needs. This model suits smaller enterprises and dynamic environments where the ability to scale resources up or down is essential. It’s a pay-as-you-go approach that helps manage costs effectively.

How does the hosting model differ between cloud ERP and on-premise ERP?

Cloud ERP places the hosting responsibility on the vendor, meaning they manage the infrastructure and servers. On the contrary, on-premise ERP shifts the hosting responsibility to the customer. Organizations opting for on-premise solutions must invest in and maintain their own IT infrastructure. While this provides greater control, it requires a significant upfront investment and ongoing operational costs. The choice depends on your IT capabilities and resources.

Top 10 TMS Systems In 2025

Leave a Comment / Blog, Distribution, Enterprise Architecture, Food and Beverage, Retail / By Sam Gupta / December 27, 2023 June 7, 2025

A Transportation Management System (TMS) is crucial in logistics and 3PL. However, its definition often depends on the context. For many transportation providers and third-party logistics firms, a TMS acts as their ERP—handling up to 90% of daily operations. Traditionally, these platforms lacked built-in accounting features, requiring external integration with systems like Sage or Microsoft GP. However, the emergence of cloud-based, end-to-end TMS solutions has changed this dynamic. These newer platforms often include native accounting capabilities, which, while convenient, add layers of complexity when selecting the right solution.

TMS systems span a broad spectrum of use cases. Some are built as operational platforms for logistics consulting firms managing transportation on behalf of clients. Others are directly impacted by internal dynamics—particularly when the vendor also manages a carrier network. In such cases, political and competitive factors can affect carrier participation, which may skew rating algorithms and compromise the objectivity of AI- or ML-driven insights. This has led to a growing concern in the industry over the “independence” of a TMS. An independent TMS provider offers pure-play technology without engaging in freight execution, aiming for neutrality in algorithmic decision-making and network participation.

That said, not all independent TMS providers steer clear of operating their own carrier networks. Some maintain these networks to simplify onboarding processes and enhance access to key data streams, such as real-time tracking, ETAs, and exception alerts. Furthermore, TMS systems differ not just in their independence but also in their transportation mode support and geographic coverage. Understanding these distinctions is vital for businesses looking to align TMS functionality with their operational scale, geographic footprint, and digital maturity.

10. CH Robinson/Navisphere TMS

Navisphere, the TMS platform developed by CH Robinson, offers a unique blend of transportation management technology and logistics expertise. Its value is most pronounced for companies seeking an all-in-one solution that combines multi-modal transportation support with managed services. Navisphere is especially strong in the food and produce sectors. It helps shippers tap into CH Robinson’s large carrier network, consolidate freight, and access volume-based discounts. The platform suits businesses that want to streamline transportation using one provider for both software and hands-on supply chain services.

Navisphere’s strength in integrated logistics can also be a drawback. It may not suit organizations that value independence and flexibility in a TMS. Companies working with multiple vendors or needing broader third-party integrations may find it too limiting. The platform ties closely to CH Robinson’s proprietary network. Additionally, the perceived conflict of interest in CH Robinson’s pricing algorithms and limited network scope may raise concerns for some. Is Navisphere the right fit for your transportation strategy? Or would a more independent, scalable TMS better serve your growing network needs? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to compare Navisphere with the leading solutions in the market.

Top 15 Retail Digital Transformation Trends in 2025

9. Trimble TMS

Trimble is a feature-rich TMS platform built specifically for the needs of trucking companies and 3PLs with internal fleets. Its strengths lie in advanced driver compliance, telematics integration, and load planning—making it a compelling choice for businesses whose core operations revolve around freight movement. With pre-built compliance workflows and deep domain expertise, Trimble significantly reduces administrative overhead while enhancing operational visibility. Fleet managers can rely on Trimble’s mapping and dispatch tools to streamline scheduling, ensure regulatory compliance, and monitor fleet performance in real time.

Trimble focuses heavily on the transportation sector. Its benefits closely tie to that niche. This focus can limit its relevance for retail, distribution, or manufacturing companies that need broader, cloud-native TMS capabilities. The platform’s reliance on legacy technology and its managed-service model may also pose scalability and independence challenges for some businesses. Is Trimble the right fit for your logistics operations, or would a more flexible, cloud-first TMS better align with your long-term strategy? Are you prioritizing trucking-specific compliance or cross-industry adaptability? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to explore how Trimble compares to other leading platforms and find the solution best suited to your business.

8. Descartes TMS

Descartes stands out as a powerful TMS platform for enterprises managing complex, international, and multi-modal supply chains. With capabilities tailored to regulatory compliance, visibility, and international logistics data analytics, Descartes is a best-of-breed solution for global organizations that need more than just basic transportation planning. Its portfolio includes not only an enterprise-grade TMS but also a separate platform designed for trucking companies and 3PL providers, giving it flexibility to serve both large and niche market segments effectively.

However, Descartes may not be the ideal fit for every business. Its reliance on managed services could limit the level of independence some companies expect from their TMS provider. Additionally, smaller businesses might find Descartes cost-prohibitive and may prefer more affordable, all-in-one solutions. And since Descartes focuses purely on transportation, companies may need to integrate it with external systems like WMS or S&OP tools to achieve full supply chain orchestration. Does your organization need a specialized TMS for global multi-modal logistics, or are you looking for a more integrated, suite-based platform? Are managed services a benefit—or a barrier—for your team’s control and visibility? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to explore how Descartes compares to other top solutions.

7. Korber/MercuryGate

MercuryGate’s developers tailored this cloud-native TMS platform for SMBs ready to move beyond basic shipping tools like Pacejet or ShipStation. Its modern architecture and intuitive interface make it especially appealing to direct-to-consumer (DTC) and consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies looking for a scalable solution that aligns with cloud-first ERP systems like NetSuite or Acumatica. With capabilities in fleet management, claims processing, and last-mile logistics, MercuryGate provides a solid foundation for smaller businesses that want more control and visibility without the complexity of a large enterprise platform.

Now part of the Körber supply chain portfolio, MercuryGate has the potential to evolve into a more comprehensive solution. However, as it currently stands, its limited international reach, lack of pre-integrated WMS/S&OP features, and basic reporting tools could hinder adoption by larger or more global operations. Will MercuryGate’s roadmap align with your company’s growing complexity? Do its North American strengths match your geographic footprint, or will you need a platform with more global reach? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to compare MercuryGate with the leading TMS platforms.

6. 3Gtms TMS (Pacejet)

3Gtms is purpose-built for SMB trucking companies looking for an all-in-one TMS that supports LTL, FTL, and parcel shipments. Its recent acquisition of Pacejet has extended its reach into the parcel space, making it a compelling choice for domestic shippers seeking a cost-effective and comprehensive transportation management solution. With advanced dispatch and load planning features, 3Gtms especially suits businesses running lighter, less complex shipping operations—particularly those working within ERP ecosystems like Acumatica or Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine).

However, 3Gtms may not be the right fit for companies with international operations or those needing enterprise-grade scalability. It lacks the fully integrated suite of solutions that larger, cloud-native platforms provide, and some advanced capabilities may require third-party add-ons. Is your business focused on domestic transportation with moderate complexity, or are you gearing up for global expansion? Are you willing to sacrifice integrated suite functionality for a more targeted and streamlined TMS experience? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to see how 3Gtms compares to the top platforms and discover which TMS best fits your business goals.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

5. e2open (BlueJays/Cloud Logistics)

e2open stands out as one of the most robust and integrated supply chain platforms available, combining execution, planning, and collaboration across global networks. Tailored for large enterprises, particularly those operating on SAP or Oracle, it offers powerful forecasting tools enhanced by AI and ML, enabling smarter, more agile decision-making across complex supply chains. With coverage of all major transportation modes—road, rail, ocean, and air—e2open is particularly effective for companies that rely on close collaboration with suppliers, distributors, and logistics partners worldwide.

However, e2open’s depth and scale come with trade-offs. Its complexity may overwhelm smaller companies, and its recent integration into the WiseTech Global ecosystem—alongside Bloom Global—raises questions about its long-term neutrality. For enterprises, this acquisition may prove synergistic, but others might view it as a potential limitation. Is your organization ready for a platform with such scale and depth? Do you prioritize a unified planning-execution platform, or would a more focused TMS better serve your needs? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to compare e2open with other leading platforms.

4. Manhattan Associates

Manhattan is best known for its industry-leading WMS, but its integrated TMS capabilities make it an attractive choice for enterprises operating in retail-heavy sectors such as grocery, footwear, and apparel. For businesses already leveraging Manhattan’s WMS, adding its TMS functionality can streamline operations, reduce integration costs, and support high-volume, store-based fulfillment strategies. The native interoperability between warehouse and transportation systems enables synchronized inventory and shipping workflows—particularly valuable for companies handling complex last-mile logistics.

However, Manhattan’s TMS offering is more of an add-on than a core focus, and it may not match the depth of best-of-breed TMS platforms. Additionally, developers designed the suite for large enterprises, which may overwhelm or be too costly for SMBs. Is your organization already using the Manhattan ecosystem and looking to strengthen WMS-TMS integration? Or would a standalone TMS with stronger transportation capabilities suit you better? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to explore how Manhattan stacks up against other leading platforms.

3. SAP Transportation Management

SAP Transportation Management (SAP TM) is purpose-built for enterprises already invested in the SAP ecosystem, especially those using SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM) or SAP S/4HANA. Its value lies in native integration across SAP’s broader supply chain and finance solutions, enabling centralized visibility, compliance, and transaction traceability—particularly beneficial for global companies and distributors with complex logistics requirements. SAP TM is a compelling choice for organizations with sophisticated workflows, such as 3PL providers managing multi-party billing and large-scale freight operations.

That said, SAP TM can be too intricate and costly for SMBs or companies not deeply embedded in SAP technologies. Additionally, core transportation capabilities like carrier communication may require third-party tools such as Descartes, adding complexity and expense. Are you already using SAP and looking to extend functionality with a natively integrated TMS? Or is your business better served by a platform that offers standalone TMS depth with a lighter IT footprint? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to see how SAP TM compares.

2. Blue Yonder

Blue Yonder is a powerhouse in the transportation management space, offering an execution-focused TMS deeply embedded within one of the most comprehensive supply chain suites on the market. Its strength lies in serving enterprise clients—especially those in retail—with robust capabilities for global freight management, integrated planning, and execution. Unlike e2open, which builds around its own proprietary network, Blue Yonder leverages data partnerships to enhance its control tower and end-to-end visibility features, making it ideal for enterprises aiming to streamline complex, global supply chains.

However, Blue Yonder may not be the right fit for every business. SMBs or companies simply looking for a standalone TMS might find its suite excessive—both in cost and scope. Is your business prepared for a highly integrated system that covers both planning and execution? Or would a leaner, more focused TMS platform better suit your needs? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to explore how Blue Yonder compares to other top contenders.

1. Oracle TMS

Oracle TMS stands out as a premier choice for large enterprises already invested in Oracle’s broader ecosystem, including ERP, RMS, and WMS. The platform’s developers built its transportation management capabilities for enterprise scalability, especially for industries like retail, distribution, and logistics where compliance, traceability, and tight financial system integration are critical. With native connectivity across the Oracle suite, businesses can expect streamlined data flows, enhanced operational visibility, and centralized control across supply chain functions.

That said, Oracle TMS may not suit every organization. Its high cost, complexity, and deep integration requirements make it better suited for companies with mature IT infrastructures and advanced global logistics needs. Are you an enterprise with demanding regulatory obligations and a need for full-suite integration? Or are you seeking a simpler, more agile TMS platform that can operate independently? Download the Ultimate Top 10 TMS Systems Report now to compare Oracle with other top platforms.

Conclusion

Much like other enterprise software categories, TMS systems come in various configurations. The suitability of a TMS system for a business largely depends on how it aligns with the enterprise architecture and business model.

If you’re considering a TMS system, it’s crucial to distinguish between systems provided by consulting firms and those by pure-play technology firms. Delve into your business model and enterprise architecture to evaluate which system aligns best with your needs. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with Independent TMS consultants.

Download the Full Report

FAQs

Which is the best TMS system?

Every TMS solution is crafted for a distinct purpose, industry, and transaction volume. What suits one company may not be the ideal fit for another. The key to finding the right TMS solution is conducting a comprehensive analysis of your specific needs and selecting a system tailored to your industry and transaction volume.

If a TMS system is not included in this list, should companies consider that as a potential solution?

Yes, most certainly. This list has used a specific criterion to make these recommendations. Just because a solution is not listed here doesn’t mean it might not be a great fit for you. Rather than making a decision purely based on rankings, read the fine print of the criteria and align that with your critical needs.

What implications should companies know about the factor of independence among TMS systems?

The factor of independence might matter if you are concerned that the publisher of the TMS system competes with their own network. Some carriers may not choose to participate because of this factor, and their rates might be potentially cheaper or more favorable than the most attractive quote available in the non-independent ecosystem.

Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams

Leave a Comment / Blog, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / December 25, 2023 March 17, 2025

If you can build the consensus as part of your ERP projects, your ERP implementation will likely be successful. Building consensus is always the first challenge. Since ERP implementations involve various teams and stakeholders, the challenges associated with it are multifaceted if everybody is not on the same page. What consensus does not usually represent is when decision-making in the organization is very centralized and is not spread across the departments.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

If a broad consensus does not exist among the leadership team, the management team, and even the process owners, it can make the ERP project fall apart if the controller walks out of it in the middle of the project. It can be a nightmare. Therefore, in this blog, we will explore the top 10 strategies to build consensus among ERP teams.

Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams

1. Establishing Clear Goals and Objectives

The ERP implementation process should always begin with setting crystal-clear objectives and goals. Keeping the goals straightforward and comprehensive cannot be stressed enough. For example, if your existing ERP system is outdated and you wish to upgrade to the latest technology, this simple and high-level goal can be the guiding light for the entire team. These goals act as a foundation upon which the strategies and actions are built, ensuring that everyone is moving in the same direction.

A balanced approach, in this case, always works to establish clear goals and objectives. Simply asking team members, “What do you want to do?” might lead to uncertainty and vague responses. Therefore, providing a framework or structure for these goals, and then seeking input and feedback from team members, can be highly effective. By offering guidelines and allowing team members to have their say within a defined framework, you strike a balance between giving them a sense of involvement and providing a structured direction.

2. Leadership Commitment and Engagement

Effective ERP implementation requires leadership that leads by example. When leaders are actively engaged and committed to the project, their enthusiasm becomes contagious. Their involvement sets the tone for the entire team, demonstrating the importance of the ERP project. In essence, they act as cheerleaders, rallying the troops and showing that they believe in the project’s potential. Leadership commitment is essential not only to encourage the team but also to convey the message that this ERP implementation is a top priority for the organization. When team members see that leaders are dedicated, they are more likely to follow suit, building consensus around the project’s significance.

3. Effective Communication and Transparency

Open and transparent communication is the lifeblood of any successful ERP project. Clear communication channels ensure team members are on the same page and aware of project developments. Transparency fosters trust, as team members feel informed and included in the decision-making process. It also helps in addressing concerns early, preventing any misalignments or misunderstandings from derailing the project.

Effective communication generally includes regular team meetings, progress updates, and a willingness to listen to team members’ feedback and concerns. Moreover, providing straightforward answers to questions and being candid about potential challenges and roadblocks will further enhance the team’s understanding and willingness to support the project.

4. Inclusive Team Collaboration

ERP implementations often involve various teams and departments within an organization. To build consensus, it’s essential to foster inclusive team collaboration. This means breaking down silos and encouraging different functional teams to work together. By involving all relevant departments, you can ensure that no critical perspectives or needs are overlooked. Cross-functional collaboration also instills a sense of ownership within the team as they collectively contribute to shaping the ERP system.

In practice, you can create interdisciplinary teams that consist of members from different departments who work together to understand and address the unique requirements of their respective functions. This approach encourages a collaborative spirit and ensures that all voices are heard. When everyone has a say in how the ERP system will work for their department, it paves the way for stronger consensus and alignment across the organization.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

5. Identifying and Addressing Stakeholder Concerns

ERP implementations can be a source of uncertainty and apprehension for many stakeholders. It’s crucial to identify and address their concerns proactively. The hesitation to embrace change is a common issue, and it’s vital to understand these concerns. Open dialogue is the key to resolving these doubts and gaining consensus.

Stakeholder concerns can vary widely, from fears of job displacement to worries about workflow disruption. A crucial step is to engage with stakeholders directly, listen to their worries, and provide clear and honest responses. When their concerns are acknowledged and addressed, it can go a long way in building their trust and consensus in the ERP project. In addition to formal channels, informal conversations and feedback mechanisms should be established, ensuring that no issue remains unaddressed. By recognizing and dealing with these concerns, the ERP team can create a supportive environment that facilitates consensus-building.

6. Early User Involvement

End-users are the backbone of any ERP system. Their involvement should start from the project’s inception. It’s common for teams to claim that they understand the ERP system’s implications and are ready for implementation, but the actual testing reveals otherwise. To avoid such situations, engage end-users from the beginning.

Incorporating end-users in the initial stages allows them to take ownership of the project. Their hands-on insights are invaluable for tailoring the ERP system to meet their specific needs. Additionally, early involvement helps prevent surprises during testing and rollout, as issues are identified and resolved beforehand. When end-users have a say in shaping the system that will impact their daily work, they are more likely to embrace it enthusiastically.

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

Download Now

7. Training and Skill Development

An ERP system is only as effective as the team using it. Providing comprehensive training and skill development programs is crucial for team members to navigate the system with confidence. Training should be an ongoing process, adapting to the evolving needs of the team and the ERP system itself.

Training ensures that team members are not only capable of using the ERP system but are also proficient in doing so. Proper training results in a smoother transition during system adoption and reduces the likelihood of errors or inefficiencies. Additionally, ongoing skill development keeps the team updated on new features and functionalities, maximizing the system’s potential and ensuring long-term consensus.

8. Change Management

Change is a natural part of any ERP implementation. Effective change management involves guiding teams through this transition period. The lack of change management can lead to confusion and resistance, which can hinder consensus.

A structured change management approach helps the team adapt to new processes and procedures with minimal disruption. It includes communicating the reasons for the changes, addressing concerns, and involving team members in the change process. Successful change management not only aids in building consensus but also streamlines the ERP implementation journey.

9. Recognizing And Addressing Red Flags

The ability to recognize early warning signs of resistance or misalignment within the ERP team is critical. The failure to identify and address red flags can lead to project delays and increased costs.

These red flags may include resistance to change, disputes over system functionalities, or a lack of engagement during team meetings. The key is to remain vigilant and address these issues promptly. Whether it’s by offering additional support, clarifying project goals, or revisiting training sessions, early intervention is crucial for maintaining consensus and ensuring a successful ERP implementation.

10. Building Consensus With Executives

While building consensus among team members is essential, it’s equally crucial to gain the support and alignment of executives. Some executives may not fully comprehend the operational intricacies of ERP implementations. Therefore, strategies are needed to ensure that executives are well-informed and engaged in the project.

Building consensus with executives involves providing them with a clear understanding of the project’s objectives, benefits, and potential challenges. It also entails keeping them actively involved in decision-making and ensuring that their expectations align with the project’s realities. When executives and team members share a common understanding and commitment to the ERP project, consensus is more likely to be achieved.

Conclusion

In conclusion, building consensus among ERP teams is a multifaceted process that involves clear objectives, strong leadership, transparent communication, and inclusive collaboration. Identifying and addressing stakeholder concerns, early user involvement, and comprehensive training are essential components of this journey. Effective change management and the ability to recognize red flags ensure that consensus is maintained throughout the project.

Building consensus with executives adds another layer of alignment. By implementing these strategies, ERP teams can navigate the challenges and complexities of ERP projects while achieving successful outcomes. Consensus within the team paves the way for a seamless ERP implementation and empowers organizations to leverage their systems effectively.

FAQs

Why is it essential to establish clear goals and objectives for ERP implementation?

Clear goals and objectives serve as the foundation for any successful ERP implementation. These goals provide a shared vision that guides the entire team, ensuring everyone is moving in the same direction. With straightforward and comprehensive objectives, team members understand the purpose of the ERP project, which is crucial for building consensus. It’s like setting a course for a successful voyage – without it, the team may drift off course and face challenges in achieving their desired outcomes.

How does involving end-users from the beginning help in building consensus?

Involving end-users at an early stage of the ERP project is critical for multiple reasons. When end-users take part from the project’s inception, they develop a sense of ownership, leading to a higher level of commitment. Their hands-on insights and feedback are invaluable in tailoring the ERP system to meet their specific needs. Furthermore, early user involvement helps prevent surprises during testing and rollout by identifying and addressing issues beforehand.

Why is recognizing and addressing red flags essential during an ERP implementation?

Recognizing and addressing red flags is crucial because it helps prevent project delays and increased costs. These red flags, such as resistance to change or disputes over system functionalities, can hinder consensus within the ERP team. Early identification allows for prompt intervention, whether through additional support, clarification of project goals, or revisiting training sessions. By addressing these issues promptly, consensus is maintained, and the ERP project is more likely to succeed.

Top 10 WMS Systems In 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Sam Gupta / October 2, 2023 March 9, 2024

Traditionally, ERP systems lacked WMS capabilities due to technological and architectural differences. However, with the advent of cloud technology, modern systems now include basic WMS features for mid-market users, eliminating concerns about complex integration or the need for a separate WMS package. Nevertheless, companies, even with simpler operations, often outgrow these basic capabilities and find the need for best-of-breed WMS software.

Once you reach this stage, the next step is to identify the most suitable best-of-breed WMS software. A crucial consideration emerges for companies with a 3PL focus, even if it constitutes a minor component of their business model. As distributors seek diversification, many explore 3PL offerings, leading to a warehouse architecture distinct from the traditional approach closely tied to inventory accounting. Moreover, the requirements for accelerated transactions and round-the-clock operations highlight the essential need for a dedicated warehouse management system.

With technological advancements, warehouse architecture has undergone significant evolution, comprising three key components: the warehouse management system (WMS), warehouse execution system (WES), and warehouse control system (WCS). The control system’s role is to transmit commands, facilitate integration with hardware, and ensure smooth coordination. The warehouse management system primarily handles data and inventory management, while the execution component unifies these functions. WMS solutions may offer some or all of these capabilities, often bundled with additional systems in their suite. Now, let’s explore the top 10 WMS systems in 2024.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Criteria

Overall market share/# of customers. How large is the market share of this WMS product? WMS vendors‘ overall market share is irrelevant for this list if they have multiple WMS products in their portfolio.
Ownership/funding. Who owns the WMS vendor? Is it a private equity company, a family or a group of families, or a wealthy corporate investor?
Quality of development (legacy vs. legacy dressed as modern vs. modern UX/cloud-native). How modern is the tech stack? Not clunky! How aggressively is the WMS vendor pushing cloud-native functionality for this product? No fake clouds! Is the roadmap officially announced? Or uncertain?
Community/Ecosystem. How vibrant is the community? Social media groups? In-person user groups? Forums?
Depth of native functionality (for specific industries). Last-mile functionality for specific industries natively built into the product?
Quality of publicly available product documentation. How well-documented is the product? Is the documentation available publicly? How updated is the demo content available on YouTube?
Product share and documented commitment (of the publisher through financial statements). Is the product share reported separately in financial statements if the WMS vendor is public?
Acquisition strategy aligned with the product. Are there any recent acquisitions to fill a specific hole with this product? Are there any official announcements to integrate recently acquired capabilities?
Maturity of the Supply Chain Suite. How mature are other capabilities that would augment WMS, such as TMS, WMS, S&OP, and the network?
User Reviews. How specific are the reviews about this product’s capabilities? How recent and frequent are the reviews?
Must be a WMS product. Must be a recognized WMS product by several analyst firms with a proven track record and market share.

10. Tecsys

Tecsys specializes in serving healthcare and retail sectors, offering unique capabilities tailored to specific verticals, particularly in point-of-use inventory management. While many WMS vendors may include hardware or have partnerships for devices and ASRS systems, Tecsys stands out with its focus on specialized hardware and interfaces crucial for point-of-use systems, which could be costly to develop on generic WMS platforms.

These sectors also benefit from Tecsys’ robust multi-location inventory features, facilitating seamless goods transfer across various locations. Opt for Tecsys if you’re a mid-market healthcare or retail organization, especially if you have distinct needs they uniquely address.

Pros

Point-of-use inventory management, with specialized hardware and interfaces, is crucial for traceability.
Multi-location Capabilities are suitable for facilities with diverse locations, such as hospitals or retail businesses.
eCommerce and retail-friendly with an integrated Order Management System (OMS), catering to budget-conscious mid-market Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) and e-commerce-centric companies.

Cons

Outdated technology compared to some modern cloud-native options.
Not a comprehensive suite like larger players such as Blue Yonder and Manhattan, lacking a full supply chain suite.
Limited ecosystem and consulting options compared to other alternatives on the list.

9. Mobe3 WMS

Mobe3 WMS is among the more compact solutions featured on this list, commonly integrated into smaller ERP ecosystems. Despite its size, it boasts rich features tailored to support the specific requirements of smaller warehouses, particularly in process and batch-centric industries.

These industries demand specialized capabilities, such as pallet and lot attributes, integrated into the solution. Opt for Mobe3 WMS if you are a small organization seeking a cost-effective and easily implementable WMS tool.

Pros

iOS-friendly and cloud-native, uniquely designed for iOS interfaces, making it one of the few cloud-native WMS systems.
Advanced capabilities for SMBs, including features like measuring picking metrics, surpassing expectations for its size.
Advanced capabilities for process and batch manufacturing, offering support for lot attributes, bin attributes, and pallet attributes crucial for advanced slotting and cross-docking.

Cons

Technology and compatibility issues with some devices require careful consideration of device compatibility.
Reports of software bugs from some users, indicating potential stability concerns compared to larger vendors.
Not suitable for enterprises, lacking the transaction processing capabilities required by larger organizations.

8. Logiwa WMS

Logiwa WMS is tailored for eCommerce and parcel-centric operations, excelling in various aspects of warehouse management, including WMS, WCS, and WES. While its capabilities are robust, they may not be as comprehensive as those offered by some other enterprise solutions featured on this list. Opt for Logiwa if you require a cloud-native, feature-rich WMS designed for mid-size warehouses with a focus on parcel-centric operations.

Pros

Ideal for eCommerce and parcel-centric operations, making it particularly well-suited for businesses in these sectors.
Feature-rich, offering advanced capabilities typically found in mid-size WMS systems, although not as advanced as some enterprise solutions.
Cloud-native UI/UX, providing an intuitive interface and user experience. Encompasses capabilities across WMS, WCS, and WES, including integration with ASRS systems and AGVs.

Cons

Learning curve, requiring users to adapt to the system, especially if they lack prior experience with WMS solutions.
Not as user-friendly as simpler WMS systems like Mobe3, necessitating training and implementation efforts.
Limited coverage for complex enterprise modes, primarily designed for parcel-centric operations, makes it less suitable for warehouses with diverse modes.

7. Softeon

Softeon caters to a customer base similar to Infor WMS, focusing on the upper mid-market segment. However, it lacks proven experience with enterprise customers compared to some other solutions on this list, and it might be too robust for smaller companies.

Consider Softeon if you are a mid-sized organization in search of an advanced WMS that not only offers additional capabilities like distributed order management but also supports crucial batch processing required for larger warehouse operations.

Pros

Robust batch capabilities, addressing the needs of mid-sized companies that have outgrown basic barcoding solutions.
Seamless integration with other solutions included in the suite, streamlining the connectivity between different components like distributed order management.
Distributed order management capabilities are beneficial for high-volume retail and distribution organizations managing complex transactions, including micro-fulfillment operations.

Cons

Not tailored for enterprise-scale operations. lacking a proven track record with larger companies.
Requires third-party add-ons for enterprises needing additional supply chain capabilities, making the suite less comprehensive than larger solutions like Blue Yonder or Manhattan.
May be too intricate for very small operations, with layers supporting batch processing potentially overwhelming for companies with minimal scale.

+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

Download Now

6. Infor WMS

Infor WMS is tailored for distributors in the upper mid-market segment, particularly prevalent in manufacturing industries, with a notable focus on verticals where solutions like Infor LN and M3 hold prominence. This is particularly applicable to sectors such as Automotive, Aerospace, Fashion, and Industrial distribution. If you are a mid-market manufacturer, especially considering or already utilizing Infor LN or M3 ERP systems, Infor WMS might be a suitable choice.

Pros

Seamless integration with other Infor ERPs. Infor WMS offers pre-integrated solutions with Infor LN and M3, addressing the inherent challenges of ERP-WMS integration, especially for manufacturers already leveraging these ERP systems.
Comprehensive supply chain capabilities. In addition to WMS, Infor WMS incorporates various supply chain offerings, including S&OP and visibility platforms, making it comparable to larger supply chain suites like Blue Yonder or Manhattan.
3D warehouse functionality. The unique 3D warehouse capability is particularly advantageous for larger warehouses, enhancing operational efficiencies through a virtual 3D layout.

Cons

Limited suitability for large enterprises. While excelling in upper mid-market warehouses, Infor WMS might not be the optimal choice for high-volume warehouses with smaller dollar transactions.
Weakness in TMS execution. The Transportation Management System (TMS) component is not as robust, necessitating the adoption of a best-of-breed TMS execution product to align with more robust suites like Blue Yonder.
Suboptimal for 3PL. While possessing capabilities similar to SAP EWM, Infor WMS is not tailored for 3PL perspectives, lacking in-depth compliance, freight audit features, and dispatch and rate shopping functionalities typically essential for 3PL operations.

5. Oracle WMS

Oracle WMS is well-suited for expansive transactional warehouses seeking a dedicated supply chain layer to manage high transaction volumes, 24/7 operations, or the warehouse architecture of a 3PL business model. It is particularly advantageous for enterprises desiring comprehensive supply chain capabilities within a unified suite, especially if already integrated with Oracle Cloud ERP. If you are a large enterprise, particularly leveraging other Oracle products like ERP or RMS, Oracle WMS may be a suitable choice.

Pros

Complete suite for a comprehensive tech stack. Oracle WMS integrates various supply chain capabilities, including RMS, S&OP, TMS, etc., offering a comparable feature set to other expansive suites like Blue Yonder and Manhattan.
Pre-integration with other Oracle apps. Oracle WMS seamlessly integrates with other Oracle applications such as ERP and TMS, eliminating the need for expensive custom integration efforts, making it suitable for large enterprises.
Proven for high transaction volumes. Oracle WMS has demonstrated its effectiveness in managing millions of transactions and large, busy warehouses and operations.

Cons

Overwhelming for smaller companies. The data model and product design may pose challenges for smaller organizations, introducing additional steps and operational overhead.
Dependency on add-ons for specific capabilities. Oracle lacks native capabilities for network, data, and maps, relying on partners to provide these features, limiting its execution capabilities.
Expensive customization for compliance workflows. Implementing compliance workflows not pre-built into the core requires substantial development and consulting efforts, contributing to higher customization costs compared to other solutions.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

4. SAP EWM

SAP EWM caters to enterprise-grade warehouses and distribution companies, especially those with a 3PL business model, particularly when integrated with other SAP solutions like SAP S/4 HANA. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller warehouses operating on a limited consulting budget. Opt for SAP EWM if you are a large distribution company with a global presence, particularly leveraging other SAP products such as SAP S/4 HANA or SAP Hybris.

Pros

Support for both decoupled and embedded architecture. This flexibility enables companies to facilitate 24/7 warehouse operations and accommodate the unique warehouse architecture demands of a 3PL business model, distinct from the financial representation in the ERP system.
Power of HANA. Leveraging the robust capabilities of HANA, SAP EWM can efficiently handle the demanding workloads of Fortune 500 organizations, providing a competitive edge compared to solutions that might struggle with such volumes.
Advanced capabilities for 3PL. SAP EWM offers features tailored for 3PL operations, including support for value-added services integral to the 3PL business model, and enhancing capabilities for billing and service offerings.

Cons

Too big for smaller companies. The complex data model of SAP EWM may pose challenges for smaller organizations seeking streamlined systems without the overhead crucial for larger enterprises.
Learning curve and expensive implementation. Implementing SAP EWM involves a significant learning curve and substantial implementation costs due to the system’s complexity.
Expensive. In comparison to other solutions on this list, SAP EWM’s pricing may not be as accommodating for smaller organizations.

3. Korber/HighJump

Korber/HighJump serves mid- to upper-mid-sized companies seeking an integrated suite, including last-mile capabilities. Although Korber/HighJump features various integrated components like TMS, DSD, and freight audit capabilities, it may not offer the same level of comprehensiveness as some other solutions on this list. Opt for Korber if you have graduated from standalone, smaller WMS systems and require a suite with advanced WMS capabilities tailored for mid-market companies.

Pros

Fairly comprehensive suite for both WMS and TMS. Korber’s suite encompasses several pre-integrated components, providing advantages not found in smaller solutions like mobe3.
Pre-integrated WMS and TMS. The pre-integrated WMS and TMS offered by Korber are particularly beneficial for mid-market companies, eliminating the need for extensive integration efforts required by standalone WMS and TMS systems.
DSD capabilities. Korber addresses the needs of companies in the DSD space, offering specialized capabilities such as proof of delivery, in-house fleet management, and unique dispatch and scheduling features based on routing or priority.

Cons

Issues with pre-baked integration. While Korber provides pre-baked integration, thorough vetting of integration flows based on specific requirements may be necessary. Custom integration might be required if existing flows prove insufficient for particular use cases.
Not a complete Supply Chain suite. Compared to other suites on this list, Korber may lack some comprehensive capabilities, such as integrated S&OP and control tower features that are more expansive in other solutions.
Not for enterprises. Unlike proven solutions such as Blue Yonder and Manhattan, Korber may not have as extensive experience with large accounts.

2. Blue Yonder

Blue Yonder boasts the strongest supply chain suite, coupled with advanced WMS capabilities, well-established in enterprises, particularly within high-volume retail companies. However, Blue Yonder may not be suitable for smaller businesses. Opt for Blue Yonder if you are a large enterprise, especially in the retail sector, seeking a comprehensive supply chain suite seamlessly integrated with a WMS.

Pros

Enterprise-grade WMS with pre-built components. Blue Yonder stands out as a leading supply chain suite, validated through successful collaborations with Fortune 500 accounts.
Ideal for retail-centric industries. Offering advanced capabilities tailored for retailers managing extensive SKU portfolios and multiple locations, Blue Yonder excels in location-level planning.
Pre-integrated support for all supply chain modes. Blue Yonder provides comprehensive assistance across all supply chain modes, inclusive of a supply chain control tower with advanced AI and ML capabilities, enhancing the existing WMS features.

Cons

Too large for SMBs. Blue Yonder’s extensive capabilities may be overwhelming for small and medium-sized businesses seeking simpler WMS solutions.
Cost-prohibitive for SMBs. The expense associated with Blue Yonder may be deemed excessive by SMBs without enterprise-scale requirements.
Lack of a network component in the supply chain suite. A notable drawback is Blue Yonder’s absence of an owned network. Solutions with an integrated network possess enhanced data control, enabling richer insights to augment WMS capabilities.

1. Manhattan Associates

Manhattan WMS stands as one of the most robust solutions in the market, particularly excelling in high-volume retail scenarios. While Manhattan may not offer the same comprehensiveness in its Supply Chain suite, it is exceptionally well-suited for large enterprises in the food, grocery, shoe, and apparel industries. However, it may not be the optimal choice for smaller businesses. Opt for Manhattan if you are a sizable company, particularly in the food, grocery, shoe, and apparel sectors, seeking a top-tier WMS solution.

Pros

The suite includes a pre-integrated point of sale. Manhattan’s suite incorporates a pre-integrated point of sale, offering significant advantages for companies lacking internal IT capabilities for integration or unwilling to invest in costly integration processes.
Capable of handling enterprise workloads. Proven with enterprise retailers dealing with extensive transaction volumes and SKU portfolios, Manhattan demonstrates proficiency in deep planning and merchandising capabilities.
Effective management of complex verticals. Manhattan excels in handling unique requirements associated with inventory planning in verticals like grocery, shoes, and apparel, showcasing specialized WMS capabilities.

Cons

Incomplete supply chain suite. Although Manhattan’s suite covers essential execution components such as WMS, TMS, OMS, and POS, it falls short in other supply chain pillars such as S&OP and network.
Requires add-ons for comprehensive supply chain capabilities. Companies seeking a holistic suite experience may need multiple add-ons to match the capabilities of other Supply Chain suites like Blue Yonder.
Not designed for SMBs. Tailored for enterprise companies, Manhattan’s design may not be as accommodating for smaller businesses seeking simpler solutions.

Conclusion

Selecting a WMS system can be challenging, given its intersection with various software categories and evolving packaging strategies. As technology progresses, the distinctions are becoming less clear, adding to the complexity.

For those seeking a new WMS system, a crucial step is understanding your business model and transactions and aligning them with suitable software with the help of independent WMS consultants. This list aims to offer a concise starting point for further evaluation.

FAQs

Which is the best WMS system?

Every WMS solution is tailored for specific purposes, industries, and transaction volumes. What works best for one company may not necessarily suit your requirements. To identify the optimal WMS solution, conduct a comprehensive analysis of your needs, ensuring alignment with a system designed for your industry and transaction volume.

If a WMS system is not included in this list, should companies consider that as a potential solution?

Absolutely. The absence of a solution from this list doesn’t necessarily imply it won’t suit your needs. Every solution has its place in the market. Our list is curated based on factors like market share and solution maturity, which may exclude newer solutions with limited capabilities.

Should I select a WMS system based on this list?

No, definitely not. We strongly advise engaging a professional independent selection consultant to conduct a comprehensive analysis of your requirements, establish criteria, and create customized rankings based on your specific needs. While this list offers a preliminary shortlist for your review, the ranking of these solutions may differ based on your unique requirements.

	LinkedIn Sam Gupta
	LinkedIn ElevatIQ
	LinkedIn WBSRocks

Featured Case Study

Featured Resource

Featured Video

Featured Resource

Featured Case Study

Featured Resource

Featured Video

Featured Resource

Featured Case Study

Featured Resource

Featured Video

Featured Resource

Enterprise Architecture

1. Project Initiation

Issues of Inadequate Project Initiation

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

2. Requirements Workshop

Issues of Inadequate Requirements Workshop

3. Business Process Re-engineering

Issues of Inadequate Business Process Re-Engineering

4. Data Re-engineering

Issues of Inadequate Data Re-engineering

5. Enterprise Architecture Development

Issues of Inadequate Enterprise Architecture Development

Conclusion

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

FAQs

The Importance of Coded Inventory

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Advanced Inventory Types

1. Matrix Inventory

2. Dimensional Inventory

3. Piece Inventory

ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

1. Mimic The Physical Process

2. Balancing Data Entry

3. Expert Review of SKU Design

4. Multiple Rounds of Testing During ERP Implementation

Conclusion

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

FAQs

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Key Review Insights

1. Global Expansion and Subsidiary Management

2. Deep Finance Capabilities

3. Best for Audit-ready SMBs

4. Scalable Solution for SMBs

5. eCommerce Friendly

6. Strong CRM Capabilities

7. Vibrant Marketplace

8. Weaker for Industrial Companies

Key Features of NetSuite ERP

Pros and Cons of NetSuite ERP

Conclusion

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

FAQs

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

1. Product Portfolio

Strategies to Simplify Product Portfolios

2. Pricing Dynamics

Key Dimensions in the Pricing Equation

3. Forms of Discounting

Key Dimensions in the Discounting Framework

4. Distribution Channels

5. Regulatory Challenges

6. Source of Truth

7. Data Silos

8. Complexity of CPQ

9. Two-way Integration

10. Purchase Price

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Conclusion

FAQs

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

1. Pricing Simplification

2. Prevent Human Errors

3. Tackle Data Entry Challenges

4. Maintain Consistency in Financial Data

5. Encourage a Step Back

6. Automation and Integration

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management